Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Noob to tuning. Bnr stage 3 rtek 1.8 safc?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2011 | 01:52 PM
  #1  
DR_Knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 161
From: san diego
Noob to tuning. Bnr stage 3 rtek 1.8 safc?

have a s4 with s5 t2 block running s4 electronics. Fmic fcd 3 inch exhaust greddy profec 2 boost controller and stock s5 turbocharger for now.
Planning on running a bnr stage 2 or 3 turbo with rtek 1.8 720s all around and onky looking to boost about 13 psi. Is a safc required just to drive the car on the streets and boost safely about 9 lbs?

my main question is if I run a turbocharger that spools up quicker do I have to change the fuel map? Or does the rtek provide fuel based on pressure vs rpm?.

Anybody running rtek 2.0 that used to run 1.8 and recommend the upgrade?

I appologize for all of the questions but all help is greatly appreciated

Last edited by DR_Knight; May 3, 2011 at 01:53 PM. Reason: changed title
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 02:38 PM
  #2  
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 6
From: Beaverton, OR
Check the RTEK forums...
https://www.rx7club.com/rtek-forum-168/

I ran a RTEK 1.5 with the stock turbo creeping up to ~13psi (generally would just go part throttle to keep creep down) with a slightly retarded CAS, Not safe, but it didn't blow. This was S4 8.5:1 rotors though.

I can't tell you that 9psi would be safe on a hybrid...
Reply
Old May 3, 2011 | 05:37 PM
  #3  
chatchie's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: mass
I think 1.8 raises the map by 5% and retards 1 degree of timing per pound of boost rise.

My AFRS with the stock S4 turbo were high 12 @ 13psi.

You should stop whatever your doing and buy a wideband if you dont already have one.
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 07:39 AM
  #4  
DR_Knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 161
From: san diego
Already got a aem uego onboard. Was just trying to see what I would need to run that setup
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 11:05 AM
  #5  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
ditch the rtec, and ditch nearly all the ending electronics, and get a stand alone ems.
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 06:20 PM
  #6  
siguy2k's Avatar
SLEEPER
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 11
From: nebraska
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
ditch the rtec, and ditch nearly all the ending electronics, and get a stand alone ems.
X2! My power fc base map ran smoother than the piggybacks I had tried! Stand alones are worth the money!
Reply
Old May 4, 2011 | 10:06 PM
  #7  
ColinShark's Avatar
RX-7 Old Timer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 10
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Originally Posted by siguy2k
X2! My power fc base map ran smoother than the piggybacks I had tried! Stand alones are worth the money!
Rtek isn't a piggyback. But anyway....
Reply
Old May 5, 2011 | 11:57 PM
  #8  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
Originally Posted by ColinShark
Rtek isn't a piggyback. But anyway....
so what is it then?
Reply
Old May 6, 2011 | 03:35 PM
  #9  
FrankV702's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 11
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by ColinShark
Rtek isn't a piggyback. But anyway....
haha..

Originally Posted by SirCygnus
so what is it then?
It's a way of life!



I'm with SirCygnus... Ditch the Rtek and go with a standalone. You can get a Haltech Sprint RE for cheap brand new with brand new wiring harness. You'll be improving your setup by 100%
Reply
Old May 6, 2011 | 04:33 PM
  #10  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
A piggyback would be an SAFC or anything that intercepts sensor output signals to the ECU. Rtek'd ECUs are flashed versions of the stock computer. The 1.x versions can't be reprogrammed, while the 2.x versions can be flashed in real-time as much as you want. Not at all the same thing.

Everyone's going to have their own opinion, but there's no NEED for a standalone with a stock or hybrid turbo. The injector settings and AFM are good to ~400 whp. If you want to spend the extra $$, go for it. But a 2.x will get you most of the functionality of a standalone, while easily retaining emissions equipment for the CA smog-*****.
Reply
Old May 6, 2011 | 10:32 PM
  #11  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
ok so a piggy back is like a human riding a horse and controles where it it will go, but can be reverted to stock with the removal of the rider. rtec is like a brain slug. it latches on, and slowly the host dies with the coming days and the slug stays intact.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 12:07 PM
  #12  
2Fierce's Avatar
Cautious Angel
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 2
From: toronto
LMAO, searching and reviving, what did OP do?
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2011 | 05:52 PM
  #13  
gxl90rx7's Avatar
destroy, rebuild, repeat
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 17
From: Charleston, SC
go rtek 2.0 or standalone. rtek 1.x is asking for blown engine
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 05:01 PM
  #14  
DR_Knight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 161
From: san diego
i had the opportunity to purchase a haltech e6x but the buyer ended up selling it. as of right now I'm still saving up cash. I'm a big fan of the haltech ems' as i've had the e6x before and was working on tuning another one of my turbo rx7's but the engine blew and i went to a stock setup... a pretty stupid decision but back then i was naive.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
Oct 7, 2015 08:12 PM
matty
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Oct 6, 2015 09:13 PM
lnlreaper
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
Sep 27, 2015 09:59 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 PM.