Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Minimum Injector Openings (Idle and Big Inj)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #1  
fritts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Minimum Injector Openings (Idle and Big Inj)

I am one of those that's running 1600cc injectors in primary and secondary positions with E85. I ran into an interesting (somewhat expected) issue while tuning idle. I'm injecting sequentially so I can get away with the large primaries but there still seems to be an injector opening time minimum limit I have found. Including injector dead time I have not been able to go lower than approximately 1.5 ms of opening. Lower than that I find that my idle gets lopy, afr gets inconsistent and my egt's front to rear rotor stray apart. I believe one of my primaries is handling the low opening times better than the other. I was wondering what opening times others have found to be the minimum with these larger injectors? I have yet to play with the idle rpm (currently 850 rpm) or fuel pressure to raise the opening times in order to lean my idle out.


I also found an interesting article that talks about the minimum opening times of saturated/peak and hold and disc verses pintel.

http://suprasonic.org/public_html/so...rs/RCtech.html
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2008 | 05:34 PM
  #2  
AnthonyNYC's Avatar
Stay tuned...
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1997
Posts: 2,917
Likes: 1
From: West Islip, Long Island NY
1.3ms, tec3, 1680cc primaries...
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #3  
moremazda's Avatar
Gone Race'n
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 4
From: Rockford, IL
Originally Posted by AnthonyNYC
1.3ms, tec3, 1680cc primaries...
1.3ms does that include the dead time?

I am at ~1.75ms with no dead time comp (right now) on e85 with a base pressure of 45psi.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2008 | 07:26 PM
  #4  
Johny zoom's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,549
Likes: 0
From: Va
1.05 to 1.15 ms microtech 1600 primaries
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2008 | 07:42 PM
  #5  
fritts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Are these with or without dead/lag times?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #6  
Carlos Iglesias's Avatar
Corn-to-Noise Converter
Veteran: Navy
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 502
From: The Elysian Fields (Texas)
Just because the injector(s) is opening does not mean that it is accurate within the (usually unreliable) extremes of it's specs. For that matter, it's performance may be chaotic and inconsistent but still flow some indeterminate amount .

That said, I've learned most of what I know about injector dynamics from Paul @ YawPower. He is definintely an expert on the subject. For starter, you may want to read the article on his website (http://www.yawpower.com/injectordeadtimesarticle.html and if you still have questions, give him a call at the shop.

In full disclose, he is working with me on my Motec install. You can also check the EFI101 Forum for further credentials.

Last edited by Carlos Iglesias; Sep 23, 2008 at 10:14 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2008 | 08:16 AM
  #7  
fritts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
I understand we are at the extremes of the range and dead or lag time would make a great impact. I also have read the Yaw article. Which is why I don't believe they are actually metering at 1.3 ms maybe with out lag times added. On the 1600's they have extremely large lag times (.6- .8 ms @14 volts) anyway and that 1.3 would probably be in the 2.0 ms range anyway. I just was looking for what others have been able to go down to as I'm having issues below 1.5 ms with lag times. I have noticed the inconsistancy based on my egt changes for each rotor at 1.5 ms. I have heard from others that they have been able to use them down to this range and wanted to confirm or deny decent control at these extremes. I am going to have my 1600's dynamically tested to determine if they can be controlled accurately at these openings. On the car will surely be different than a bench setup but should be a good start for determining an appropriate minimum.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 06:38 AM
  #8  
fritts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
I sent my Bosch 160 lb "blues" 0280150842 to Injector Rehab. Everything flowed well and were fairly consistant across the board. I ask them to check out whether these injectors would operate in the 1.5 ms range. They did some dynamic tests on one of the injectors and found it would not operate at below 2.0 ms of opening. Hmm, explains some of the problems I was having in the 1.7 ms opening range at idle. Again all these numbers do not include lag times which are around 0.7-1.0 ms. I guess RC was correct in that these injectors really should be kept to a minimum of 2.0 ms of opening with lag times. Injector Rehab said they would try and get a video of the injector having issues below 2.0 ms of opening, when they do I will update this thread with the video.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #9  
2a+RoN's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
From: chandler, AZ
I will try to find an example chart of what these injectors look like dynamically, very non-linear down low...
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #10  
slo's Avatar
slo
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
I had the 1680 blue tops down to 1.1MS with a steady idle. I did find that fuel pressure had a huge effect with these and got the best results with a base pressure of 40 psi. I of course have no way of knowing what the actual effective open time was, but it was consistent enough to keep the car idling around 900 rpm.

Last edited by slo; Sep 30, 2008 at 11:45 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #11  
fritts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Slo, do you know what your lag settings are for those injectors?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #12  
slo's Avatar
slo
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Using an E8, is there a lag setting other than the battery correction map/injector dead time map?

injector dead time map: 0 at 14 volts linearized to .05 at 13 but it was close to 14 volts at idle, as I have a strong alternator.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #13  
2a+RoN's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
From: chandler, AZ
the dead time map is the lag setting, same thing.. Your dead times are way off, and am really surprised it would idle at all with almost no lag at 1.1ms...
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #14  
fritts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
Go here to update your lag/dead times you should be around .7-1.0 for the 1600's and 13-14 volts.

http://injector-rehab.com/kbse/lag.htm
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #15  
slo's Avatar
slo
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
I hadn't really messed with the dead time map, the project car gets worked on very sporadically. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the dead time map just adds that amount on top of the calculated injection time, is that correct?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #16  
fritts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
I pulled the 160 lb "blues" and switched to a 120 lb lucas injectors on the primaries. The EGT's came back inline when I changed them out. It also drove up my opening times which makes me feel better even though I will be limited in overall horsepower now. The 120 lb injectors do idle nicely though, but I have yet to get lag times on them. The 160 lb "blues" must have had sporatic flows/spray pattern in the low opening times and caused my idle problems even after cleaning them.

Slo, I believe the Haltech's do just add the dead time to the injection time from the fuel map.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 12:17 PM
  #17  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
If you're having problems idling with E85 using 1600cc injectors running a Haltech E8/11 then something is deffinately up. On E85 I have rotaries idling at 13.0-13.5 and piston motors idling at 14.5-16.1 afr's.
The key to a smooth idle and part throttle cruise with huge injectors is to have the injector dead time/battery compensation map and the end of injection map correct. With the haltech having the right current setup on the injector drivers also helps. You can also change the fueling scale factor to gain more resolution.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #18  
fritts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
I have played with all of those settings. I believe that some of the these 160 lb injectors are different than others and maybe the low opening times may be the problem. I was using approximately 1.4-5 ms of opening and after the dynamic test was told that the one injector they dynamically tested did not inject accurately under 2ms. Its not that the car would not idle it would, but was rather loppy and the individual rotor egts were not in sync with each other. When I switched to the Lucas injectors and the larger opening times the egts are back together again. I may have just had a problem with the one injector though.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #19  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by fritts
I have played with all of those settings. I believe that some of the these 160 lb injectors are different than others and maybe the low opening times may be the problem. I was using approximately 1.4-5 ms of opening and after the dynamic test was told that the one injector they dynamically tested did not inject accurately under 2ms. Its not that the car would not idle it would, but was rather loppy and the individual rotor egts were not in sync with each other. When I switched to the Lucas injectors and the larger opening times the egts are back together again. I may have just had a problem with the one injector though.
A lot the 160's on the market presently are just rebuilt injectors being advertised as new when they are not. Most if not all are rebuilt out of the country by just cleaning and changing the filter and adding a fresh paint job to make them look new!
The important part of the injector in stiil old, used and abused.
As of late most are failing and producing very inconsistent results. You got to be carefull where you purchase them from. I only use the ones that have been match flowed. Offcourse you're going to pay more for that but in the long run it pays off when you got a lot invested.
There are applications that run as much as 5-7 X 1600cc injectors per rotor. Imagine any of those injectors being inconsistent at that level.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #20  
Viking War Hammer's Avatar
*** Bless The USA
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis / Illinois
fritts, where did you buy yours?

I got my 160lb blue tops from http://www.yourperformancesource.com

Mine "looked" brand new. They weren't painted, all plastic.

Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 08:19 PM
  #21  
fritts's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
I believe I bought them through Spray it Racing. They did have the case of the injector painted black is that what your talking about viking. I still think they we are asking quite a bit from these injectors at these low openings.

Last edited by fritts; Oct 10, 2008 at 08:22 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 08:26 PM
  #22  
Viking War Hammer's Avatar
*** Bless The USA
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 0
From: Saint Louis / Illinois
I think my cases are plastic, not metal and they didn't look painted at all.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 08:42 PM
  #23  
C. Ludwig's Avatar
www.lms-efi.com
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 149
From: Floyds Knobs. IN
Originally Posted by Viking War Hammer


Kitty approved?
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 09:08 PM
  #24  
crispeed's Avatar
'Tuna'
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 3
From: Miami,Fl,USA
Originally Posted by C. Ludwig
Kitty approved?
And they are painted!

Most of the inconsistent ones that fail were 'white tops'.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 09:14 PM
  #25  
13B-RX3's Avatar
7s before paint!!!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,814
Likes: 0
From: Philly/Texas
Originally Posted by crispeed
And they are painted!

Oops thats the same ones i got.

Last edited by 13B-RX3; Oct 10, 2008 at 09:17 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM.