Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

GT35/40?? with "ITO"porting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-04, 07:12 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Fred Villamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pensacola, Fla.
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT35/40?? with "ITO"porting

Help !! I've read alot of the threads on the GT35/40 turbo , but none with the Judge ITO porting for the street . I'm still kinda new to tuning , have been non-seq. on the stockers for almost 2 years before the BANG !! I'm now rebuilding with the help of a local friend and he purchased the ITO porting templates recently . From all the reading I've done , I thought the GT35/40 was best for me , for use on the streets with an occasional trip to the track . I looked into the R85 kit , but it seems there aren't too many numbers out there yet , and/or good or bad stories about the kit. I've done all the reliability mods and all the bolt-on mods , stand alone system , wideband , AVC-R , etc. etc. ... any help/advice would be GREATLY appreciated !!! I am proficient with tools , and did all the work myself with an assistant , so I'm NOT afraid of the work ... thanks for your help
Old 12-29-04, 07:17 PM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
modrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fred we both know the GT40R is the turbo for you!!! Who are you trying to fool Call Sean @ A-Spec He'll tell ya...
Old 12-29-04, 07:38 PM
  #3  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Fred Villamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pensacola, Fla.
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm just doing my homework was curious to see what HP numbers to expect at 15psi and 20psi pulls ... have spent so much on the car already , just want to get the best BANG for the buck .
Old 12-29-04, 07:57 PM
  #4  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (1)
 
modrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was just joking with you, I wish you the best in your search for the best bang for the buck.

Happy Holidays
Edan
Old 12-29-04, 08:19 PM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Porting really has nothing to do with turbo performance...


-Ted
Old 12-29-04, 08:34 PM
  #6  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Fred Villamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pensacola, Fla.
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK , but wouldn't the car produce more power at certain boost levels with a ported motor as opposed to a stock ported motor with this turbo setup ??

Last edited by Fred Villamor; 12-29-04 at 08:39 PM.
Old 12-29-04, 08:55 PM
  #7  
Form follows function

iTrader: (8)
 
Speed of light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Now in Arizona
Posts: 1,203
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts
Porting really has nothing to do with turbo performance...
Well, not exactly....

....Porting will affect the engine's volumetric efficiency and thus the turbo's operating point or curve on its compressor map. A ported motor may be able to move more air (by weight) at a slightly lower boost pressure than stock ports. Therefore, the idea is to match the turbo's compressor to the level of boost and efficiency you want with the ports you have.
Old 12-30-04, 12:28 AM
  #8  
FOR SALE

 
ijneb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
Porting really has nothing to do with turbo performance...


-Ted
Im just curious as to why you say this.

I was under the understanding that porting was everything. It becomes a bottleneck in the stock system, which is why you want to make the ports bigger, to allow more air in and out quicker, which then spools the larger turbines quicker?
Old 12-30-04, 12:36 AM
  #9  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Fred Villamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pensacola, Fla.
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ted , please feel free to elaborate at any time ... ( now confused ) I was under the impression that you could extract more power from a turbo setup through porting , therefore eliminating the restriction of a stock ported motor , and allowing the turbo to produce more HP ??
Old 12-30-04, 05:05 AM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Sorry, that was almost a troll...

To qualify my statement...you can slap any turbo on any port, and it will still run.
I might not run at it's best efficiency, but it will run.

The way you starting this thread is rather interesting, as this is one of the few threads that tried to make a connection between engine porting and turbo size.

I'm sure you've heard that porting a rotary engine is the same as changing cam profiles on a piston engine.
Changes like this affect engine VE.
When porting is done right, engine VE is raised significantly.

There are numerous turbo sizing threads in here...if you look around.
Typically, you state your engine mods an there are suggestions for a turbo to match your needs.

nyt has started a recent thread on the limitations of the GT40, and I concur with his conclusions.


-Ted
Old 12-30-04, 08:58 AM
  #11  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Fred Villamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pensacola, Fla.
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
( very confused now ) basically , I want the car to be primarily a street/drag car with reliability . I want the car to be driven around , for fun , and to last awhile with big HP numbers . The motor will have the ITO porting done , mild porting done to the intake/exhaust ports , PFC , wideband , AVC-R , DP-resonated MP-Apexi N1 , HKS Twin Power , 850/1600cc inj , FMIC , Denso fuel pump ... that being stated , what is a good recomendation for a turbo kit to meet my needs ? Thanks again ... FV
Old 12-30-04, 10:31 AM
  #12  
Just in time to die

iTrader: (1)
 
Zero R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: look behind you
Posts: 4,143
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RETed

nyt has started a recent thread on the limitations of the GT40, and I concur with his conclusions.


-Ted
Just to keep it clear he was speaking of a Non BB GT4082 not the Ball bearing GT4088R.

-thanks
Old 12-30-04, 11:16 AM
  #13  
Junior Member

 
DIRep972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: DFW
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero R
Just to keep it clear he was speaking of a Non BB GT4082 not the Ball bearing GT4088R.

-thanks
Thanks for pointing that out. The GT4088 is still a bad bitch.
Old 12-30-04, 02:44 PM
  #14  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero R
Just to keep it clear he was speaking of a Non BB GT4082 not the Ball bearing GT4088R.
Apologies in advance...
All these turbo model names make me dizzy!
I was just pointing out the OEM Garrett applications, which I still keeps a GT40 a non-BB, right?

I like the GT3540 or GT35R for anything up to 400hp on pump gas.
I've messed with one, and it's a very nice turbo!

Anything larger (or more power), and prices starts to rise significantly.
It also opens up a lot more options, and our resident turbo experts can easily give their recommendations.
This is the 500hp and beyond...


-Ted
Old 12-30-04, 02:56 PM
  #15  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Fred Villamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pensacola, Fla.
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the help/advice guys , I appreciate the input . I'll keep readin' on
Old 12-31-04, 03:03 PM
  #16  
No it's not Turbo'd

 
DCrosby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From what I understand Porting, Mainly I was inquireing about my street port, raises the max hp that you are able to extract from a turbo... to the tune, of with identical setups you might see 380-390 hp from stock ports, vs 400-410 from street port, this sort of logic would suggest a bridge or periphreal port would allow you to raise those numbers by another 20-30 hp.. ??? I suppose... the importance of the port for me was spool up time, and supposedly the spool up time/lag is reduced as well since more air moves over the compressor blades giving more boost pressure sooner... and since more boost sooner, means even more boost once that air makes it through the rotors, as turbo systems are geometric in the way they build power.... you get to max pressure faster, the bigger the port. So:

Up Side -> Larger Port = Faster spool, and Higher Max Hp.
Down Side -> Larger Port = More Exhaust Gases = Not Smogable

-DC
Old 12-31-04, 05:58 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
z8cw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The GT35r is very popular since it flows what most people need on this board and is effecient around 15-20 pounds of boost.

Picking the compressor you need to match up your engine flows with the turbos capabilities and your boost level goals. Porting will determine your engines flow capability. Stock ports will not flow more than 35 lbs/min at 15 psi of boost where a bridge port can flow more than 50. In any case the 35R will cover street and stock ports up to 20 psi of boost very nicely.

Next thing to worry about is the turbine which will determine your spool up vs maximum power. The stock ports won't exceed a pressure ratio of 1.5 to 1 exhaust vs intake with a .82 AR, which is exceptable for a street machine not looking for maximum power only but a good balance of spool and power.

A large street would exceed 2 to 1 with that AR and might choke of maximum power potential, so a larger AR would be in order.

Sorry for the brabble

CW
Old 01-02-05, 09:32 AM
  #18  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Fred Villamor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pensacola, Fla.
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any info is good ... thanks again
Old 03-20-06, 11:01 PM
  #19  
D.I.L.U.S.I.

iTrader: (5)
 
full-cruise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: L-Town pa
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FRED what did end up going with and how did you make out with it??
Old 03-20-06, 11:49 PM
  #20  
7 Rx-7s since 1980

 
Asleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oHIo
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by z8cw
The GT35r is very popular since it flows what most people need on this board and is effecient around 15-20 pounds of boost.

Picking the compressor you need to match up your engine flows with the turbos capabilities and your boost level goals. Porting will determine your engines flow capability. Stock ports will not flow more than 35 lbs/min at 15 psi of boost where a bridge port can flow more than 50. In any case the 35R will cover street and stock ports up to 20 psi of boost very nicely.

Next thing to worry about is the turbine which will determine your spool up vs maximum power. The stock ports won't exceed a pressure ratio of 1.5 to 1 exhaust vs intake with a .82 AR, which is exceptable for a street machine not looking for maximum power only but a good balance of spool and power.

A large street would exceed 2 to 1 with that AR and might choke of maximum power potential, so a larger AR would be in order.

Sorry for the brabble

CW
Most intelligent post I have read in awhile. Nicely said.

With that said, and more than "playing around" with a couple of Gt35r (T3)'s and a now a Gt35r (T4) I would pick the latter of the two. Or, call Sean and talk to him about his "500" turbo based on the same workings with custom wheels.

Note that I have the Gt40r and would go with the Gt35r (t4) (or even better Sean/Aspec's "500").

Tony
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iamsisyphus
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
09-27-15 01:42 PM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
09-17-15 09:22 PM



Quick Reply: GT35/40?? with "ITO"porting



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM.