Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

G35 1050 vs G42 1200 on a 13B - Best Choice for 600hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-24, 03:23 PM
  #451  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7srbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: U.K - Instagram - copyninja_fd
Posts: 330
Received 154 Likes on 89 Posts
I did some low boost testing to compare differential fuel flow at 1bar between the old bosch 044 and new Walbro 450.

Bosch 044 - This run started off base fuel pressure with the bosch 044 at 50psi dropping to 46.8psi on the top of 3rd stabilizing to 47psi for the rest of 4th gear. 100-200 was completed in 7.81s,


The walbro 450 started the run with 50psi and shows a similar differential fuel pressure drop. Its not the end of the world as there could be some parasitic loss but i was hoping the walbro being more modern and powerful pump could have pushed through it and held a stable 50psi diff fp. The 100-200 was completed in 7.62 so no performance loss and within 0.2s of the previous pump at this level on a very safe and conservative tune.



On paper the walbro 450 is meant to flow more at 50psi base + 15.5 boost = approx 65psi. An approx 23% increase in fuel flow....yet in reality the logs confirm its no better than the older 044. It's truly very strange, perhaps a single walbro 450 is not better than the old school 044.

The following users liked this post:
estevan62274 (05-09-24)
Old 05-09-24, 03:51 PM
  #452  
#garageguybuild

iTrader: (32)
 
estevan62274's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Space Coast, Florida
Posts: 3,194
Received 774 Likes on 341 Posts
Arrow

Careful with this bulkhead connector.
When you run bigger pumps that connector will melt and short out.
The stock FD wiring cannot support the draw from bigger pumps.
I changed mine out to a ATL bulkhead and fuel safe wiring.





Steve
The following users liked this post:
rx7srbad (05-09-24)
Old 05-09-24, 04:20 PM
  #453  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,226
Received 772 Likes on 511 Posts
The Bosch Motorsports '044 pump flow rating from Bosch is done with a more viscous than gasoline fluid, so its flow is under-rated by the factory.

If you meant '044 flowing more than independent comparison testing on gasoline then IDK whats up.
Old 05-09-24, 04:21 PM
  #454  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7srbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: U.K - Instagram - copyninja_fd
Posts: 330
Received 154 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by estevan62274
Careful with this bulkhead connector.
When you run bigger pumps that connector will melt and short out.
The stock FD wiring cannot support the draw from bigger pumps.
I changed mine out to a ATL bulkhead and fuel safe wiring.

Steve
Hey thanks for the heads up, will have to do the same thing eventually.

Old 05-09-24, 04:30 PM
  #455  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7srbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: U.K - Instagram - copyninja_fd
Posts: 330
Received 154 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
The Bosch Motorsports '044 pump flow rating from Bosch is done with a more viscous than gasoline fluid, so its flow is under-rated by the factory.

If you meant '044 flowing more than independent comparison testing on gasoline then IDK whats up.
I got the Bosch 044 flow data from https://www.realstreetperformance.co...mance/#results
which was posted previously on the thread.
Old 05-09-24, 06:38 PM
  #456  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,226
Received 772 Likes on 511 Posts
That is data for the AEM knock-off of the Bosch '044 pump.

Back when Bosch still made genuine '044 I saw data from comparisons where the real '044s outflowed the knock-offs at high pressures.

Bosch now sells the higher flowing (0-580-464-200) fuel pump to replace the '044 (0 580 254 044)
The following users liked this post:
rx7srbad (05-10-24)
Old 05-09-24, 07:35 PM
  #457  
Arrogant Wankeler

 
Slides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Newcastle NSW Australia
Posts: 718
Received 123 Likes on 98 Posts
You definitely need wiring to support higher demand, it will turn the pump harder with higher actual voltage at the pump. More injector and lower base pressure will net more total flow from the same pump too.
Old 05-10-24, 03:42 AM
  #458  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7srbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: U.K - Instagram - copyninja_fd
Posts: 330
Received 154 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
That is data for the AEM knock-off of the Bosch '044 pump.

Back when Bosch still made genuine '044 I saw data from comparisons where the real '044s outflowed the knock-offs at high pressures.

Bosch now sells the higher flowing (0-580-464-200) fuel pump to replace the '044 (0 580 254 044)
Ahh that would be the most sensible conclusion as the low boost data suggests the bosch 044 seems to flow similar to the walbro 450. Strange that knock offs would be used in a fuel flow test. I may try one high boost hit and see if the differential fuel pressure does the same as the bosch or holds more stable. Looking at the low boost data it doesnt look promising.

Old 05-10-24, 03:56 AM
  #459  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7srbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: U.K - Instagram - copyninja_fd
Posts: 330
Received 154 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by Slides
You definitely need wiring to support higher demand, it will turn the pump harder with higher actual voltage at the pump. More injector and lower base pressure will net more total flow from the same pump too.
That's def a good shout.

Currently, I'm running AN6 lines throughout. I've integrated two inline filters, which I plan to disassemble and clean to assess any impact.

One consideration is the lack of 10 AWG wiring within the submersible section of the fuel hanger causing a voltage drop. Although I've ensured 10 AWG wiring from the battery to the fuel hanger, there's a possibility that the internal electrical connector might not handle the full electrical load as mentioned by Steve in the previous post. I've ordered the bulkhead to ensure 10awg wire goes into the submersible part of the pump to address this issue.

Another potential factor is the accuracy of the fuel flow data I acquired for the Bosch 044 fuel pump from the above link and as stated by blue tii.
Old 05-10-24, 06:18 PM
  #460  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7srbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: U.K - Instagram - copyninja_fd
Posts: 330
Received 154 Likes on 89 Posts
Did a comparison test on high boost approx 24psi between the bosch 044 and walbro 450.

Bosch 044
Differential fp - 50psi
Drops to 35psi and holds.



Walbro 450
Differential fp - 50psi
Drops to 44psi but clearly the winner of the two pumps at 24.5psi.


However, both pumps still display weird oscillations. Not entirely sure what that is.
Old 05-10-24, 11:24 PM
  #461  
Form follows function

iTrader: (8)
 
Speed of light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Now in Arizona
Posts: 1,205
Received 36 Likes on 23 Posts
That looks like hydraulic resonance. (FPDs are intended to damp this phenomenon.)
The following 2 users liked this post by Speed of light:
j9fd3s (05-11-24), rx7srbad (05-11-24)
Old 05-10-24, 11:25 PM
  #462  
Arrogant Wankeler

 
Slides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Newcastle NSW Australia
Posts: 718
Received 123 Likes on 98 Posts
Lots of hard line and no pulse damper?
The following 2 users liked this post by Slides:
j9fd3s (05-11-24), rx7srbad (05-11-24)
Old 05-11-24, 07:23 AM
  #463  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,098
Received 523 Likes on 291 Posts
here's a sample of my diff fuel pressure. variance about 2 tenths of a pound, logged around 30 hz. one 285 pump. 33% E. in a later dyno at 77% E my diff FP dropped to 19. i have since added another (274) pump and a 320 amp alternator as voltage had dropped to 13.9. this is w the Radium sump setup and a 267 lift pump. agree w Speed of Light and Slides as to the "why".



The following users liked this post:
rx7srbad (05-11-24)
Old 05-11-24, 04:18 PM
  #464  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7srbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: U.K - Instagram - copyninja_fd
Posts: 330
Received 154 Likes on 89 Posts
Thanks guys, running the standard oem damper from the primary line, clearly not good enough.
Nice one Howard, that looks way better. Which turbo are you running on this setup?
I upgraded to the link g4x today and ive run into some teething issues with the ecu transfer, the fuel and oil pressure calibrations dont seem to be playing ball with the g4x and the live logging parameters seem to not record anything.
Also got some interesting data about fuel injection timing confirmed by Adam at link for the link ecu platforms.
Old 05-13-24, 02:36 AM
  #465  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (8)
 
rx72c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,802
Received 116 Likes on 66 Posts
That much oscillation would show in your lambda curve (And it seemingly does not). I would be more suspicious of the wiring of the sensor rather than a "pulsation" issue.
The following users liked this post:
rx7srbad (05-13-24)
Old 05-13-24, 03:23 AM
  #466  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (17)
 
neit_jnf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Around
Posts: 3,908
Received 188 Likes on 136 Posts
there's a thread here somewhere that goes into detail about large injectors and fuel pulsation.... the short version is a good FPD is recommended
Old 05-13-24, 11:06 AM
  #467  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (2)
 
iceman4357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 1,889
Received 131 Likes on 75 Posts
I would be curious to see what a fuel pump relay would do if anything. Agree with other statements that the stock wiring is inadequate. Since your battery is next to the fuel pump, maybe try a relay to see if it changes anything.

https://www.sakebombgarage.com/plug-...ess-fd3s-rx-7/

This does not fix the stock bulkhead issue, but will make sure that your pumps are in fact getting the correct voltage. Wondering is the similar performance in the 044 and 450 is simply due to the aging wiring.
The following users liked this post:
rx7srbad (05-14-24)
Old 05-14-24, 06:01 PM
  #468  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7srbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: U.K - Instagram - copyninja_fd
Posts: 330
Received 154 Likes on 89 Posts
Completely forgot about this! I bought this back in September 2023 and just stumbled upon it in storage. It was time to dig it out and finally get it loaded in the car.


The Old Faithful Link G4+ (EPIC ECU) boxed up in its new oem case ready to be shipped out to its new owner. It's an epic modern ECU that got me knocking on the door of 5-second 100-200 times. It would push even harder if my fuel system wasn't holding it back.



Alright, all you garage queens and wiring wizards with a touch of the OCD, look away! I'm still rocking the stock ECU harness on this bad boy with all the battle scars. It's 32 years old, a tangled mess of wires held together by hope and zip ties, but damn it gets the job done. This thing pulled me into the 5-second club for the 100-200 and fires up every time I grab the keys and unleash the fury of the FD. Don't need fancy, new-age stuff when the old relic does the trick!



Hold my beer! Just shoved a brand new Link G4X ECU into the crusty old case of my 32-year-old OEM ECU. It may look like a junkyard find, but inside it's rocking the latest tech. Talk about sleeper engine management, nothing to see here Mr Officer, its just a stock ECU.



I got most of the sensors dialed in nice and easy. But for the love of all things boost, the oil and fuel pressure sensors were being total gremlins. Calibrated them a million times, checked every setting, but no dice. Decided to take a closer look, and wouldn't you know it, the culprit showed its face right away. Turns out a signal wire must have gotten pinched or something during the swap, because it popped right out of its crimp. At least its a simple fix.


Here's the battle plan to crank up to 2bar ~29psi on pump fuel and wmi.
  1. Gotta fix that busted G4X expansion loom. Contacted a local motorsport wiring shop and hoping they can whip up a new one. No dodgy wires holding me back this time and hopefully clean up the data from the sensors.
  2. Order a radium 4-port secondary fuel rail to throw in 2 additional 1500cc injectors. Should slash my injector duty cycle from a scary 95% down to a much safer 70%, giving me the headroom I need.
  3. Ditching the tired fuel pump wiring - it's time for a modern upgrade. Hoping the local motorsport wiring shop can fit me in sooner rather than later.
  4. Once everything's dialed in, time to crank it up to 2 bar and see how it blasts through the 100-200. That's the real test!
But that's not all folks, got two more mods waiting in the wings to see if 2 bar can do even better.

These are the final boss mods (if you know, you know). Soon it will be time to see if the below mods can do better than the stock upper intake manifold and the old-school HKS cast iron manifold? Are they all hype (dyno queens) with no bark? or all the hype with the 100-200 to back it up? I dont know but will find out... if all goes well. Pray for me!

The following 4 users liked this post by rx7srbad:
estevan62274 (05-14-24), j9fd3s (05-15-24), MaD^94Rx7 (05-14-24), Slides (05-14-24)
Old 05-16-24, 11:05 PM
  #469  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (2)
 
iceman4357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 1,889
Received 131 Likes on 75 Posts
Who made the turbo manifold for you?
Old 05-17-24, 04:21 PM
  #470  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7srbad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: U.K - Instagram - copyninja_fd
Posts: 330
Received 154 Likes on 89 Posts
Originally Posted by iceman4357
Who made the turbo manifold for you?
Sas Autoworks, fabricator from the UK. The only downside is he holds no stock and orders can take a while to complete. I had to wait about 5 months from order date to manifold being delivered.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sstcabinboy
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
43
02-22-08 09:00 PM
808rota
General Rotary Tech Support
1
03-22-07 06:20 AM
RX7UP
Race Car Tech
6
03-26-05 06:43 PM
FatalFD
Single Turbo RX-7's
2
01-15-03 02:32 PM



Quick Reply: G35 1050 vs G42 1200 on a 13B - Best Choice for 600hp?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.