Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

G30-660 any good for 350rwhp street?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 09:45 PM
  #26  
cstone94's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 95
Likes: 10
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by BLUE TII
Nope...

But because the streetport engine was dead Im not judging the G30-660 streetport dyno as indicative of the turbo's capabilities on a 13B

It only made 100rwhp Dynojet at 3,000rpm in a 2,000rpm pull.

Far behind an EFR 7670 which are 175rwhp @ 3,000rpm.

this G30-660= 180ftlbs torque @ 3,000rpm
EFR 7670= 300ftlbs torque @ 3,000rpm

Again looking forward to seeing G30-660 results on healthier set-ups.
Please keep in mind, this dyno graph is 2 days before the 6 year old motor popped, with less than 50 psi of compression on Rotor 2.


Edit: Reading on my phone… You did acknowledge the engine condition from the jump… My b!!

Last edited by cstone94; Mar 29, 2023 at 10:14 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2023 | 09:59 PM
  #27  
TeamRX8's Avatar
10000 RPM Lane
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,741
Likes: 924
From: on the rev limiter
it made 434 whp DJ at 17 psi in the initial build phase with a less than optimum engine condition.

In your initial build phase the EFR7670 only made 419 whp DJ at a much higher 26 psi.

And apparently still haven’t picked up on the turbine housing differences that I’ve had multiple conversations with the wall on for the last two years. Otherwise it might have been recognized that the Pulsar 0.85 A/R div T4 housing is going to be a closer equivalent to the BW 1.05 A/R housing that was on the EFR7670.

To put it in perspective, the G30 1.06 housing is a closer fit to the EFR8374 0.92 housing. That’s why I chose the -770 compressor for the build I’m working on.

To be fair, I doubt they will spool up quite as fast as the EFR at the very bottom, but how close and whether it will matter is yet to be determined.

The size dimension differences allow the G30 to fit easier and also with more separation from the LIM if it’s done right. That didn’t seem to get much consideration on the manifold that was posted up. There are also likely to be differences between them that aren’t discernible on a dyno graph.

While I’m on my soapbox, let me clarify that a V-band is still a single scroll. The differences between single and twin scroll didn’t suddenly vanish when the V-band version showed up. On the G30/35 it’s still only a single 2” pipe size. So you’re merging two 2” pipe sizes into a single one and so far nobody is using a divider to shield them from interfering with and crossing over each other.
.

Last edited by TeamRX8; Mar 29, 2023 at 10:14 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2023 | 03:19 PM
  #28  
rx72c's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 195
From: Australia
Has anyone got any real word data on a g35-900 T4 1.06 divided? Not interested in the 1050

Curious to see spool.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2023 | 05:38 PM
  #29  
TeamRX8's Avatar
10000 RPM Lane
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,741
Likes: 924
From: on the rev limiter
should be pretty good imo

you could even look at the G35-900 with the Pulsar PTG35 0.85 div T4 housing rather than the G30 turbos for the lower hp range, it should flow about what the G30 1.06 will, but is likely not the best response for autocross on E85 etc.

the estimates for my rationale:



.

.


or alternatively the G40-900 with 0.84 A/R for less emap


.

Last edited by TeamRX8; Apr 2, 2023 at 05:50 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chaotic_FC
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Oct 21, 2008 06:43 PM
sunil517
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
1
Feb 29, 2008 06:37 PM
kabooski
Rotary Drag Racing
1
Feb 5, 2008 09:28 PM
sub9lulu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
2
Aug 24, 2003 05:34 PM
Marcel Burkett
Single Turbo RX-7's
16
Apr 2, 2003 06:33 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 PM.