Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

crank case pressure control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-11, 07:41 AM
  #26  
Racing Rotary Since 1983

iTrader: (6)
 
Howard Coleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hiawassee, Georgia
Posts: 6,097
Received 520 Likes on 290 Posts
"So can I use the PCV nipple on the filler neck and the factory vent nipple on my middle iron and run them both to a catch?"

perhaps i am misunderstanding you but...

the primary reason that oil catch cans get filled is they are only venting one side of the motor. if you vent both sides then you always have a unobstructed breather and therefore any crankcase pressure is free to vent so nothing will push the oil up and out.

the typical "vented" FD has a breather only on the driver's (left) side. great for left hand turns but worthless for right hand turns.

vent both sides. Mazda was righteous enough to even supply the vent hole for single turbo setups

also, cap the additional vent hole.

howard
Old 04-04-11, 11:37 AM
  #27  
I'll blow it up real good

iTrader: (1)
 
RX-Heven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by thewird
RX-Heven, your solution also eliminates the OMP.

thewird
Mine just happened to be eliminated to begin with. It can easily be done without eliminating the OMP and has been done on another car since mine. I have also seen a breather line coming right out the front of the front cover about halfway up.
Venting the other side is especially easy on FD's or Cosmo engines as they can use the rear oil return line on those engines, of course only if they have gone with a single turbo setup.
Old 04-04-11, 11:47 AM
  #28  
I'll blow it up real good

iTrader: (1)
 
RX-Heven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No matter how simple the solution really is, people on this forum will continue to make a mountain from a molehill over this simple issue. What doesn't help either is guys who don't track their cars offering solutions to a problem they don't really understand or offer a real fix for.

Sure, they may have solved the problem when encountered on a dyno or doing straight-line pulls but that does not address the entire problem and certainly does not fix the issue under all circumstances.
For people who don't push their cars while cornering this may be fine but otherwise:
Vent the other side of the engine.
Old 04-04-11, 03:23 PM
  #29  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
Originally Posted by Boxer2rotary
So can I use the PCV nipple on the filler neck and the factory vent nipple on my middle iron and run them both to a catch? Currently the PCV and middle iron nipple are just open.
What is the vent nipple on the middle iron you are referring to? I thought REW engines don't have this? T2 engines do though
Old 04-04-11, 08:30 PM
  #30  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (5)
 
Trout2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,082
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Some REW's have the vent nipple on the center iron. From what I've seen, it's the early ones.

Jack
Old 04-05-11, 10:12 AM
  #31  
Full Member

iTrader: (8)
 
Boxer2rotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay sounds easy enough. So just tap the block off plate for the rear oil return seem sthe easiest. Is there any way to use the block off plate for the OMP?

Yes the early ones did have a nipple on the middle irons. I questioned it the first time I seen it myself.
Old 04-05-11, 04:34 PM
  #32  
Fast + Reliable = $$$$$

iTrader: (18)
 
PandazRx-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yup, vent both sides of the motor and it works perfect... after about 5 track events on R888's I have only accumulated about 2oz of oil.

I used an adapter similar to pic below for the unused rear oil drain, a 3/8" brass 90 degree barb fitting, 3/8" Goodyear fuel injection hose and a small Jazz catch can pictured below. One side of catch can goes to stock oil filler neck and the other side of the catch can goes to the fitting on the block. DONE!




(hose not connected in yet in this pic...)
Old 04-06-11, 07:20 PM
  #33  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Marcel Burkett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: trinidad and tobago
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great , I'll do this immediately ! this thing is driving me nuts !
Old 04-06-11, 11:01 PM
  #34  
Rotor Head Extreme

iTrader: (8)
 
t-von's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 17 Posts
My.02. I actually think the rear turbo return line is a poor choice since all the oil sloshes towards the back under acceleration. Under acceleration your under boost for the most part. When this happens the oil is already filling the rear hole. Then you have the crank case pressure that forces the oil up the line to the catch can. I think if you simply move the turbo return to the rear and use the front return as the vent, you can possibly eliminate any of these filling problems. If oil can't reach a point of entry, it can't fill a line therefore working it's way to the catch can will be a non-issue.
Old 04-19-11, 10:13 PM
  #35  
Senior Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Rawbz08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bakersfield,Ca
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t-von
My.02. I actually think the rear turbo return line is a poor choice since all the oil sloshes towards the back under acceleration. Under acceleration your under boost for the most part. When this happens the oil is already filling the rear hole. Then you have the crank case pressure that forces the oil up the line to the catch can. I think if you simply move the turbo return to the rear and use the front return as the vent, you can possibly eliminate any of these filling problems. If oil can't reach a point of entry, it can't fill a line therefore working it's way to the catch can will be a non-issue.

With your .02 cents added has anyone tried this method to see if it's worth running a longer drain line?
Old 04-20-11, 06:55 AM
  #36  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Marcel Burkett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: trinidad and tobago
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rawbz08
With your .02 cents added has anyone tried this method to see if it's worth running a longer drain line?
This seems like a great idea but due to the degree of difficulty and the limited space under there , I elected to use the rear port , after some testing I'll decide which I will stay with .
Old 04-20-11, 10:23 AM
  #37  
Senior Member

iTrader: (6)
 
finger lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by t-von
My.02. I actually think the rear turbo return line is a poor choice since all the oil sloshes towards the back under acceleration. Under acceleration your under boost for the most part. When this happens the oil is already filling the rear hole. Then you have the crank case pressure that forces the oil up the line to the catch can. I think if you simply move the turbo return to the rear and use the front return as the vent, you can possibly eliminate any of these filling problems. If oil can't reach a point of entry, it can't fill a line therefore working it's way to the catch can will be a non-issue.
Fellas, don't reinvent the wheel here. Remember this issue is pretty much reserved only for high G-loaded cornering with the OEM style venting system (right turns). Venting to the rear OEM turbo return works perfectly well. Tinker if you must, but a race-demonstrated, working solution has already been engineered and fabricated (See Damian's thread).

Guy
Old 04-23-11, 08:15 AM
  #38  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Marcel Burkett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: trinidad and tobago
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello all , I completed the install and there is no sign of oil anymore !!! thank you all for the great advice (as ususl!) I am now thinking of placing another vent line on the front cover , any more pics or write up of this mod would be greatly appreciated !!
Thanks again !!
Old 05-01-11, 07:56 PM
  #39  
Bridge Port Freak

iTrader: (12)
 
ArmyOfOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alzey, Germany
Posts: 1,029
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks for posting the results.
Old 05-03-11, 07:54 AM
  #40  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
Marcel Burkett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: trinidad and tobago
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Marcel Burkett
Hello all , I completed the install and there is no sign of oil anymore !!! thank you all for the great advice (as ususl!) I am now thinking of placing another vent line on the front cover , any more pics or write up of this mod would be greatly appreciated !!
Thanks again !!
Hello again , this method of control for oil migration worked really well , but it did not fix the real cause of why there was soo much blow by in the first place. Unfortunately it seems like one of the smaller seals had started to give way , and completely quit last Saturday requireing an engine rebuild.I'll know more after I get it out and open it up , I'll post up what I find.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
Snoopy FD
Build Threads
25
12-08-15 01:45 PM
PhillyFC
General Rotary Tech Support
9
08-21-15 06:36 PM



Quick Reply: crank case pressure control



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.