Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Borg Warner S200SXR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2025 | 07:05 PM
  #1  
Gtray7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not my first rodeo
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 39
Likes: 15
From: Florida
Borg Warner S200SXR

I'm hoping my math is mathing...

Current setup is a freshly rebuilt 13B-REW with stock apex seals and a mild street port in a GSL-SE. Induction is NA through a Weber 48IDA.

I'm currently in the process of acquiring the parts necessary to return it to EFI with FD manifolds, TB, and compression elbow. It will remain NA for a bit while i get the fuel and timing mapped out and I can spend time focusing on as much drivability as possible.

Fuel System
Stock fuel tank and pump feeding a 2 liter surge tank mounted under hood. Single Bosch 044 pump feeding through 6an lines to Deatschwerks FD fuel rails and 4 x 1000cc injectors.

Power goal is 350WHP peak at 7000k RPM.

Most of the turbo options I see discussed are aiming for considerably more power, using considerably more fuel, and going through considerably stronger drivetrain parts. I have no desire to make 500+ HP with this car. My goal is 350WHP. I'd rather not have too big of a turbo. Unless i'm missing something feel like a smaller turbo would better suit my platform and work more efficiently.

My math says i should have no problems supplying 5lbs/m of fuel to accommodate 50lbs/m of airflow. I feel like that is the sweet spot for my power goals.

Looking at the Borg Warner S200SX-R I feel like the numbers line up with my goals.

Is my math right? Am I missing something? All the attention always falls on the S300 line because they make considerably more power and that is all fine and good, but for somebody like myself I have goals for quick spool and modest power. I'm just feeling a sense of trepidation because there is little to no mention of the S200 line being used on any 13B platform.



Reply
Old Feb 18, 2025 | 12:40 AM
  #2  
Slides's Avatar
Arrogant Wankeler
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 230
From: Hunter Valley NSW Australia
That should work fine. The difficulty with going smaller is you generally have to give up some peak power rpm and usable overrev but it will pick up earlier than a 300 series.


Looks like they do have several larger AR turbine housing options though.

Last edited by Slides; Feb 18, 2025 at 10:57 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2025 | 08:20 AM
  #3  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
+1, that should do fine, in fact you'd have some headroom to go bigger.
i've run a V Trim and now a T04E-46 on my car, and the ECU says both are right at the 300hp mark (i'm thinking flywheel though)
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2025 | 01:20 PM
  #4  
donrafa7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 96
Likes: 7
From: Denver
I was looking at something similar. Since I have yet to find an s200sxr dyno i threw in some number into the BW matchbot. Below is a a comparison with the s362sxe and efr8374 (different price league just threw in for data). Points at 3,4,5,6,7,8,k rpm. Boost at 7,12,17psi to redline. what drew my eye was that the 362 was more efficient at every point including the low rpm. At the upper end was much more efficient and could go for higher power if needed. Point 5 is hair under 50lb/min. Not sure if that will translate to faster spool down low though. would love to see a dyno tbh.





Last edited by donrafa7; Feb 18, 2025 at 01:57 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2025 | 02:36 PM
  #5  
Gtray7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not my first rodeo
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 39
Likes: 15
From: Florida
Originally Posted by donrafa7
I was looking at something similar. Since I have yet to find an s200sxr dyno i threw in some number into the BW matchbot. Below is a a comparison with the s362sxe and efr8374 (different price league just threw in for data). Points at 3,4,5,6,7,8,k rpm. Boost at 7,12,17psi to redline. what drew my eye was that the 362 was more efficient at every point including the low rpm. At the upper end was much more efficient and could go for higher power if needed. Point 5 is hair under 50lb/min. Not sure if that will translate to faster spool down low though. would love to see a dyno tbh.

I’ve been playing with the Matchbot a lot lately and I’m getting similar results.

I might just roll with the S362. I like the idea that they’re more prevalent and available than the S200. I can usually find the S362 on marketplace as an unused part somebody bought for a project or tried out and went to a bigger option.

I don’t know… I also like being different so I may just get the s200 🤷🏻‍♂️🤣
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2025 | 02:46 PM
  #6  
donrafa7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member: 10 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 96
Likes: 7
From: Denver
haha, from some more reading, efficiency does not directly = spool. it is a factor. Plus with the BW matchbot you are inputting PSI and getting a result. maybe the s200sxr is hitting higher PSI and sooner than what is being input. you should do the s200, we need the info. might be a perfect setup for a lot of people. IE a replacement for the twins with similar power + spool, + better reliability and lower heat.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2025 | 02:49 PM
  #7  
Gtray7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not my first rodeo
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 39
Likes: 15
From: Florida
Originally Posted by donrafa7
haha, from some more reading, efficiency does not directly = spool. it is a factor. Plus with the BW matchbot you are inputting PSI and getting a result. maybe the s200sxr is hitting higher PSI and sooner than what is being input. you should do the s200, we need the info. might be a perfect setup for a lot of people. IE a replacement for the twins with similar power + spool, + better reliability and lower heat.
im kind of a pioneer
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2025 | 04:50 PM
  #8  
rx7srbad's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 476
Likes: 240
From: Instagram - Copyninja_FD

SXE 200 was tested at 1.3 bar, and while there’s limited info on the setup. The owner achieved a 100-200 km/h time of 7.84 seconds (no draggy report so unsure if run was valid), which equates to around 400hp (not rwhp). Luckily, this owner even tested the 200-250 km/h range, the time was 9.37 seconds, about 1.5 seconds slower than the 100-200 km/h run. This suggests the top-end performance is limited, as expected with a smaller turbo. Nonetheless, it's still an overall impressive result for this turbo/ small street port combination.

I imagine the S200 sxr might be similar or a touch quicker.


Reply
Old Feb 18, 2025 | 05:20 PM
  #9  
Gtray7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Not my first rodeo
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 39
Likes: 15
From: Florida
Originally Posted by rx7srbad
SXE 200 was tested at 1.3 bar, and while there’s limited info on the setup. The owner achieved a 100-200 km/h time of 7.84 seconds (no draggy report so unsure if run was valid), which equates to around 400hp (not rwhp). Luckily, this owner even tested the 200-250 km/h range, the time was 9.37 seconds, about 1.5 seconds slower than the 100-200 km/h run. This suggests the top-end performance is limited, as expected with a smaller turbo. Nonetheless, it's still an overall impressive result for this turbo/ small street port combination.

I imagine the S200 sxr might be similar or a touch quicker.
I think I’m sold on this one.

My car is an FB with admittedly dodgy steering. I need to fab up some reinforcements for the fenders and the front spoiler before I attempt any kind of speed over 120mph/200kph.

im also traction limited by tire size, they’re essentially my slipper clutch.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2025 | 09:01 AM
  #10  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
forgot to add, the two turbos i've used are rated at 44lbs per minute for the V trim and 41 for the T04E-46, the T04E-46 is rated at 350hp (again flywheel) at 13psi. which i think i can do
so you're on the right track there, my setup has no headroom to make more power

and i'll second the notion that 120+ is faster than you want to go in a 1st gen!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zaz1920
Single Turbo RX-7's
10
Nov 8, 2017 09:57 AM
mikey13b
Alternative Fuels
3
Sep 29, 2016 09:03 PM
GrossPolluter
Single Turbo RX-7's
13
Mar 3, 2014 11:04 AM
Mitchocalypse
Single Turbo RX-7's
13
Nov 9, 2012 11:38 PM
bladz311
Single Turbo RX-7's
9
Apr 13, 2004 06:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.