An FC in FATF 4?
02-28-08, 11:03 AM
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
02-29-08, 01:28 AM
#11
40k worth of fail
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those cars didn't have absurd graphics on them and **** poor styling... I'm kinda thinking they aren't the featured cars. Besides, Paul Walker is driving a WRX STi.
02-29-08, 03:09 AM
#14
is that rice i smell?
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol i wasnt even aware they were making another movie, hopefully this one wont end with vin diesle drifting an impalla hahahah at least thats what i think it was
02-29-08, 10:53 AM
#15
Okay, I just thought I saw a thread with a bunch of losers arguing about drifting, and how **** do it. Now the same people hating, are wondering what the F&F 4 FC will look like...
02-29-08, 12:26 PM
#19
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: phoenix, AZ
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An Impala? ? ? Better look again. Do a search for a car called "HAMMER" it was built by Pure Vision (Steve Strope). The car you're talking about is a 1970 Plymouth RoadRunner.
02-29-08, 12:27 PM
#20
The movie producers prey on the fact that people want to watch good car movies. and there are very FEW good car movies. And as long as retards like me keep paying 11 or 12 bucks at the theater to watch them, they will keep making them. Whatever, its not like these movies effect me in anyway so far.
But *** boi drifting seems to have gone hog wild with the lastest F&F movie.
02-29-08, 01:42 PM
#21
RE_p Rotors
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Newport News/Fredericksburg
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
at least they seem to be more practical cars..like normal people could buy..unlike redline racing lambos and enzos and ****. the plot will prob suck but will i watch it..most likely yes
02-29-08, 02:22 PM
#22
Canadian Boost
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
from what i have read on some other forums and web sites, from personal experieance other people have had when 'lendeing' their cars over to the producers is not so good.
according to one guy when he lent him his car for the 2nd movie, they said they would pay him 500 a day that they had the car. now when he got his car back, they only gave him 250 ( this was only for the time that the car was on camera, so about 12hrs od shooting.
on top of this, when he got the car back there was no clutch left, suspension peices needed to be replace and they treated the car like ****. all repair at the owners expense aswell.
i think it cool that you buddy has his car in the move dont get me wrong, but i would be very skeptical as to let people i dont even know beat on my car.
according to one guy when he lent him his car for the 2nd movie, they said they would pay him 500 a day that they had the car. now when he got his car back, they only gave him 250 ( this was only for the time that the car was on camera, so about 12hrs od shooting.
on top of this, when he got the car back there was no clutch left, suspension peices needed to be replace and they treated the car like ****. all repair at the owners expense aswell.
i think it cool that you buddy has his car in the move dont get me wrong, but i would be very skeptical as to let people i dont even know beat on my car.
02-29-08, 04:05 PM
#25
from what i have read on some other forums and web sites, from personal experieance other people have had when 'lendeing' their cars over to the producers is not so good.
according to one guy when he lent him his car for the 2nd movie, they said they would pay him 500 a day that they had the car. now when he got his car back, they only gave him 250 ( this was only for the time that the car was on camera, so about 12hrs od shooting.
on top of this, when he got the car back there was no clutch left, suspension peices needed to be replace and they treated the car like ****. all repair at the owners expense aswell.
i think it cool that you buddy has his car in the move dont get me wrong, but i would be very skeptical as to let people i dont even know beat on my car.
according to one guy when he lent him his car for the 2nd movie, they said they would pay him 500 a day that they had the car. now when he got his car back, they only gave him 250 ( this was only for the time that the car was on camera, so about 12hrs od shooting.
on top of this, when he got the car back there was no clutch left, suspension peices needed to be replace and they treated the car like ****. all repair at the owners expense aswell.
i think it cool that you buddy has his car in the move dont get me wrong, but i would be very skeptical as to let people i dont even know beat on my car.
very interesting. i'm glad my car is too ugly for anyone to want to shoot a movie with
