Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

negative split

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #101  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
Nope.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 12:20 PM
  #102  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Originally Posted by junito1
are e6x's? capable of neg. split?
Nope; at least not directly through the E6K/E6X programs. However, I'm interested in seeing if it's possible to modify a file directly and change the two split tables and then see if the ECU actually fires the trailing ahead of the leading. Plan on working on it today.

B
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 12:31 PM
  #103  
junito1's Avatar
F**K THE SYSTEM!!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,591
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Whats does that mean... The software is whats holding it back?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #104  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Originally Posted by junito1
Whats does that mean... The software is whats holding it back?
I think so. I think its the user interface on the older programs that's disallowing it. I'd be willing to bet (not a lot, mind you!) that the ECU itself will work just fine firing trailing ahead of leading. It's just a matter of getting the data into the map by going around the user interface and modifying the file directly.

B
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 12:47 PM
  #105  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Got it all fired up. Found where the trail split stuff starts in the raw file (around Offset 800). Looks like it's a no go for negative split from what I can tell. The hex data in those spots bottoms out at 00. Don't think it's possible to go to a lower value than that. This would require a firmware revision w/ an updated user interface.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 11:09 PM
  #106  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Originally Posted by BDC
Got it all fired up. Found where the trail split stuff starts in the raw file (around Offset 800). Looks like it's a no go for negative split from what I can tell. The hex data in those spots bottoms out at 00. Don't think it's possible to go to a lower value than that. This would require a firmware revision w/ an updated user interface.

The firmware in the ECU might be bounds checking it or using it as an unsigned number. That would really kill any chances without a firmware update.

Of course, how familiar are you with negative numbers in binary? Your negative numbers are from 80 - FF where FF is -1. Or if its a 16 bit value, then FFFF to 8000 where FFFF is -1.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 01:16 AM
  #107  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Originally Posted by farberio
The firmware in the ECU might be bounds checking it or using it as an unsigned number. That would really kill any chances without a firmware update.

Of course, how familiar are you with negative numbers in binary? Your negative numbers are from 80 - FF where FF is -1. Or if its a 16 bit value, then FFFF to 8000 where FFFF is -1.
Really! I didn't know that. I might have to give that a try. I wonder if the ECU would actually fire it -1 from Leading if I set the rows in vacuum to FF each bar.

B
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 01:21 AM
  #108  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
BDC Motorsports
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 6
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Just tried taking a test E6K map and, via hex editor, changing the first 11 bars in the 0-2krpm split map from 00 to FF. Forced a change of 255 which actually showed up in the editor.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 08:11 AM
  #109  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
Do me a favor and test this out by manually spinning the CAS though. I would hate for it to fire 255deg advanced on you.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2011 | 11:58 PM
  #110  
12AllWays's Avatar
It means 12A all ways^
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Northern IN
Neg split is running your trailing timing more advanced than your leading. Correct? I am running a megsquirt Ms1, is this possible with the ms1?
Thanks
Keith
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 06:53 PM
  #111  
camman's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: utah
Originally Posted by 12AllWays
Neg split is running your trailing timing more advanced than your leading. Correct? I am running a megsquirt Ms1, is this possible with the ms1?
Thanks
Keith
only ms2 and ms3 can run negative split. this is an excellent thread btw.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 02:10 PM
  #112  
stezhead54's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers Fl
So, I read through this thread, and am impressed with the amount of actuall information in it. A thought came to my mind, and I'm not too sure how well it would work in the upper rev ranges, but for those that don't have an ecu capable of running negative split, how would just switching the wires around work? Put your trailing on the leading, and the leading on the trailing. Obviously this would only be for an n/a application though.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 05:22 PM
  #113  
t-von's Avatar
Rotor Head Extreme
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,719
Likes: 26
From: Midland Texas
Negative split is designed for low vacuum/load levels. Fact...Mazda uses it for better emissions and fuel economy. It will also quiet down the exhaust pulses a bit. I heard you should not run negative under heavy loads as it may cause detonation.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mulcryant
General Rotary Tech Support
5
Oct 4, 2015 12:18 AM
Zinraf
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Oct 1, 2015 01:09 PM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Sep 28, 2015 09:25 PM
izzolaw
1st Gen General Discussion
2
Sep 27, 2015 08:33 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 AM.