Rotary Car Performance General Rotary Car and Engine modification discussions.

Ideal Attainable Runner Length

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-05, 01:49 AM
  #1  
We come with the Hardcore

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ideal Attainable Runner Length

I know I've asked some people before; but I'd just like the input of more people.

We'll just say I'm building an All-motor rotary racecar...

Large 4port Streetport (think bridgeport, minus the bridge) built enough to make make and handle power to ~10k. 4 38mm TB's, 1.25" intake runner diameter.... how long does the over-all length of the manifold need to be (stacks to port-face)? I'm looking for a nice broad powerband (car will get a lot of street use) but I've also got manifold simplicity and under-hood room to think about.

Any input appreciated; and please give a little input, not just "18inches". ~CE
Old 03-22-05, 05:30 PM
  #2  
Full Member

 
shinjuku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well from what I have seen and read most theories on how to calculate the ideal runner length for particular application are based around fairly simplistic mathematical models of a piston engine induction process. An example is the book "The Scientific Design of Exhuast Manifolds" as recomended by RICE RACING in the past.

Now even if these models hold true for your rotary setup they are still only a guide so that you have a starting point for experiments. That is a starting point to make your first experimental manifold and then get it on the dyno and experiment with different versions of the manifold, with longer and shorter runners, to find out which one effects the power curve in the desired manner.

So I would be wary of anyone stating some magic runner length that's gonna suit all applications.
Old 03-22-05, 05:57 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
ronbros3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Austin TX.
Posts: 862
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HEY nothing will work well unless it is variable length, it has to be adjustable in its length, thanks RON
Old 03-22-05, 06:23 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
grantmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you could try making the set-up as long as possible and still fit it under the hood, then because your using hose-clamps to secure the TBs you would just keep trimming off the manifold until the power peaked where you want it to. This is very subjective but it would work fine with some patience.
Grant
Old 03-22-05, 08:05 PM
  #5  
'Tuna'

 
crispeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Miami,Fl,USA
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by grantmac
you could try making the set-up as long as possible and still fit it under the hood, then because your using hose-clamps to secure the TBs you would just keep trimming off the manifold until the power peaked where you want it to. This is very subjective but it would work fine with some patience.
Grant
And that's the only true proven method of finding proper length for both exhaust and intake.
Old 03-22-05, 09:16 PM
  #6  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,506
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by grantmac
you could try making the set-up as long as possible and still fit it under the hood, then because your using hose-clamps to secure the TBs you would just keep trimming off the manifold until the power peaked where you want it to.
This is exactly how my new intake manifold is being designed, except room will not be a problem. (think trombone)
Old 03-22-05, 09:23 PM
  #7  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,506
Received 416 Likes on 296 Posts
Originally Posted by grantmac
you could try making the set-up as long as possible and still fit it under the hood, then because your using hose-clamps to secure the TBs you would just keep trimming off the manifold until the power peaked where you want it to.
This is exactly how my new intake manifold is being designed, except room will not be a problem. (think trombone)
Old 03-23-05, 07:41 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
grantmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by peejay
This is exactly how my new intake manifold is being designed, except room will not be a problem. (think trombone)

Yeah but you've only got 2 runners to deal with
But seriously I thought of trying an electrically variable length set-up at one time, but ultimately I decided that I would never be capable of feeling the difference unless it was long enough to get 1st level harmonics.
Grant
Old 03-24-05, 10:18 PM
  #9  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
oregano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: miss, Ontario
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm, been wondering about these things myself cuz i wana design my own manifold. first i think u have to deside whether u are gona use a vacuum chamber design, individual TB desing, or a stock type dynamic design. heres a graph of dyno power with dif. length stock type designs...
Attached Thumbnails Ideal Attainable Runner Length-manifoldlengthdyno.jpg  
Old 03-27-05, 07:19 PM
  #10  
Rotary Freak

iTrader: (10)
 
RexRyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,943
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
18" equal length
Old 04-06-05, 07:05 PM
  #11  
Bridge Port Freak

iTrader: (12)
 
ArmyOfOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alzey, Germany
Posts: 1,029
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm gonna have to check this out to see if the Racing Beat 6 port is this length. I'll post my findings.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 03:25 PM
eplusz
General Rotary Tech Support
15
10-07-15 04:04 PM
WANKfactor
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
09-29-15 01:14 PM



Quick Reply: Ideal Attainable Runner Length



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.