HARDCORE rotary TECH !
#1
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
HARDCORE rotary TECH !
I know you guys like good information, well tell me if this **** is good
http://www.mymazdarotary.com/mazda_r...paper_html.htm
regards.
Pete
http://www.mymazdarotary.com/mazda_r...paper_html.htm
regards.
Pete
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,829
Received 2,597 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
Originally posted by RICE RACING
Done some calcs (how typical!)
How is a VE% of 118% @ 6000rpm....
PP's rock !, Very low specific fuel consumption too
Done some calcs (how typical!)
How is a VE% of 118% @ 6000rpm....
PP's rock !, Very low specific fuel consumption too
mike
#6
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: l.a.
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
when does the far trailing plug fire? it seems that they'd have to fire all 3 plugs together or sequentially w/ a very close split in order to fire the ft plug before the squish is generated.
#7
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Thread Starter
All three are fired together, NO SPLIT.
none of the race engines either from the factory or customer teams using three plug set up run ANY other way, even two plug engines run no split.
The resons have been documented many times before, but basically no split = more power, more efficiency, better faster burn. To people who say it cannot be done on turbo RE's, I have been running no split at highish boost (20psi) for a long time with no problems.
none of the race engines either from the factory or customer teams using three plug set up run ANY other way, even two plug engines run no split.
The resons have been documented many times before, but basically no split = more power, more efficiency, better faster burn. To people who say it cannot be done on turbo RE's, I have been running no split at highish boost (20psi) for a long time with no problems.
Trending Topics
#9
Rotary Freak
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: l.a.
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rice,
do can you post some of that documentation proving why no split has more power, i'm interested in seeing it. does no split have more power throughout the whole powerband, at all rpm ranges, off and on boost, part throttle and wot? or does it just have more power at certain parameters? which would allow for a more complete combustion, split or no split?
do can you post some of that documentation proving why no split has more power, i'm interested in seeing it. does no split have more power throughout the whole powerband, at all rpm ranges, off and on boost, part throttle and wot? or does it just have more power at certain parameters? which would allow for a more complete combustion, split or no split?
#13
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
datfast1
Old School and Other Rotary
18
06-20-19 10:53 PM
Under PSI
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
19
09-23-15 11:47 PM