is the 13b-re and 20b mounts the same?
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Oshawa, Ont.
is the 13b-re and 20b mounts the same?
jus as the topic says. i was wondering if they are the same. or if there is anyone on here that knows sumone that will know?
thx junior
thx junior
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 587
Likes: 2
From: Sydney, Australia
The 20B-REW + 13B-REW engines from the Cosmo are not both the same.
The right side mount is the same.
The left side mount is different.
Its different as the starter motor mounting bracket suits different engines. The rubber pad that attaches to the base should be the same.
The right side mount is the same.
The left side mount is different.
Its different as the starter motor mounting bracket suits different engines. The rubber pad that attaches to the base should be the same.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 587
Likes: 2
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally posted by 87GTR
[B]cosmo did not come with 13B-REW it came with 13B - RE
[B]cosmo did not come with 13B-REW it came with 13B - RE
The 90-95 13B-REW & 20B-REW that appeared in the JC Cosmo was termed REW as reference to " rotary engine double" turbo. Where "W" sounds like "double" to the Japanese.
The fact that its got 13B-RE on the plenum doesn't change its official engine status from Mazda. The 20B has 3-rotor on its plenum but its still a 20B-REW engine.
The 92-02 13B-REW that appeared in the FD RX-7 series was designated the same as the configuration was the same.
Photo Diety
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Thing is, the 2 rotor in the Cosmo and the 2 rotor in the FD are not identical internally which gives credence to the RE vs. REW story, no? I can't see Mazda calling two different generation engines the same thing.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by rx7tt95
Thing is, the 2 rotor in the Cosmo and the 2 rotor in the FD are not identical internally which gives credence to the RE vs. REW story, no? I can't see Mazda calling two different generation engines the same thing.
Thing is, the 2 rotor in the Cosmo and the 2 rotor in the FD are not identical internally which gives credence to the RE vs. REW story, no? I can't see Mazda calling two different generation engines the same thing.
mike