SRT-10 viper
#51
Just in time to die
iTrader: (1)
Wow vipers that can't turn for **** and have 70/30 weight distribution, FD's that weigh in at 3200lbs this thread has got to be one of the most misinformed threads I have ever read on this board. Too funny and I happen to own both cars thank you both highly modded so I know them inside and out. My Viper turns just fine thank you and my FD last weighed in at just below 2700lbs.
-S-
-S-
#52
PURIST
iTrader: (43)
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
Funny stuff... I have had friends with Vipers and they are all SLOWER than my car was with stock twins.
Plenty have trapped 120 plus on the twins. Brooks Weisnblat trapped 120 plus on 14 psi on a hot Floida day, as a matter of fact 11.4 @ 120.40. Anthony from T@R trapped ~123 on the twins.
Boosted7...
Ported-motor/stock twins/pump gas*
-10.98 @ 122.9mph
-11.08 @ 125.3mph
New Z06's which are faster than Vipers have gone down to tt cars.
Plenty have trapped 120 plus on the twins. Brooks Weisnblat trapped 120 plus on 14 psi on a hot Floida day, as a matter of fact 11.4 @ 120.40. Anthony from T@R trapped ~123 on the twins.
Boosted7...
Ported-motor/stock twins/pump gas*
-10.98 @ 122.9mph
-11.08 @ 125.3mph
New Z06's which are faster than Vipers have gone down to tt cars.
#53
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zero R
Wow vipers that can't turn for **** and have 70/30 weight distribution, FD's that weigh in at 3200lbs this thread has got to be one of the most misinformed threads I have ever read on this board. Too funny and I happen to own both cars thank you both highly modded so I know them inside and out. My Viper turns just fine thank you and my FD last weighed in at just below 2700lbs.
-S-
-S-
#54
PURIST
iTrader: (43)
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
New Z06's which are faster than Vipers have gone down to tt cars.
New Z06's trap almost 130mph in stock trim. I have personally seen a stock one go 11.2 at 129mph with ET streets. Are you going to tell me there are twins FD's running 130mph traps to take one out on the highway? You have no idea what you are talking about my friend. Remember i am talking about on the highway too, not from a dig.
-Austin
#55
Senior Member
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
New Z06's trap almost 130mph in stock trim. I have personally seen a stock one go 11.2 at 129mph with ET streets. Are you going to tell me there are twins FD's running 130mph traps to take one out on the highway? You have no idea what you are talking about my friend. Remember i am talking about on the highway too, not from a dig.
-Austin
-Austin
I have stock twins. Guess what? I've not only pulled Vipers but a new ZO6 (by ~ 2 cars) from a 70 - 130 mph roll (3 times in fact - he kept coming back for more).
ZO6s are NOT trapping 129 mph on street tires. On average, they are trapping 122 - 127 mph with an EXCELLENT driver on street tires (ie Ranger at the helm).
BTW, 2 benefits for an FD vs a Viper on a roll:
1) significantly lower Cd & frontal area (.29 vs a .39 is HUGE on a high speed roll)
2) cool/high airflow for the turbos
This forum is full of little gromets that think they know everything, when in fact, they are rotary neophytes. This is why I don't post my kills here anymore - too many gromets with big mouths always calling "BS" when they are significantly misinformed and/or have a general lack of racing experience.
-Matt
#56
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
On 14psi? Nope. . Absolutly impossible..
Secondly, 14 psi is not what the poster said, he said 1 bar. 14.7 and on the on the PFC that over 16 psi.
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
Rich...goodfellafd3s on his BNR stage 3s put down 421 at 17psi...and those are pretty much the king of twins. Unless you had BNRs your car was not faster than a viper...
You also don't take into account intercooled cars make more hp going down the road than sitting on the dyno due to charge temperature drop. Peter Farrell stated he made 20 more hp on average. In hot weather he stated the race the car was slower.
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
These guys running 120s on twins are NOT stock twins...they are modified twins such as BNRs. Boostn7 i have no idea if he is full of **** or im missing something...he is saying hes going 125s with a 1.7 sixty foot...thus making him go 128s without a launch...which is physically impossible on twins.
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
But even...this guy has STOCK twins meaning he is trapping 115 and if people would relize ET does not matter on the highway. You can run 9s and trap 115(not possible...just an example) and get beat by a mid 12s car that does 120. Look up the Trap speed of a viper and look at his trap speed. That guy didnt know how to drive or was in 5th gear.
#57
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
New Z06's trap almost 130mph in stock trim.
I have personally seen a stock one go 11.2 at 129mph with ET streets. Are you going to tell me there are twins FD's running 130mph traps to take one out on the highway?
I have personally seen a stock one go 11.2 at 129mph with ET streets. Are you going to tell me there are twins FD's running 130mph traps to take one out on the highway?
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
You have no idea what you are talking about my friend. Remember i am talking about on the highway too, not from a dig.
-Austin
-Austin
Sitting at a the tree the IC heat soaks and charge temps rise, slowing down the car. On a roll the IC charge temps DROP making more hp. I have talked in depth with Corky Bell about this...does he also not know what he is talking about?
#58
Top's always down
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by turbodrx7
On 14psi? Nope. Absolutly impossible. Rich...goodfellafd3s on his BNR stage 3s put down 421 at 17psi...
now..I don't know really, but the last time I checked, 10.5 was a quicker ET than 12.whatever...so...yeah, that's that.
www.haterclub.com
#60
Don't worry be happy...
iTrader: (1)
Mr rx-7 tt ,
Why are arguing with a 19 year old? I don't even think he knows who Brook Weinsblat even is. This guy was 10 years old when Brooks was kicking ***.
May 16, 1987
Car:
94 RX-7
Gender:
Male
Location:
Bel Air, MD
turbodrx7,
Nothing against you but sorry man I remember Brooks, and if you knew about him you wouldn't be arguing. I also remember had had stockers because of the driveability factor.
Check his time and trap speed. He does say that he modified just about everything on his car but does not say exactly what. Too bad
http://viper.dragtimes.com/rx7.html
now compare:
http://viper.dragtimes.com/dragstrip.html
See the first story:
http://www.rx7.org/Robinette/war_stories.htm
Why are arguing with a 19 year old? I don't even think he knows who Brook Weinsblat even is. This guy was 10 years old when Brooks was kicking ***.
May 16, 1987
Car:
94 RX-7
Gender:
Male
Location:
Bel Air, MD
turbodrx7,
Nothing against you but sorry man I remember Brooks, and if you knew about him you wouldn't be arguing. I also remember had had stockers because of the driveability factor.
Check his time and trap speed. He does say that he modified just about everything on his car but does not say exactly what. Too bad
http://viper.dragtimes.com/rx7.html
now compare:
http://viper.dragtimes.com/dragstrip.html
See the first story:
http://www.rx7.org/Robinette/war_stories.htm
Last edited by Montego; 11-11-06 at 08:04 PM.
#62
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by montego
Mr rx-7 tt ,
Why are arguing with a 19 year old? I don't even think he knows who Brook Weinsblat even is. This guy was 10 years old when Brooks was kicking ***.
May 16, 1987
Car:
94 RX-7
Gender:
Male
Location:
Bel Air, MD
Why are arguing with a 19 year old? I don't even think he knows who Brook Weinsblat even is. This guy was 10 years old when Brooks was kicking ***.
May 16, 1987
Car:
94 RX-7
Gender:
Male
Location:
Bel Air, MD
Montego,
You are right, my apologies...also thanks for the chuckle.
#63
rotary sensei
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
^^Hey, those are my Fikses! I bought them from the guy who bought the car from Brian Dowling, who bought the car from Brooks. Pretty cool, huh ?
The guy who bought Brook's car wrecked it two weeks later.
Long live the Fikses!
Oh and Brook's replaced the 7 with a Viper GTS with mods. (Headers, exhaust, etc.) His Rx-7 was slightly faster with only 360 rwhp @ 14 psi.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Dodge-Viper-Timeslip-1627.html
Quote from Brook's.
"11.4 was decent back then for stock turbos...The Viper is great, had it over 6 years now.... If I had more garage space, I would buy a 3rd gen RX-7 in a second.... "
Last edited by Mr rx-7 tt; 11-11-06 at 10:14 PM.
#64
PURIST
iTrader: (43)
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
Montego,
You are right, my apologies...also thanks for the chuckle.
#65
T O R Q U E!
iTrader: (24)
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
^^Hey, those are my Fikses! I bought them from the guy who bought the car from Brian Dowling, who bought the car from Brooks. Pretty cool, huh ?
#67
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
one thing thats good about the stock twins is the power curve. I have beaten two different single fd's, on low boost, that both made alittle more rwhp than my stock twin car.
Point i am making is 360 is just a peak number. the importantance is the area above the curve or your average rwhp from say 5k to 8k.
Point i am making is 360 is just a peak number. the importantance is the area above the curve or your average rwhp from say 5k to 8k.
#69
Originally Posted by 93VRTouring
I'm not sure why those numbers are stamped on the VIN plate like that, my friends 94 PEP says the same thing(3200lbs), but if you read the third gen section, you'll see a guy just weighed his stock FD base with 2 gallons of gas, and after his math for adding in the extra 18 gallons and minus the extra turbos he was carrying, his car weighed 2780lbs w/o driver. And his car hasn't had weight reduction.
#70
Originally Posted by Mr rx-7 tt
Rich,
The guy who bought Brook's car wrecked it two weeks later.
Long live the Fikses!
Oh and Brook's replaced the 7 with a Viper GTS with mods. (Headers, exhaust, etc.) His Rx-7 was slightly faster with only 360 rwhp @ 14 psi.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Dodge-Viper-Timeslip-1627.html
Quote from Brook's.
"11.4 was decent back then for stock turbos...The Viper is great, had it over 6 years now.... If I had more garage space, I would buy a 3rd gen RX-7 in a second.... "
The guy who bought Brook's car wrecked it two weeks later.
Long live the Fikses!
Oh and Brook's replaced the 7 with a Viper GTS with mods. (Headers, exhaust, etc.) His Rx-7 was slightly faster with only 360 rwhp @ 14 psi.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Dodge-Viper-Timeslip-1627.html
Quote from Brook's.
"11.4 was decent back then for stock turbos...The Viper is great, had it over 6 years now.... If I had more garage space, I would buy a 3rd gen RX-7 in a second.... "
omfg, that pic seriously, no bullshit, just brought a couple tears to my eyes (looks just like my car....) I wonder when they're gonna auction that thing off
#71
silver ghost
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home of the Rolex 24
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Originally Posted by matty
one thing thats good about the stock twins is the power curve. I have beaten two different single fd's, on low boost, that both made alittle more rwhp than my stock twin car.
Point i am making is 360 is just a peak number. the importantance is the area above the curve or your average rwhp from say 5k to 8k.
Point i am making is 360 is just a peak number. the importantance is the area above the curve or your average rwhp from say 5k to 8k.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Roy Johnson Jr
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
55
11-07-02 10:08 AM