How do you enjoy auto-x?
#76
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MIA
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Travis R
For reference, we are looking into holding a divisional in S. Texas. The site owners require us to carry a $5M liability policy.
#77
Haven't we ALL heard this
If you think you have learned everything you can from your car. Let the fastest person at your local autox drive it. Normally that takes care of that notion.
James
James
#78
Post quality not quantity
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PureSephiroth
um, I can't afford to take my car to the track. Nor would I be willing with my limited driving experience. Autocross is a hell of a lot more friendly than a race track. At the autocross the worst thing I can do is nail a cone, at the track I could roll... besides, autocrossing is every bit as competitive as track racing!
That said, you can hit immovable objects at autocrosses, you can run off the tarmac into a ditch or into trees, and you can hit another car. I have been doing track events for 4-5 years, I've seen only ONE car roll and he was being a total moron. I've seen many people impact walls and that was the worst thing about their weekend...
Autocrossing is about competition and not setup as car control (but you pick it up along the way). I wish it was exclusively car control, because that is the valuable part that applies to street driving.
Track days (less a time trial) involves zero competition. The HUGE point is that they are two completely different things, yet similar. The "hardcore" groups of each don't really like the other activity. I have done both and I don't autocross because I'm not getting younger and I prefer seat time over the competition because that's how _I_ measure the worth of an event. It _IS_ different for everyone, do what you want to do, life is too short to quibble and grumble that you only got 4 minutes of seat time. They are both hard on cars, I think in some ways, autocross is harder on the car than track, and vice-versa. Track is more expensive, but I find the return more appealing to ME (may not be in your case).
I feel safer at track days for several reasons:
Ambulance standing by with helicopter to airlift you
Corner workers that are paid to watch out for you and trained to come to your rescue (by and large, not all situations)
People are less close to the racing surface, less risk of hitting a person (too many idiots I've seen at autocrosses with their back to the course <sigh>)
Depending on the track, less immoveable objects to hit
You aren't at the discretion of the course designer du jour who may not know what they are doing and setup a "dangerous" course (uhm, one place I ran, we were accelerating toward fuel tanks...and the organization running the event is very competent and that was as good as it got for that arena)
That's the tip of the iceberg. This whole thread is highly opinionated. It's how you look at the facts as to which you enjoy (as well as the size of your bank account). Autocross can be every bit as expensive as track days depending on how hard you run the car and how competitive you are.
Summary:
To each his own. Do what YOU want to do at the level you can afford to. If you aren't having fun, you need to do something about it.
Last edited by bond007; 07-29-04 at 10:38 AM.
#79
trying to build a racecar
Originally Posted by Fatman0203
5 Million$ insurance policy?
#80
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MIA
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Travis R
That's correct. But if it makes you feel any better that is the high end. I think most times it's around $1-$2 Million.
#81
That said, you can hit immovable objects at autocrosses, you can run off the tarmac into a ditch or into trees, and you can hit another car. I have been doing track events for 4-5 years, I've seen only ONE car roll and he was being a total moron. I've seen many people impact walls and that was the worst thing about their weekend... [/QUOTE]
SCCA has specific regulations about distance and course set up from immovable objects. You are at fall less risk hitting an immovable object auto-xing than a wall at a track. A review of any tracks safety stats compared to the SCCA national SoloII program will indicate that.
Autocrossing is about competition and not setup as car control (but you pick it up along the way). I wish it was exclusively car control, because that is the valuable part that applies to street driving.
Auto-x is a sigificantly closer skill set to daily driving then tracking. You typically never exceed freeway speeds. A majority auto-xers use cars which they run on the street using street tires. In auto-x it is very difficult to make corrections in driving style to make up for poor setups due to you are only running a lap at a time for usually less than 60 sec. You do not have the distances on a track to make up for any minor driving errors. When was the last time a road race was loss by 100ths of a sec? Auto-x is all about car set up and car control.
I feel safer at track days for several reasons:
Ambulance standing by with helicopter to airlift you
Corner workers that are paid to watch out for you and trained to come to your rescue (by and large, not all situations)
People are less close to the racing surface, less risk of hitting a person (too many idiots I've seen at autocrosses with their back to the course <sigh>)
Depending on the track, less immoveable objects to hit
You aren't at the discretion of the course designer du jour who may not know what they are doing and setup a "dangerous" course (uhm, one place I ran, we were accelerating toward fuel tanks...and the organization running the event is very competent and that was as good as it got for that arena)
No driver is at the discretion of the course designer. Every driver has the option of discussing "concerns" with the event chairperson and safety steward. If you were really concerned about the fuel tanks, then why did you run? You were willing to risk your life or damage to your car for an auto-x? It doesn't make sense.
I sorry, you are painting a very inaccurate picture of auto-x. I do not think Auto-x is better or worse than track. They are different animals. I have done and enjoy both. Tracking and auto-x require different skill sets, which are rewarding in their own way.
Russ
New Competitor Coordinator
SCCA - SFR - Sacramento Chapter SoloII Program
SM #3 BMW E30-M3
Looking for a 2nd Gen, RX-7 turbo
to create a ASP or BP Vette killer.
SCCA has specific regulations about distance and course set up from immovable objects. You are at fall less risk hitting an immovable object auto-xing than a wall at a track. A review of any tracks safety stats compared to the SCCA national SoloII program will indicate that.
Autocrossing is about competition and not setup as car control (but you pick it up along the way). I wish it was exclusively car control, because that is the valuable part that applies to street driving.
Auto-x is a sigificantly closer skill set to daily driving then tracking. You typically never exceed freeway speeds. A majority auto-xers use cars which they run on the street using street tires. In auto-x it is very difficult to make corrections in driving style to make up for poor setups due to you are only running a lap at a time for usually less than 60 sec. You do not have the distances on a track to make up for any minor driving errors. When was the last time a road race was loss by 100ths of a sec? Auto-x is all about car set up and car control.
I feel safer at track days for several reasons:
Ambulance standing by with helicopter to airlift you
Corner workers that are paid to watch out for you and trained to come to your rescue (by and large, not all situations)
People are less close to the racing surface, less risk of hitting a person (too many idiots I've seen at autocrosses with their back to the course <sigh>)
Depending on the track, less immoveable objects to hit
You aren't at the discretion of the course designer du jour who may not know what they are doing and setup a "dangerous" course (uhm, one place I ran, we were accelerating toward fuel tanks...and the organization running the event is very competent and that was as good as it got for that arena)
No driver is at the discretion of the course designer. Every driver has the option of discussing "concerns" with the event chairperson and safety steward. If you were really concerned about the fuel tanks, then why did you run? You were willing to risk your life or damage to your car for an auto-x? It doesn't make sense.
I sorry, you are painting a very inaccurate picture of auto-x. I do not think Auto-x is better or worse than track. They are different animals. I have done and enjoy both. Tracking and auto-x require different skill sets, which are rewarding in their own way.
Russ
New Competitor Coordinator
SCCA - SFR - Sacramento Chapter SoloII Program
SM #3 BMW E30-M3
Looking for a 2nd Gen, RX-7 turbo
to create a ASP or BP Vette killer.
Last edited by RussinStk; 07-29-04 at 12:38 PM.
#82
Post quality not quantity
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I sorry, you are painting a very inaccurate picture of auto-x. I do not think Auto-x is better or worse than track. They are different animals. I have done and enjoy both. Tracking and auto-x require different skill sets, which are rewarding in their own way.
Personally, it doesn't float my boat anymore. Yeah, I see pictures of cars in the maze of cones and part of me wants to go run them, but my life is too busy to spend a weekend on it.
Do what you want to do. The original topic was "how do you enjoy autocross". Man, if you don't enjoy it, go do something else. Life is too short!
SCCA has specific regulations about distance and course set up from immovable objects. You are at fall less risk hitting an immovable object auto-xing than a wall at a track. A review of any tracks safety stats compared to the SCCA national SoloII program will indicate that.
Incidents DO happen despite "good" planning. Relative risk of track vs. autocross? Those numbers are really hard to find. I haven't really seen any numbers ... just the endorphine-induced rationalization that we ALL use to rationalize our hobby as "sane".
I think that both sides will argue until the end of time about each activity being superior to the other and again, I'm not trying to put down autocross, but don't let the chemicals in your brain dilute you...ANY FORM OF MOTORSPORTS IS DANGEROUS.
So is staying at home (where most accidents happen)!
Auto-x is a sigificantly closer skill set to daily driving then tracking. You typically never exceed freeway speeds. A majority auto-xers use cars which they run on the street using street tires.
You certainly aren't driving around the street trying to click off quick times between designated points? Competition makes you do things you normally wouldn't. Car control is what you learn and being able to calmly handle an out of control vehicle along with vision is what applies to the street.
In auto-x it is very difficult to make corrections in driving style to make up for poor setups due to you are only running a lap at a time for usually less than 60 sec. You do not have the distances on a track to make up for any minor driving errors. When was the last time a road race was loss by 100ths of a sec? Auto-x is all about car set up and car control.
The competition and the pace of the turns...
You still set your car up for the track and you still have car control and you have an instructor with you where a good number of autocross clubs do not allow passengers to critique your driving as you go and provide feedback (which is what can make learning how to autocross what seems to be an insurmountable goal, which I experienced, and when I found a venue where I could have a passenger, it made it easier to understand what I was doing wrong).
Road races are lost by split seconds, maybe not 100th's of a second, but if you look at the total competition time compared to the time difference between places, it would be comparable. And we aren't comparing road race...that's yet another Pandora's box
No driver is at the discretion of the course designer. Every driver has the option of discussing "concerns" with the event chairperson and safety steward. If you were really concerned about the fuel tanks, then why did you run? You were willing to risk your life or damage to your car for an auto-x? It doesn't make sense.
Last edited by bond007; 07-30-04 at 12:11 PM.
#83
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MIA
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are the times btw. Not tooo shabby for my for time and 20psi in the tires. http://autox.carlc.com/er072504.htm
#84
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
94 Javier Aparicio Mazda RX7 67.807 o/c 64.117 o/c DNS DNW 0
Last place. Didn't make your last run. Did not work. 0pts.
Last place doesn't matter. However, 10 seconds is a long way back from the leader. You screwed up and didn't get a third run. DNS means did not start. Then you didn't do your part to help out by working (DNW). In order to run these events, people must work the course. Those who don't work are not welcomed back in many clubs. If you didn't work, that is very irresponsible.
Last place. Didn't make your last run. Did not work. 0pts.
Last place doesn't matter. However, 10 seconds is a long way back from the leader. You screwed up and didn't get a third run. DNS means did not start. Then you didn't do your part to help out by working (DNW). In order to run these events, people must work the course. Those who don't work are not welcomed back in many clubs. If you didn't work, that is very irresponsible.
Last edited by adam c; 07-30-04 at 04:34 PM.
#85
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MIA
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
94 Javier Aparicio Mazda RX7 67.807 o/c 64.117 o/c DNS DNW 0
Last place. Didn't make your last run. Did not work. 0pts.
Last place doesn't matter. However, 10 seconds is a long way back from the leader. You screwed up and didn't get a third run. DNS means did not start. Then you didn't do your part to help out by working (DNW). In order to run these events, people must work the course. Those who don't work are not welcomed back in many clubs. If you didn't work, that is very irresponsible.
Last place. Didn't make your last run. Did not work. 0pts.
Last place doesn't matter. However, 10 seconds is a long way back from the leader. You screwed up and didn't get a third run. DNS means did not start. Then you didn't do your part to help out by working (DNW). In order to run these events, people must work the course. Those who don't work are not welcomed back in many clubs. If you didn't work, that is very irresponsible.
#86
DFW Drunk by Proxy
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Valley Ranch, Tx
Posts: 2,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by adam c
94 Javier Aparicio Mazda RX7 67.807 o/c 64.117 o/c DNS DNW 0
Last place. Didn't make your last run. Did not work. 0pts.
Last place doesn't matter. However, 10 seconds is a long way back from the leader. You screwed up and didn't get a third run. DNS means did not start. Then you didn't do your part to help out by working (DNW). In order to run these events, people must work the course. Those who don't work are not welcomed back in many clubs. If you didn't work, that is very irresponsible.
Last place. Didn't make your last run. Did not work. 0pts.
Last place doesn't matter. However, 10 seconds is a long way back from the leader. You screwed up and didn't get a third run. DNS means did not start. Then you didn't do your part to help out by working (DNW). In order to run these events, people must work the course. Those who don't work are not welcomed back in many clubs. If you didn't work, that is very irresponsible.
You have a LOT to learn about autocross if those are the results you posted. You got last- and by a LONG shot- yet you don't believe there's any more that you can learn?
You didn't complete your worker assignment? That's just plain unacceptable. If you had an emergency, you should have notified the man in charge of worker assignments and explained it to him. They will usually understand. As it was, you just bailed on your assignment and left them shorthanded. That was poor, poor judgement.
As for the lack of a tach- that's irrelevant. You should NEVER have the time, nor the reason, to look down at your tach. If you don't know how many RPM's your car is turning without looking- well, that's another thing you can learn.
Stop making excuses for your performance and use it as a learning experience for next time. You can only go up from there!
Last edited by Umrswimr; 07-30-04 at 07:16 PM.
#87
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: MIA
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Umrswimr
Stop making excuses for your performance and use it as a learning experience for next time. You can only go up from there!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post