Race Car Tech Discuss anything related to road racing and auto X.

Effects of tire size

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 09:59 AM
  #1  
SHPNOUT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 482
Likes: 7
From: BENICIA, CA
Effects of tire size

Hey Guys,

Need some skilled opinions.

I am going from 245/45 16 to 275/40-17.

The 245 set up weighed in at 36lbs. The 275 set up weighs in at 44lbs.

The 245 diam. was 24.5. The 275 is 25.3.

Typically I run at Thunderhill and run consistant 2:05's +- a few .10ths on the 245 set up.

The Question:

Will the increase in tread surface area, lower sidewall be enough to over come the larger diameter and increased weight, as it relates to lap times.

I expect that breaking distance will increase, but with more grip I won't need to break as much. Exit speed should therefore be faster, which is good as my gearing will be taller due to tire diameter.

You opinions please......

Thanks
Niles
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 10:05 AM
  #2  
Umrswimr's Avatar
DFW Drunk by Proxy
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,291
Likes: 0
From: Valley Ranch, Tx
Honestly, I think the extra tire width should provide a HUGE advantage. Your car might not accelrate *quite* as quickly, but you'll be able to carry much more speed through the corners.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 10:52 AM
  #3  
SHPNOUT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 482
Likes: 7
From: BENICIA, CA
Thanks Umr........

Also forgot to mention rin width....245 were on stock 8's and the 275 are on 10's.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 11:38 AM
  #4  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
I think that the extra rubber will help you in every aspect except accelleration (minimal loss). More rubber on the road should mean better stopping, and cornering ability. You may have to do some fine tuning, but once that is done, your lap times should go down.

This all assumes that you are replacing your old tires with the same brand/model tire.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 12:03 PM
  #5  
SHPNOUT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 482
Likes: 7
From: BENICIA, CA
All things are equal. Wider, taller, heavier tire and wheel are the only change.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 03:43 PM
  #6  
MPM's Avatar
MPM
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Alabama just east of B'ham
This reply is just for reference.

On a SpecMiata the tire to have is the 205 width. The 225 width is better in the curves but given a long enough straight the 205 shod car will pass the 225. The reason is the gearing advantage of the lower profile 205 tire.

Having said that your on your own as the only way to really know if the 17 is better than the 16 is back to back testing or just compare your track times from before.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:03 PM
  #7  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by MPM
This reply is just for reference.

On a SpecMiata the tire to have is the 205 width. The 225 width is better in the curves but given a long enough straight the 205 shod car will pass the 225. The reason is the gearing advantage of the lower profile 205 tire.

Having said that your on your own as the only way to really know if the 17 is better than the 16 is back to back testing or just compare your track times from before.
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought the miata spec cars run on the same size rims. In that case, a 225 tire is probably too wide for the same rim as the 205.

In the case of this thread, the wheels are 2" wider to accomodate the wider tires.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:16 PM
  #8  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Doesn't spec Miata run on the spec tire from Hankook?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:22 PM
  #9  
speedturn's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 2
From: Rocket City, Alabama
The wider track width will help you out cornering wise; less weight transfer in the corners.

The heavier weight will kill your acceleration in the lower gears, but not make much difference in 4th gear. You will have 4 new huge flywheels that you have to spin up when you want to accelerate.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:32 PM
  #10  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by speedturn
The wider track width will help you out cornering wise; less weight transfer in the corners.
Weight transfer has absolutely nothing to do with tire size. No matter what tire, spring or shock you bolt to the car the amount of weight transfer will always be the same.

weight transfer
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 04:39 PM
  #11  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by speedturn
The wider track width will help you out cornering wise; less weight transfer in the corners.

The heavier weight will kill your acceleration in the lower gears, but not make much difference in 4th gear. You will have 4 new huge flywheels that you have to spin up when you want to accelerate.
Actually, if you have enough power, the extra weight will make no difference in the lower gears, and a bigger difference in the higher gears.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #12  
SHPNOUT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 482
Likes: 7
From: BENICIA, CA
Remember, only changing tire size, width, height and weight. Increasing all.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #13  
SHPNOUT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 482
Likes: 7
From: BENICIA, CA
Anybody else have first hand experience?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 05:17 PM
  #14  
SHPNOUT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 482
Likes: 7
From: BENICIA, CA
MPM-- good info - thanks
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 07:04 PM
  #15  
Fritz Flynn's Avatar
All out Track Freak!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (263)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 413
From: Charlottesville VA 22901
It will make a huge difference if you use the same type tires. I've driven on about everything and the fastest setup is the 285 18 30 size but the 275 40 17 is great for track use because the tires are very popular so there is lots of variety also its a lot of tire so they don't get as hot as some other setups. This of course means they stay sticky longer and last longer.

A spec miata already has plenty of tire it needs more power. The fd has plenty of power it needs more tire
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2004 | 11:32 PM
  #16  
TracyRX7's Avatar
FD = Mr. Toad's Wild Ride
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
As FYI a 275/40/R17 isn't a lower sidewall than 245/45/R16. The height number is proportionate to the width, not a direct measure. The best tire calculator/comparsion tool I've found is: http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html

I'd think the improved breaking distances (provided you have enough braking power to lock up the new tires without melting your rotors) and cornering will make up for your loss of acceleration (since you can hopefully accelerate longer and carry more speed through the corner meaning you have to accelerate less).

Good luck out there.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 09:22 AM
  #17  
SHPNOUT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 482
Likes: 7
From: BENICIA, CA
That's what I was thinking.

For Fritz... If the 285 has proven to be the best, would you prefer to have the 275 on 17's if the rear end was changed to say a 4.3? Or do you prefer the way the 18's feel on the Track.?

Thanks Guys,
Niles
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 10:11 AM
  #18  
Travis R's Avatar
trying to build a racecar
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 580
Likes: 1
From: Austin, Tx.
I don't think the braking is going to get better with a taller and heavier setup than before.
I think laterally is the only direction you might have improved things.
Whether or not it was enough can only be told by lap times.
Good luck
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 10:21 AM
  #19  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Travis R
I don't think the braking is going to get better with a taller and heavier setup than before.
If the foot print is bigger then braking will be better. The tires stop the car, not the brakes. Same reason cornering is better.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #20  
Travis R's Avatar
trying to build a racecar
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 580
Likes: 1
From: Austin, Tx.
The contact patch is wider... not longer. The tires ability to deflect (at the contact patch) is decreased front to back, but increased side to side.
Look at the kinds of racing that have tremendous acceleration and decceleration. Like drag racing and F1... they both have small diameter rims with large sidewalls so that the contact patch is both long and wide.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #21  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Here we go again. Oh boy.

Bigger contact patch gives better braking, better acceleration and better cornering. The length/width ratio of the contact patch doesn't much matter. The more rubber you put in contact with the road the better your grip. Period. You bring more rubber, you get more grip in every direction.

https://www.rx7club.com/suspension-wheels-tires-brakes-archive-112/17-vs-18-racing-mind-narrow-vs-wide-tires-292194/
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 12:52 PM
  #22  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Travis R
they both have small diameter rims with large sidewalls so that the contact patch is both long and wide.

They both have small diameter rims because the rules say that's what they must use. The tire didn't dictate the wheel, the rules dictated the wheel which dictated the tire.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #23  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Ah...Hahh! I thought we'd gone over this topic already!?

Last edited by SleepR1; Jul 28, 2004 at 01:12 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:11 PM
  #24  
SleepR1's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,131
Likes: 2
From: IN
Originally Posted by Travis R
The contact patch is wider... not longer. The tires ability to deflect (at the contact patch) is decreased front to back, but increased side to side.
Where's ArcWelder on this thread?? LOL
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #25  
adam c's Avatar
Cheap Bastard
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,370
Likes: 50
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca
Originally Posted by Travis R
The contact patch is wider... not longer. The tires ability to deflect (at the contact patch) is decreased front to back, but increased side to side.
Look at the kinds of racing that have tremendous acceleration and decceleration. Like drag racing and F1... they both have small diameter rims with large sidewalls so that the contact patch is both long and wide.
Actually, a tire with a larger diameter will have a larger contact patch front-to-back than a smaller diameter tire, given the same model tire and air pressure. A larger diameter tire will ALWAYS have a flatter curve, and thus a larger front to-back-patch. Combining this with a wider patch (which is much more significant) will provide a substantial increase in traction.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 AM.