Race Car Tech Discuss anything related to road racing and auto X.

ball joint tapered cones

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2014 | 11:09 PM
  #1  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
ball joint tapered cones

I forgot the technical name of those tapered cones people use to bolt up spherical bearings into spindles. Anyone know where to buy them? I wonder if its the same fitment as another application. Anyone know? I'm interested in fabricating front lower spherical bearings.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2014 | 11:17 AM
  #2  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
you might shoot Alex@battleversion an email. the FC BTW doesn't use a tapered ball joint in the front
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2014 | 05:46 PM
  #3  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
you might shoot Alex@battleversion an email. the FC BTW doesn't use a tapered ball joint in the front
I just saw that this morning. now I have to think of a design
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 10:55 AM
  #4  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 569
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
IIRC the thing to to is aircraft grade 18mm bolt with the head cut off and a channel cut into it so you can clamp it in the upright.

At least, I THINK it was 18mm. The common sizes for this style ball joint are 17, 18, and 19mm, and I play with a bunch of VW stuff and they're similar but different and had a couple sizes over the years.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 03:13 PM
  #5  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by peejay
IIRC the thing to to is aircraft grade 18mm bolt with the head cut off and a channel cut into it so you can clamp it in the upright.

At least, I THINK it was 18mm. The common sizes for this style ball joint are 17, 18, and 19mm, and I play with a bunch of VW stuff and they're similar but different and had a couple sizes over the years.
Rx7s are 18mm (I've measured them.). From my research VWs use 15, 17, and 19mm pinch joints. So that's no help.

Your post did give me an idea though. I'll post pictures tomorrow night :-)
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 05:51 PM
  #6  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 569
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Andrew Havas's rally car used aircraft bolts in the uprights in exactly the manner I described, and fabricated control arms.

There was a somewhat infamous picture of when he rolled at a rally after he broke his wrist from driving one-handed (broken trans - had to hold it in gear) and both control arms were pulled apart but the spherical bearings were still attached to the uprights. So the method is clearly strong enough
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 07:16 AM
  #7  
Don49's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 278
Likes: 1
From: Orrtanna,Pa
AWR Racing has a roll center correction kit that uses the early a arms with the bolt in ball joint. I just installed the kit on my 7. After looking at it, someone with good fab skills could make the same set up with a little machine work.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 10:13 AM
  #8  
abeomid's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Don49
AWR Racing has a roll center correction kit that uses the early a arms with the bolt in ball joint. I just installed the kit on my 7. After looking at it, someone with good fab skills could make the same set up with a little machine work.
Those ball joints are nice. However do check them often for signs for crack and fatigue. Not sure if Tony ever changed the design/material. But we had a couple fail on us and looking at the failure point it was tail-tail signs of fatigue similar to the attached picture:

Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 10:54 AM
  #9  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
^yup, you can see the line in mine when it broke:



the pin broke right at the pinch joint.

the reason is 2 fold:
1 - it's recessed all around like the stock pin is so the smallest diameter is only 15mm.
2 - there is nothing to tighten the spacer to the knuckle, so it's not supporting the pin at all to prevent more side loads.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 02:03 PM
  #10  
Don49's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 278
Likes: 1
From: Orrtanna,Pa
Apparently the design has been changed as there is now a step that seats at the base of the upright. Also, I don't know if it was done before, but they are now heat treated.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 11:01 PM
  #11  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by peejay
Andrew Havas's rally car used aircraft bolts in the uprights in exactly the manner I described, and fabricated control arms.

There was a somewhat infamous picture of when he rolled at a rally after he broke his wrist from driving one-handed (broken trans - had to hold it in gear) and both control arms were pulled apart but the spherical bearings were still attached to the uprights. So the method is clearly strong enough
Finished my modded AWR ball joints:



I drilled out the pinch area to 3/4" (19mm) (which took way longer than I thought it would for just 1mm larger). I notched a 3/4" grade 8 bolt and hammered it through the top and pinched it in place.

the bearing spacers and bolt length need tweaking...
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2014 | 06:46 PM
  #12  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,862
Likes: 569
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
I was considering boring them out to 19mm so I can use GM N-body control arms. The ones for, say, an '05 Malibu or G6 are about the same as FC but longer, and the rear bushing is more conducive to the kind of geometry alterations I want to make.

Y'know, I DO have a spare set of uprights...
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2014 | 09:58 PM
  #13  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
Originally Posted by eage8
Finished my modded AWR ball joints:



I drilled out the pinch area to 3/4" (19mm) (which took way longer than I thought it would for just 1mm larger). I notched a 3/4" grade 8 bolt and hammered it through the top and pinched it in place.

the bearing spacers and bolt length need tweaking...
Nice work! That is what I was thinking about doing also.
how much did you space it out compared with stock?
Are you using a snap ring to hold the bearing in place?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 09:42 AM
  #14  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by GrossPolluter
Nice work! That is what I was thinking about doing also.
how much did you space it out compared with stock?
Are you using a snap ring to hold the bearing in place?
the AWRs were spaced out 1", in the picture that is currently 0.75"... I haven't decided what I'm going to space it out yet. we'll see. I'll probably measure some stuff to find out where my roll center actually is first.

the actual ball joints are AWR units and yes they have snap rings in the containers, but you have to be careful how you clock them or they limit the articulation which sucks. your best bet is to put them towards the front of the car (caster tilts the strut back)

They're using a QA1 WPB12T bearing.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 09:51 AM
  #15  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
!

Originally Posted by eage8
the AWRs were spaced out 1", in the picture that is currently 0.75"... I haven't decided what I'm going to space it out yet. we'll see. I'll probably measure some stuff to find out where my roll center actually is first.

the actual ball joints are AWR units and yes they have snap rings in the containers, but you have to be careful how you clock them or they limit the articulation which sucks. your best bet is to put them towards the front of the car (caster tilts the strut back)

They're using a QA1 WPB12T bearing.
Cool, thanks! Do you have a picture of the limiting articulation. Is the bearing more towards one side when sitting?

At first I was thinking of a design like that, but now I am curious on a threaded length to adjust length and adjusting the position of the bearing. Hmmmmmm
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 09:59 AM
  #16  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by GrossPolluter
Cool, thanks! Do you have a picture of the limiting articulation. Is the bearing more towards one side when sitting?

At first I was thinking of a design like that, but now I am curious on a threaded length to adjust length and adjusting the position of the bearing. Hmmmmmm
Here is a picture at full droop with the original AWR everything, you can see that the bearing is at the end of it's articulation (I think it's actually the limiting factor in droop). you can fix this by either bending the ball joint more or modifying the ball joint for more articulation


I've already ordered new bearing spacers that I'm going to modify and see how they work, I'll keep my build thread updated.

are you talking about adjusting the length of the control arm? that's going to be pretty hard without putting some serious bending loads through a rod end.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 10:12 AM
  #17  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
have you checked with the car on the ground, 4 post lift, or with suspension suspension raised to your ride height? I can't see the front to back lean, but your saying more positive caster would allow more movement as well?

Also, I noticed your ball joint is mounting on top of the control arm. Mine are at the bottom
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 10:34 AM
  #18  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
Originally Posted by GrossPolluter
have you checked with the car on the ground, 4 post lift, or with suspension suspension raised to your ride height? I can't see the front to back lean, but your saying more positive caster would allow more movement as well?

Also, I noticed your ball joint is mounting on top of the control arm. Mine are at the bottom
no... positive caster actually inhibits movement a little unless you have the ball joint twisted slightly backwards....

I was saying you should put the circlip holes towards the front (on top, towards the back on the bottom) because it's less likely to interfere with things...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
joel(PA)
Group Buy & Product Dev. FD RX-7
8
Oct 4, 2015 06:07 PM
series1rx7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
Sep 27, 2015 05:46 PM
subeone
General Rotary Tech Support
0
Sep 24, 2015 09:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.