Power FC Forum Apex Power FC Support and Questions.

Power FC PFC base map compared to stock ECU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 04:07 AM
  #1  
chrislloydus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: UK
Question PFC base map compared to stock ECU

Hi everyone,

Just how close to the stock ECU is the base map on the PFC ? Im assuming its tweaked slightly ?

Cant find an answer to this question specifically using a search.

Thanks

Chris
Old Aug 21, 2002 | 09:28 PM
  #2  
Wade's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
I haven't actually sat down and ran the numbers from datalogs to compare the two, but I'm pretty sure the Power FC runs practically the same as the stock ECU, and a little leaner while boosting. This is from testing cars with the stock ECU and a wideband and then testing the same car with the Power FC. This is one reason I think people are kidding themselves when they call a Power FC a "safety mod." The more recent ones have less timing advance than the stock ECU.

Wade
Old Aug 25, 2002 | 08:23 PM
  #3  
Tim Benton's Avatar
FD title holder since 94
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 37
From: Cedartown, Ga
Atleast its a little safer on the timing issue then with it slightly retarded when compared to the stock ecu from your last sentence. That's interesting about the fuel maps though, I would have thought the base maps would have been alittle richer since they are for a DP and catback. What was the A/F's ran with the stock ecu....I think they are on your web site.

Tim
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 03:58 PM
  #4  
Wade's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
Lightly modded cars with stock ECU's were maxxing out my wideband at 10:1, my car with practically every bolt on part, no cats, and stock turbos still ran in the 11:1 range at 10 psi. The Power FC I tested had me in the 12.5:1 range at 12-13psi of boost, I wish I had tested 10 psi on the PFC now, as I suspect it was similar a:f wise but can't prove it until I get another Power FC.

Wade
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 08:25 PM
  #5  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
my recent dyno run with the stock ecu showed an A/F ratio of below 10:1 from 5k-7.5k rpm. This is running essentially stock boost.

I am running a downpipe and RB dual-tip exhaust
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 09:44 AM
  #6  
Wade's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
rynberg,

Thanks for the supporting info. I've tested several cars and the lightly modded or stock ones were always 10:1 or richer. I don't even test them any more because I'm sure this is the norm. The "3 mod rule" is not realistic.

Wade
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
TYSON's Avatar
WTF is wrong with it now?
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
From: London, ON
I find this strange that you saw the PFC as running leaner. I haven't touched mine and I have a lot of black smoke any time I get hard on the throttle. I only have the stock cat remaining.
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 05:19 PM
  #8  
DavidDeco's Avatar
I have more fun than you.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
From: Sand Key/Clearwater Beach, Florida
Originally posted by TYSON
I find this strange that you saw the PFC as running leaner. I haven't touched mine and I have a lot of black smoke any time I get hard on the throttle. I only have the stock cat remaining.
Mine was incredibly rich with the base maps based on smell, smoke, and my old Greddy 02/AF meter (4 wire) , and still is now but my FJO wideband is just being finished now so I'll know for sure.

I too have just about every bolt on except a MP (HF CAT). Of course my fuel pressure also seems really high so perhaps there's another reason.
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 11:09 PM
  #9  
Tim Benton's Avatar
FD title holder since 94
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 37
From: Cedartown, Ga
Great info on your site Wade, PMS, PFC and fuel related.

I've got the extra bung welded on the DP for the wideband so next time I go, I'll check to see what A/F I'm running at.

As far as the 3 mod rule, as long as you hold any boost spikes to a minimal degree, not hitting more than 1 psi more than your trying to hit, it seems the stock ecu can handle an intake, med IC, dp and catback with no problems at 10 to 11 psi.

Tim
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 10:47 PM
  #10  
Wade's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, WV
For those of you who are running really rich with the base maps. Maybe something else is the cause (like high fuel pressure). Maybe your maps aren't the "base mod" maps with no PIM adjustments. Maybe your car just doesn't need as much fuel as some others. Maybe your car isn't running as rich as you think. There are a lot of possible explanations.

Chuck Westbrook found pretty much the same thing on his car at 12-13 psi boost - a:f of mid 12:1 area. Although my car might not be a perfect representation of the average car, there are others who have found the same lean a:f's with the default maps.

IMO, it would be unwise to use the base maps without tuning on any car with more than a couple of bolt on parts.

BTW Tim, thanks for the compliment, glad you find the web page useful!

Wade
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
Engine Management Forum
11
Nov 9, 2015 01:15 PM
stickmantijuana
20B Forum
10
Aug 19, 2015 01:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.