Power FC Forum Apex Power FC Support and Questions.

Power FC No definitive answer on best idle afr for the rotary?

Old May 28, 2009 | 12:04 AM
  #1  
project793's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 241
Likes: 21
From: socal
No definitive answer on best idle afr for the rotary?

Did a search, nobody seems to agree on an optimum idle afr for the fd. With my initial settings my idle at 1000rpm was 11.5:1. I lowered the PIM voltage 1000rpm to about 80% and got my afr to about 13.0:1. Thats the best i could do without the engine running like crap. At 14.0:1 or above the car vibrates/runs like crap, and the ecu stumbles, cannot maintain a stable afr or idle.

I dont get it, how do I get the PFC to get 14.7:1 at idle. Ive tried adjusting just about everything, idle screw, throttle cable, inj map, etc. Any ideas? Anyone here running 14-15 afr at idle?
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 09:01 AM
  #2  
fd_neal's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 352
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
The leanest you can get a smooth idle is the best idle AFR. usually around 13:1
I think your the best you can get it and your wasteing your time trying to get leaner.
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #3  
Aeka GSR's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 33
From: Riverside, CA
I've been able to get a 14:1 but that is with turning off the IAC and messing with the timing. I currently have a 13.5:1 idle with a half bridge at 1100 RPM with the IAC on. This is with 850/1600 injectors and not screwing with the lag time. I'm sure some of the lean comes from the overlap of a bridge.
Reply
Old May 28, 2009 | 11:20 PM
  #4  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
They idle rich from the factory. Then the airpump injects air into the exhaust ports before the O2 sensor. You are asking the motor to do something that it cannot really do.
Reply
Old May 29, 2009 | 12:47 AM
  #5  
Dudemaaanownsanrx7's Avatar
wannaspeed.com
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 5
From: Texas
Yep my idle is right around 13 to 13.5. Rotarys like their fuel. You should tune idle afr to what the engine likes.
Reply
Old May 29, 2009 | 06:01 AM
  #6  
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
Rotary Specialists
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 344
From: Indiana
I have found that most modified cars prefer right around 13.0:1 for idle @ 750-800rpm. Any leaner and the idle becomes erratic and the the vacuum suffers. Cars still running the smog equipment I can get to run far leaner. As others have said tune the car where it is "happiest", don't force it to run too lean or you will have bad idle, poor vacuum and terrible throttle tip in issues.
Reply
Old May 30, 2009 | 12:48 AM
  #7  
project793's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 241
Likes: 21
From: socal
Ok, because the reason I was asking is that my aem afr instructions says long periods of time of richer than 14.0:1 would reduce the sensor life. My car spends a lot of time at idle, lots of traffic, not too much freeway drving
Reply
Old May 30, 2009 | 04:54 AM
  #8  
Banzai-Racing's Avatar
Rotary Specialists
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 344
From: Indiana
Rotaries fry O2 sensors, I always keep 2 spares as backups for my Innovate wideband that I tune with. However that statement from AEM doesn't make sense, sounds like it is their easy way to not cover a warranty issue. You are really only at stoich while cruise, any performance driving is going to be richer than 14

Last edited by Banzai-Racing; May 30, 2009 at 04:59 AM.
Reply
Old May 31, 2009 | 10:14 PM
  #9  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
the AEM wideband is a piece of ****, and the worst part is that you have no idea when it is being inaccurate unless there is an open or short circuit in the harness. I have cross-checked it with known good factory narrowbands on OBD II cars and it won't even read accurately right around stoich. I know a guy who ran the AEM with the sensor unplug (no heater basically) for hundreds of miles and the AEM never threw a code or anything. They use a GM style Bosch sensor and you can run them forever on heavily leaded race gas and they will almost never throw error codes because they have no error checking.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
Mar 28, 2017 03:30 PM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
Apr 23, 2016 06:37 PM
incubuseva
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 3, 2015 12:37 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 AM.