chemicool

iTrader: (1)

Anyone have any MAPs for a FD with Large Street port? Also, looking for Stock FD MAP if anyone has one for comparison.

Another question. I have tried to copy and paste from Excel into Datalogit and when I do it fills all 20x 20 with 1.49 instead of my intended correction values?

arghx

iTrader: (3)

chuck actually has all those maps on his yahoo group

chemicool

iTrader: (1)

What Yahoo group? How do I get to it.?

twisted7

iTrader: (3)

pretty sure you need to buy his notes to be invited.

chemicool

iTrader: (1)

So how do I buy his notes? What is his username here?

arghx

iTrader: (3)

pm cewrx7r1 , you pay for the notes and you get access to the yahoo group which has its own forum and notes

thewird

iTrader: (8)

Your pasting in the wrong place. The correction map is just that, a correction. 1.49 might be the limit of how much you can correct. Your fuel map is actually the Base map and your correction should all be 1's when your copying a map from excel.

thewird

chemicool

iTrader: (1)

So I can only paste into the base map? Not the other MAPS? All I am trying to do is insert some leaner corrections in the INJ map but there a quite a few so I was gonna just paste. I guess I have to do it one at a time?

thewird

iTrader: (8)

No, your not getting it. You can't correct more then 49% which is why it defaults to 1.49

thewird

chemicool

iTrader: (1)

I'm not trying to correct more than 49%. For instance I am trying to change a 1.21 correction to 1.16. However, when I cut and paste these values from Excel into the inj map it defaults to 1.49. However, if I copy from Datalogit into Excel and then back into datalogit without making changes to the info I copied it will accept it as it is written. It is as though Datalogit doesn't recognize the numbers generated by Excel

thewird

iTrader: (8)

You need to select all all cells before pasting.

thewird

chemicool

iTrader: (1)

Aw man I figured it out. I'm a dumbass. I was trying to paste numbers from another website and they were listed without the decimal point. So 121 instead of 1.21. So wird you were correct I was , in effect trying to increase the correction more than 49% like you said. Thanks for helping me sort it out