Srt10 Rx-7
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fallston, MD
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JustinStrife
How much torque do these cars need? They're already a thousand pounds lighter than Vipers.
Originally Posted by photopaintball
phils car makes 683HP/509TQ at 7500rpm. span on the dyno after that
and its built to go 9k rpm which works out to about 720hp
so about 700hp with 500tq is not quite as good as a 700hp v8, but its cheaper, probably more reliable (depending on the v8 build) and its definately cheaper.
and its built to go 9k rpm which works out to about 720hp
so about 700hp with 500tq is not quite as good as a 700hp v8, but its cheaper, probably more reliable (depending on the v8 build) and its definately cheaper.
Originally Posted by jimlab
How's that paper route working out? Got an FC of your own yet?
#27
Meth Head
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rarson
Really? Your car only weighs 2400 lbs? That's DAMN light!
I suppose a ridiculous engine swap thread wouldn't be complete without a bit of bench racing, huh?
LOL!
I suppose a ridiculous engine swap thread wouldn't be complete without a bit of bench racing, huh?
LOL!
#30
Addicted to speed
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kelowna BC
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by photopaintball
If I was going to do a viper engine, I would go solid axle with a 3:1 rear and twin turbo it.
Then you could weelie down half the track
Then you could weelie down half the track
Seriously tho, anyone else notice how alotta people just smoke crack and come post their fucked up ideas on this board? has the original poster even seen a srt-10 motor before? or a viper for that matter? notice how long the hoods are on those cars? jesus christ.
oh well i would rather see a post about a srt-10 swap then a post with pics on an FC with 20's like i have before... lol.
done with the rant.
#32
Super Snuggles
Maybe you should limit your posting to Torque Central. They seem to appreciate day dream projects proposed by people who can't really afford them. And those who "can" afford them... but who end up selling a few months after completion because -- although it was perfect in every way -- they're just ready to move on to something else. *wink *wink*
In fact, now that I think about it, 99% of the people who post in the V8 RX7 forum on Torque Central are just basically full of ****.
In fact, now that I think about it, 99% of the people who post in the V8 RX7 forum on Torque Central are just basically full of ****.
#33
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally Posted by jimlab
In fact, now that I think about it, 99% of the people who post in the V8 RX7 forum on Torque Central are just basically full of ****.
#34
Full Member
Originally Posted by jimlab
Maybe you should limit your posting to Torque Central. They seem to appreciate day dream projects proposed by people who can't really afford them. And those who "can" afford them... but who end up selling a few months after completion because -- although it was perfect in every way -- they're just ready to move on to something else. *wink *wink*
In fact, now that I think about it, 99% of the people who post in the V8 RX7 forum on Torque Central are just basically full of ****.
In fact, now that I think about it, 99% of the people who post in the V8 RX7 forum on Torque Central are just basically full of ****.
lets look at the first page:
srt10
skyline engine
twin turbo v8
4g63
miata motor
ka24det
none of these have been done before and if so very little so everyone here must be dreaming
#35
RX-347
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by photopaintball
phils car makes 683HP/509TQ at 7500rpm. span on the dyno after that
and its built to go 9k rpm which works out to about 720hp
so about 700hp with 500tq is not quite as good as a 700hp v8, but its cheaper, probably more reliable (depending on the v8 build) and its definately cheaper.
plus, what about the weight. a twin turbo set up weighs a lot compared to a built 2.3 with an aluminum head and ss header
if you want people to smile when they see your engine -get a v8
if you want people to cry when they get beat -get a 2.3t
since my car's weight is a major goal, the light engine is important to me.
and its built to go 9k rpm which works out to about 720hp
so about 700hp with 500tq is not quite as good as a 700hp v8, but its cheaper, probably more reliable (depending on the v8 build) and its definately cheaper.
plus, what about the weight. a twin turbo set up weighs a lot compared to a built 2.3 with an aluminum head and ss header
if you want people to smile when they see your engine -get a v8
if you want people to cry when they get beat -get a 2.3t
since my car's weight is a major goal, the light engine is important to me.
And, just to restate your beliefs here, a 304 hp/L 1980's Ford engine is more reliable then a 100 hp/L 21st century GM V8?
Makes sense to me. I've seen the light. Anyone want a few GM LSx engines? I'm trading up to a 2.3L ford.
In regard to the V10, twin turbo V8, skyline engine, V8 engine and your 600 HP for that matter. Come back here in a year and see how many of these projects come to fruition.
I've actually done and driven 5 different chevy V8s in my car, I'm still looking for the right combination; I've done LS1s and SBCs in other FCs. I've seen what can fit, what works, and I know how much it costs to put a setup together, and that's taking into consideration I do all my own fabrication (whenever it's not more time/cost effective to just buy things built, such as proven engine mounts). I know what it takes to make HP, and how much money it takes to get there. Hell, I quit counting at 15K invested in my FC, and it's sitting in my garage waiting on parts at the moment, and I've yet to finish putting my 370 together.
Come back, prove everyone wrong, I'm happy to eat crow, I've done it before, but until them, you can continue to expect the put up or shut up attitude.
Last edited by digitalsolo; 01-22-07 at 08:46 AM.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fallston, MD
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by photopaintball
Why are you here then?
lets look at the first page:
srt10
skyline engine
twin turbo v8
4g63
miata motor
ka24det
none of these have been done before and if so very little so everyone here must be dreaming
lets look at the first page:
srt10
skyline engine
twin turbo v8
4g63
miata motor
ka24det
none of these have been done before and if so very little so everyone here must be dreaming
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fallston, MD
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by digitalsolo
What is the weight of your light engine with all the turbo and I/C plumbing?
#38
Super Snuggles
Originally Posted by photopaintball
so everyone here must be dreaming
Let me know when any of those posters finishes a car with the engine they started asking questions about. Even Capn, who posted questions for two years about using a Cadillac Northstar V8, now has a different engine. Nihilanthic, of course, still has no engine and no car to put it in if he did.
People may want to be different... but then reality usually sets in. There's a reason why people aren't using every engine they can find in the local junkyard just because it's "cheap".
#39
Super Snuggles
Even the twin turbo V8 has been done. It didn't make **** for power because the owner wouldn't listen to anyone's cam recommendations for use with forced induction, but it's been done.
#41
registered user
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Amazing, on the TT V8 FD, where is the radiator and intercooler?
I simply do not believe that its cheaper to make any 4cyl car engine thus manufactured reach the HP and TQ quoted above, vs a V8.
Originally Posted by photopaintball
phils car makes 683HP/509TQ at 7500rpm. span on the dyno after that
and its built to go 9k rpm which works out to about 720hp....
so about 700hp with 500tq is not quite as good as a 700hp v8, but its cheaper, probably more reliable (depending on the v8 build) and its definately cheaper. ...
phils car makes 683HP/509TQ at 7500rpm. span on the dyno after that
and its built to go 9k rpm which works out to about 720hp....
so about 700hp with 500tq is not quite as good as a 700hp v8, but its cheaper, probably more reliable (depending on the v8 build) and its definately cheaper. ...
#42
RX-347
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by slo
I simply do not believe that its cheaper to make any 4cyl car engine thus manufactured reach the HP and TQ quoted above, vs a V8.
#43
Mechanical Engineering
Originally Posted by digitalsolo
You missed a word there; reliably. I can make 600 HP out of a honda, a rotary or a GSX-R 1000 for a fairly low amount of money (relatively speaking). Doing it and having it continue to run for more then 1 or 2 passes is another story.
So that brings me to my next statement, if Ford can make a high output four cylinder only last about 10 hours; my educated guess tells me that someone with "a budget of $5,000" won't come close, and probably fail miserably.
#44
registered user
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It looks like equal parts 1st gen eclipse, second gen Mr2 and early porche 911.
To be fair to ford the RS200 was nearly a dedicated race car, even the production version. Very short life span was a design factor, just like it was for the FD
To be fair to ford the RS200 was nearly a dedicated race car, even the production version. Very short life span was a design factor, just like it was for the FD
Last edited by slo; 01-22-07 at 06:34 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alfred1976
RX-7 Audio/Visual Lounge
3
12-03-15 03:06 AM