Other Engine Conversions - non V-8 Discussion of non-rotary engines, exc V-8's, in a car originally powered by a Rotary Engine.

Interesting swap - turbo Buick V6

Old Apr 1, 2005 | 10:14 AM
  #1  
afterburn27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lets Go Hokies!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 4
From: Greenville, SC
Interesting swap - turbo Buick V6

This is the first buick powered fd I have seen. Turbo 3.8L V6 out of the Grand National??? I am not too familiar with buicks, so someone correct me if I am wrong.


http://www.turbobuicks.com/members/O...d/DSCF1704.JPG

http://www.turbobuicks.com/members/O...d/DSCF1705.JPG

lol @ the hood support

Many more pictures in here:

http://www.turbobuicks.com/members/O..._87GN/cloaked/
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 10:24 AM
  #2  
wingsfan's Avatar
Schadenfreude...Ha Ha
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
That's Misred's car. He had a GN powered FC before that he sold.

http://www.misred.com/

The Buick swap seems like it would be pretty cool, but there's two things that would stop me from considering it.

The first is the absolute requirement to run an auto transmission. I want my manual, no autos for me thank you.

The second being that it's technically illegal, since the engine going into the car is older than the chassis.

I'd guess that 99.99% of the time the monkey inspecting your car to register it wouldn't even notice, but with my luck I'd get the 0.01% stickler that would fail the car.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 10:50 AM
  #3  
IaMtHeRuThLeSs1's Avatar
I'm awesome!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC & Atlanta, GA & Clovis, NM
Old news, his car has been around for quite some time now....head over to torquecentral.com to get more info.

I actually talked to him about his turbo GN FC, He's a super cool guy and was really helpful.

also, since the Turbo 3.8L V6 makes ssoooo much low end torque and horsepower, the first 3 gears of a manuel tranny would be useless. The engine is excellent, I've seen them dyno at 500+hp w/ all bolt ons.

oh btw, this is prob in the wrong section
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 10:53 AM
  #4  
MR_Rick's Avatar
Planning my come back
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Originally Posted by wingsfan
The second being that it's technically illegal, since the engine going into the car is older than the chassis.
if you want it legal and have a 93 model FD you can put a motor form a 92 Typhoon or a Cyclone is pretty much the same motor. since the actual built date of the 93 FD are 92 (at least for early ones) it will be legal.

Last edited by MR_Rick; Apr 1, 2005 at 10:57 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #5  
wingsfan's Avatar
Schadenfreude...Ha Ha
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by IaMtHeRuThLeSs1
also, since the Turbo 3.8L V6 makes ssoooo much low end torque and horsepower, the first 3 gears of a manuel tranny would be useless.
They're not exactly the most usefull things with an LS1 either, but the manual seems to work OK.

I'm guessing they will be pretty useless on a turbocharged LS1 as well. I'll find out soon enough.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 11:06 AM
  #6  
wingsfan's Avatar
Schadenfreude...Ha Ha
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by hondasr4kids
if you want it legal and have a 93 model FD you can put a motor form a 92 Typhoon or a Cyclone is pretty much the same motor. since the actual built date of the 93 FD are 92 (at least for early ones) it will be legal.
Well, I have a 94, so no dice. It's splitting hairs, but there nonetheless. The transmission is a much bigger deal for me.

And I'm not super concerned about being legal, as I don't have any emmissions equipment on the car.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 11:28 AM
  #7  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Swapping in a light all aluminum V8 is one thing. Swapping in an all-iron pig of an engine with the additional heavy forced induction hardware is another. And auto only? No thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #8  
afterburn27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lets Go Hokies!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 4
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by IaMtHeRuThLeSs1
Old news, his car has been around for quite some time now....head over to torquecentral.com to get more info.

Sorry, did a search for "buick swap" and nothing came up
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #9  
SlingShotRX7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
From: DC
as previous owner of a 87 Grand National

the 3.8 ltr sequential fuelinjected turbo motor is the only thing
worth having off that GrandNational Chassis.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 12:53 PM
  #10  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
No Ic Yikes
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #11  
jons3rdgen's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: indiana
The 87's did have an ic.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 05:24 PM
  #12  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Originally Posted by jons3rdgen
The 87's did have an ic.
He was referring to the FD running the G/N drivetrain. Click on the links above.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 11:34 PM
  #13  
hjholter3's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Crossville, Tennessee
The Cyclone and Typhoon Engine was a 4.3 liter turbo, not a 3.8 like the GN's ran.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 01:22 AM
  #14  
gnx7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,090
Likes: 26
From: San Francisco, CA
Rynberg.... believe it or not.. the GN engine with turbo/intercooler etc is lighter than the LS1. Probably helps it is only about 14 inches long and has 2 less cylinders.
GN with everything: 420lbs
LS1 with everything: 481lbs

http://www.turbobuicks.com/forums/sh...&highlight=LS1

Mike is running the hose from the turbo to the TB because he hasn't completed the intercooler piping yet. When his car is done..... it should be pretty bad ***.

I went LS1 also simply because I missed a manual trans... and the T56 gets great economy, can be beat on.... and allows for an insane top end speed. I don't think a GN engine would last long in 20 minute HPDE trashings at the road race course either.

-Mark
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #15  
RX-Heven's Avatar
I'll blow it up real good
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco, CA
If anyone remembers Indy Lights, they used that Buick v6 in all the cars.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 10:46 AM
  #16  
drittens's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 425
Likes: 2
From: Amarillo, Texas
are you some of saying that there is something wrong with the grand national besides it being a automatic
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #17  
mark57's Avatar
Temple of Cornd0g
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 689
Likes: 3
From: Skid Row
I remember Menards running a Buick turbo V6 in the 500 in the early '90s.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #18  
$100T2's Avatar
On the prowl for an FB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 6
From: Surrounded by Sebey parts, Rhode Island
Originally Posted by gnx7
Mike is running the hose from the turbo to the TB because he hasn't completed the intercooler piping yet. When his car is done..... it should be pretty bad ***.

I opened that pic and said to myself, "WTF, is that a dryer vent hose? Looks like something off the back of a Kenmore."
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 12:41 AM
  #19  
weaklink's Avatar
Resident Retard
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Cockaigne
jose zeda, here in louisiana, has had a turbo buick fd he calls a gnx7 for years. it was featured in turbo and high tech performance back in the 90s. go to www.joserotary.com, it's the two tone fd in the pic of the front of his shop.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #20  
johndemoss's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
jose is my uncle, the gnx7 deffinatly has some awesome power to it. swaping with the gn made this car a mean machine
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2005 | 04:42 PM
  #21  
tt2323's Avatar
Import Connoisseur
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 1
From: All over the place
GN motors are insane, seen quite a few <10sec GN's up here in New England. What did the GN weight?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #22  
treynon's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Draper, UT
damn those GN motors... nice!

8 second GNs roam around pamona raceway.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
ChrisRX8PR
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Aug 21, 2015 01:56 PM
Joe428
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
16
Aug 19, 2015 06:24 PM
Machupicchu
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
8
Aug 17, 2015 08:27 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 PM.