Old School and Other Rotary Old School and Other Rotary Powered Vehicles including performance modifications and technical support

How much rpm is too much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #1  
j_tso's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 400
From: Austin, TX
How much rpm is too much?

From the motorsport history part of Mazda's site
In a bid to improve the engine, Mazda started full-scale development of the racing 13B engine with peripheral ports. Mid-development, it was discovered that the rapidly spinning rotors were creating a small gyroscopic effect that adversely affected the handling. The team overcame the problem by redesigning the moving parts to make them as light as possible, changing to a dry sump (a lubrication system that supplies the engine with oil from the oil tank), and mounting the engine closer to the ground.
I've heard of gyroscopic problems in aircraft using radial engines, but never in a car. Would this make a car harder to turn in one direction and faster in the opposite?
The engine in the article was made in 1976, were the rotors much heavier at that time? Since then, we've had engines with more rotors and spinnig faster, and I haven't heard of this problem coming back since.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #2  
Crit's Avatar
No distributor? No thanks
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 6
From: Outskirts of Road Atlanta
It would to a small degree, but not much. The german ME-262 had a hell of a time turning at full throttle and cracked the pylons - first time anyone ever really came across problems like that.

Maybe Mazda was trying to hide some problems somehow, but I don't see gyroscopic effects being an issue at all....
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2007 | 11:02 AM
  #3  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
Heavier rotors back then and also they tended to use heavy flywheels too. 30 pounds just for the flywheel istself.

Those old engines are ok to use at somewhat high RPM if you at least get a light steel flywheel.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 09:11 PM
  #4  
j_tso's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,973
Likes: 400
From: Austin, TX
wow. didn't think the flywheel was that heavy.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #5  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 91
From: Near Seattle
All '71-'80 had 30 pound flywheels. That's quite a run.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dona1326cosprings7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Oct 29, 2015 06:47 AM
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
Oct 7, 2015 08:12 PM
eplusz
General Rotary Tech Support
15
Oct 7, 2015 04:04 PM
Einheri
Single Turbo RX-7's
14
Oct 7, 2015 12:23 PM
musker
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Oct 1, 2015 05:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 PM.