New Member RX-7 Technical Post your first technical questions here, in an easy flame free environment, before jumping into the main technical sections.

Vacuum: Replace v. Remove

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #1  
1NSIGHT's Avatar
Thread Starter
I Used to Park Cars
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
From: Norcross
Vacuum: Replace v. Remove

I have a lil extra money to spend on my 86 NA S4.

Should I replace the hoses or get rid of the ones I can. Why or Why NOT?
The car is daily driven and stock w/ the exception of premium wires and plugs.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2009 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
Are the vac lines old and in need of replacing? If so, then go ahead. It shouldn't cost you more than ~$30 to buy enough hose to redo the engine bay.

There's no performance gain from removing emissions equipment and the hoses associated with them, so the only reason to get rid if them is to clean up the engine bay. If that's your goal, then do some searches for "emissions removal" to find out how to do it properly. Obviously, if your area does smog checks, you'll need to keep them.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #3  
adeenoki's Avatar
Exempt_revisioN
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa
don't know much about those cars but if you have a nest of lines like the 3rd gen, it would just bug me not to take it out and minimize the lines.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Aug 31, 2015 07:49 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.