New Member RX-7 Technical Post your first technical questions here, in an easy flame free environment, before jumping into the main technical sections.

94 RX-7 wont start while hot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 01:31 PM
  #1  
jdodds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove, UT
94 RX-7 wont start while hot

I generally start off with a mod list before I describe my problem to give people a better idea of what Im dealing with exactly so here it goes.

94 chassis
street port motor
all plugs are 9s
magnecore wires
hks ignition
hks fmic
gt4088 journal bearing turbo
greddy manifold
catless 3" trust exhaust
fluidyne radiator
2 spal fans
550cc primary injectors
1680 "blue top" secondaries on a KG PARTS rail
Walbro 255 fuel pump
Aeromotive FPR set to a base pressure of 42psi
P/S, air pump, and A/C deleted
Apex'i Power FC with a base map made in datalogit from another local owner.


This is a problem thats developed recently. Once the car gets warmed up, it wont start above 70*C. It was starting up just fine when at normal temperature about a month ago and has been driven daily all summer. The car DID NOT overheat and isnt losing coolant so that almost rules out coolant seals. I just spent a day tearing apart the upper intake manifold, throttle body, fuel rails, and replaced all the vac lines with the job.

The intake air temperature sensor tested with a resistance within factory spec
throttle position sensor is adjusted right where it should be
The throttle body is free of leaks and adjusted properly

Does anyone have any ideas on what could be the cause of this? Everything looks fine in the sensor/switch check menu on the PFC and it runs great while at normal operating temp. Once you shut it off, it doesnt want to start back up until it cools off. It will fire every so often but wont get enough combustion to start up. Ive tried holding the gas pedal all the way down to try to de-flood it because I thought that was maybe the cause of the no start. Didnt help at all.

Under the water temp correction menu, I havent changed anything from the day it was set up. cranking time is 10.3ms at +80 if anyone is wondering.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 05:35 PM
  #2  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
You can try reducing the amount of fuel injected under warm conditions. On my FC, I only use an injector pulse-width of 8ms for warm to hot temperatures, and I could probably reduce it further. I would also do a flood-clearing procedure by disabling fuel injection (typically by pulling a fuse) before cranking the engine over.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 06:35 PM
  #3  
jdodds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove, UT
Fuel injection disables under wide open throttle while cranking.

I tried messing with the pulse width a little more today. Going from 10.3 to 12.4ms seemed to help a little bit. Ive decided that we really need to get a wideband in it also. I took it down the road and saw some very disturbing counts of knock.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 07:12 PM
  #4  
Bakemono7's Avatar
Full Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach
Hate to ask, but what's your compression at? I had this same problem, and after checking my compression, i had around 70psi.....it ended up being my good ol' trusty apex seals and now i'm in the middle of a rebuild. You can also check your injectors. A leaky injector will also sometimes be the problem as well.

Last edited by Bakemono7; Sep 27, 2010 at 07:16 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 07:22 PM
  #5  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,766
Likes: 794
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by jdodds

street port motor
gt4088 journal bearing turbo

greddy manifold
catless 3" trust exhaust

550cc primary injectors
1680 "blue top" secondaries on a KG PARTS rail
Walbro 255 fuel pump
Aeromotive FPR set to a base pressure of 42psi

Apex'i Power FC with a base map made in datalogit from another local owner.

You want to be tuned to your mods especially when you have a ported motor and big single turbo. The base map in the PFC won't cut it.

Time for a compression test.

Also double check your Oil Metering Pump sensor in the PFC sensor check.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 04:46 AM
  #6  
jdodds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove, UT
I finally got time to run a compression test on it. Were getting about 73psi on each face for both rotors. Its my understanding that those readings are pretty good for a street port.

One thing that I did remember about this whole situation was kind of interesting. While my DSM was torn apart a while back, I loaned the owner my battery. He drove around on it for a couple months and everything was fine. It seemed like once I got my car finished, he was the one having problems. We just kinda wrote it off as one of those "if its not one car, its the other" things.

While doing the compression test, the motor wasnt spinning up too quickly at all. I grabbed my car and gave him a little boost to do the test. Turns out, his battery is a little riding lawnmower sized thing. He never said much about having to wait for his battery to recover during his starting issues. Makes sense now. As soon as he gets up, were going over to the parts store and sticking a brand new optima red top in there.

For anyone thats wondering why my compression numbers are so low, I currently reside at 4700+ ft. He talked to another FD owner in a near by city(a bit lower elevation) and he was getting similar results. Now Im curious as to what my brother gets on a compression test at his elevation. He sits around 6700 ft. so I would imagine his is similar to the results I came up with because hes on a stock port.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 04:48 AM
  #7  
jdodds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove, UT
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
You want to be tuned to your mods especially when you have a ported motor and big single turbo. The base map in the PFC won't cut it.
The base map that was uploaded came from another local with a very similar setup. The only thing that was different was he has a slightly smaller turbo. Other than that, the setups match and have only changed a tiny bit in the timing tables for the final tune. It was all uploaded via datalogit.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 09:42 AM
  #8  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,766
Likes: 794
From: Bay Area CA
I'm not an expert on compression tests but 73 PSI on each rotor face seems like an odd reading. Hopefully someone else will comment on that.

Did you hold down the shrader valve while doing the compression test?

Their is a how-to in the FAQ threads.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 10:50 AM
  #9  
Mahjik's Avatar
Mr. Links
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 27,595
Likes: 43
From: Kansas City, MO
I'm not sure what access you have in newbie land, but here are some threads on the subject:

https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/hot-starting-issues-what-check-924171/
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/hard-start-long-start-discussion-modified-setups-897249/

Something from one of those threads:

Originally Posted by EvilAreXeven
To everyone who contributed to this thread, THANK YOU!

Arghx, you are the man. My hot starting problem has been reduced to a bearable standard. Car will start up every time now! Not perfectly, but I can't ask for too much considering most of my air/idling components are eliminated.

I played around with the ignition timing in P9/10 N1/2. Went through 15/10/20 degrees advance like you said. She liked 20 degrees advance the most.

Played with the water temp/fuel cranking injection time as well. The car liked an extra 15% @ 30C and below, and an extra 10% to 80C and 50C. Car starts in a few seconds now as opposed to 10+ seconds and keeping the started engaged till it's actually running.

Once again, thank you for taking the time to point me in the right direction
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 11:35 AM
  #10  
Sideo's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 763
Likes: 15
From: reno nevada
73 psi sounds blown to me ideal is 120 and below 90 is rebuild I don't think elevation makes that much of a difference
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2010 | 01:42 PM
  #11  
jdodds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Pleasant Grove, UT
Now that we have the new battery in, Im sure the results of the compression test were affected by a lower cranking speed even with another car hooked up to give the battery a little boost.

Sideo, there is an altitude correction that you can look at in the factory service manual. Take a look at something describing altitude vs. density. Its definitely enough to make a note of.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The1Sun
New Member RX-7 Technical
9
Mar 18, 2018 11:08 PM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
Apr 23, 2016 06:37 PM
gtcd
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
30
Aug 19, 2015 02:44 AM
befarrer
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
Aug 14, 2015 04:18 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.