Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

wich engine should i use

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2014 | 07:41 PM
  #26  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,868
Likes: 573
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
My steel 2mm seal engine has 60k kms on it. I run it up to 10k on occasion although I try to keep revs below 9k for transmission life. Compression is degrading slowly but that is mainly due to the chrome coming off of the '84-85 rotor housings.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2014 | 09:08 PM
  #27  
Kenku's Avatar
spoon!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 50
From: Dousman, WI
I remember someone milling S5 rotors to 3mm to use 3mm carbons, on the theory that they would have more lifespan than 2mm ones. Can't remember who though, or if it made sense.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2014 | 01:21 AM
  #28  
sa22rally's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
Originally Posted by bumpstart
yes 9.7 is good , better than the early 9.2 heavy 13b rotors that have less gear fixing pins

they weigh close to s3 12a rx7 rotor specs, so will spin like tops in comparison, and make better TQ down low
( despite 4 large ports being exactly what you dont need to make good low down TQ )

carbon apex seals just suck/// the housings are designed to take steal, and mazda went there with good reasons
carbon doesnt last long , and it may seal great now,, but dont expect 50 000 km

if you where building the ultimate NA rotor motor then you would be getting the housings lapped and purchasing the ultra lightweight ceramic seals

which give you the mass advantage of carbon
with the hardness advantage of steel
Thank you and no clearence issues?. The car is doing 800 miles a year tops.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2014 | 01:35 AM
  #29  
bumpstart's Avatar
talking head
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 15
From: Perth, WA, OZ
no clash issue

( looks like i will have to drag out pics of THAT housing again showing the effect of the carb 13b rotors rattling off the inside of 13bt housings )
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2014 | 11:19 AM
  #30  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by peejay
My steel 2mm seal engine has 60k kms on it. I run it up to 10k on occasion although I try to keep revs below 9k for transmission life. Compression is degrading slowly but that is mainly due to the chrome coming off of the '84-85 rotor housings.
we ran a set of junkyard 2mm seals to 9400rpm for a couple of seasons, and they did ok. they probably wouldn't pass measurement to be reused at this point, can't complain about that though.

housings actually look great.

we ran 2 cars, a completely stock 87 GXL, and the race car which was an S5 engine with haltech + premix, and the factory car always had nice plug color, and the haltech car didn't, it was always black. i used to blame the haltech, but i think its the premix
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2014 | 07:00 AM
  #31  
23Racer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,199
Likes: 9
From: Oakville, Ontario
I have been using factory steel apex seals in my motor for 7 race years on pre-mix. S5 9.7 rotor assembly in an S4 TII set of housings. I buzz it to 9200 rpm on occasion and most of the time to 9000 rpm. The compression and everything are still good and it made enough power to win a 3 Hour enduro this year and win the ST2 Class Championship. I am sorta scared to pull the motor apart as it is running so well now and super reliable.

My buddy went to the carbon seals and he had to rebuild the motor every 2 years. Granted he was buzzing to 10,500 - 11,000.

Eric
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2014 | 02:19 PM
  #32  
fidelity101's Avatar
Rallye RX7
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 110
From: MI/CHI
Just tore down my engine and I've had various bouts of 8.5k to 10krpm with steel apex seals: take a look...

https://www.rx7club.com/build-thread...-925525/page5/

yes it still started and ran and drove.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2014 | 01:43 PM
  #33  
sa22rally's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
great advices from everybody thank you.
Is it realistic to just take a good 4 port engine rebuild and clean it up, put in a bridgeport and put it back together with used parts and still get a reliable engine? off course i will tjek all measurements and specs..
And can i expect 200 something HP frome that simple a build?
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2014 | 10:43 AM
  #34  
SpikeDerailed's Avatar
This sh*t burns oil!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 5
From: Charlotte, NC - USA
Originally Posted by bumpstart
no clash issue

( looks like i will have to drag out pics of THAT housing again showing the effect of the carb 13b rotors rattling off the inside of 13bt housings )
I would love to see that if you have the time.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2014 | 01:46 PM
  #35  
fidelity101's Avatar
Rallye RX7
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 110
From: MI/CHI
Originally Posted by sa22rally
great advices from everybody thank you.
Is it realistic to just take a good 4 port engine rebuild and clean it up, put in a bridgeport and put it back together with used parts and still get a reliable engine? off course i will tjek all measurements and specs..
And can i expect 200 something HP frome that simple a build?
Simple? Yes. Cheap? Probably not.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
Apr 23, 2016 06:37 PM
eddierotary
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
Aug 16, 2015 04:12 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.