Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum Discussion of naturally-aspirated rotary performance. No Power Adders, only pure rotary power! From the "12A" to the "RENESIS" and beyond.

High comp Rew semi p NA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 07:01 PM
  #26  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by trots*88tii-ae*
3mm carbons would be better for high rpm than 2mm steels. The reason i say 3 mm for carbon seals strictly, is that they will wear less quickly than 2mm carbons. The only reason to go with carbon seals is they are cheap, will work in n/a's, and are light enough and soft enough for high rpm use. Ceramics are better in basically every aspect though, except that if they break they wreak carnage on engines. Steel seals will be more durable than carbon,, but don't tolerate as high rpms as the other two without causing wear on the housings. When it comes to picking seals, you can't have everything
+1.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 07:51 PM
  #27  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,856
Likes: 568
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
I wind the wee out of my engines on 2mm Atkins seals and they last a good long while. At least, the apex seals aren't the engine's main wear item, and the rotor housings always look okay. Revs are limited more by the rotating assembly than anything else. I clearanced everything but I still am leery about holding it up by 10k, you know? 9500 is just fine though.

3mm carbon-aluminum may be better than 2mm iron but good enough is good enough sometimes. I wonder which seal would show lower friction. Supposedly ceramics are worth a good amount of power just in reduced friction.

One nice thing about the carbons is that they're one piece. With two piece seals, you either have to worry about a small corner piece falling into a bridge eyebrow, or if you have the aftermarket style long corner piece, then you have to worry about a huge exhaust (or intake ) port leaving the long piece poorly supported.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 09:19 PM
  #28  
HIDrift's Avatar
Thread Starter
KARNAP!
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: 93311
So now there's two guys here saying 3mm "might" b better than 2mm on a high rpm na? is there someone here that tried a 3mm carbon for high rpm na? Before I get my renesis rotors cut I want to make sure it's gonna work can't really afford mistakes.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2012 | 09:26 PM
  #29  
HIDrift's Avatar
Thread Starter
KARNAP!
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: 93311
Originally Posted by peejay
I wind the wee out of my engines on 2mm Atkins seals and they last a good long while. At least, the apex seals aren't the engine's main wear item, and the rotor housings always look okay. Revs are limited more by the rotating assembly than anything else. I clearanced everything but I still am leery about holding it up by 10k, you know? 9500 is just fine though.

3mm carbon-aluminum may be better than 2mm iron but good enough is good enough sometimes. I wonder which seal would show lower friction. Supposedly ceramics are worth a good amount of power just in reduced friction.

One nice thing about the carbons is that they're one piece. With two piece seals, you either have to worry about a small corner piece falling into a bridge eyebrow, or if you have the aftermarket style long corner piece, then you have to worry about a huge exhaust (or intake ) port leaving the long piece poorly supported.
Wasup bro, was ur engine lightened n balanced? Do u have any pics of d wear on ur rotor housings from revving at 9500?
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2012 | 03:55 PM
  #30  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by HIDrift
So now there's two guys here saying 3mm "might" b better than 2mm on a high rpm na? is there someone here that tried a 3mm carbon for high rpm na? Before I get my renesis rotors cut I want to make sure it's gonna work can't really afford mistakes.
every competition engine from the mid 1970's to the 13J-M had 3mm carbons in them, they are pretty proven. a 2mm seal should seal slightly better, but wear slightly faster.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2012 | 09:27 PM
  #31  
Sgt.Stinkfist's Avatar
premix, for f's sake
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 5
From: madison, WI
The carbons are ideal for revving the **** out the engine, and are relatively cost effective. The 3mm vs. 2mm is only really gonna affect the life expectancy. If you're goin carbon, go 3mm all day long
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ian_D
Single Turbo RX-7's
25
Oct 14, 2015 12:31 PM
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Sep 6, 2015 10:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 PM.