Haltech Forum Area is for discussing Haltechs

Haltech a fast reacting closed element air temp sensor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #1  
slo's Avatar
slo
Thread Starter
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
a fast reacting closed element air temp sensor

Who can tell me where to get a fast reacting closed element air temp sensor.

I would preferably want something that reacts as fast as the GM/haltech sensor.

I have read online that the GM/haltech water temp sensor which is used as an air temp sensor in some vehicles doesn't react fast enough for forced induction use.

I am spraying methanol 7-10 inches infront of the sensor and though it continues to work, I am concerned about it longevity.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #2  
Claudio RX-7's Avatar
EFI Tech Wannabe
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 10
From: D.R., USA, the world...
I dont know the specs on this sensor, but this looks a lot like the small thread coolant sensor that haltech uses.

Part number 0 280 130 039

Here's a pic of it.
Attached Thumbnails a fast reacting closed element air temp sensor-airtemp_bosch.jpg   a fast reacting closed element air temp sensor-airtemp_bosch2.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #3  
MikeV's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Seriously, I think "fast reacting" and "closed element" physically just don't go together. If you're worried about it, pull it every n months and inspect it.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #4  
fritts's Avatar
Mad Man
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 4
From: Indiana
With ^ or move the sensor in front of the spray nozzle. Summit has 3/8 NPT weld on bungs that could be welded to the IC piping.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
slo's Avatar
slo
Thread Starter
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
having the sensor behind the spray is part of the system.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 02:13 PM
  #6  
MikeV's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Yeah, you're kind of between a rock and a hard place. If the sensor is before the spray, your temperatures reading will have no relationship to reality under spray.
You really need a shielded open element, so it's not insulated but doesn't get direct spray. I've thought about doing this, with either epoxy (plastic cage sensors) or brazing (brass-cage), but who wants to screw with things in the intake path?

Last edited by MikeV; Feb 18, 2008 at 02:40 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 03:25 AM
  #7  
slo's Avatar
slo
Thread Starter
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Here is the spec sheat for this sensor, including calibrations:

http://www.bosch-motorsport.de/pdf/s.../NTC_M12-L.pdf

I believe it would mount in any of the stock locations. Probably a good choice if running a big FMIC (very stable intake temps).

But if I'm reading this right the sensors reaction time is listed as <10 seconds. Thats not gonna cut it as the haltech/gm open element sensor react within less than 1 second.


Originally Posted by Claudio RX-7
I dont know the specs on this sensor, but this looks a lot like the small thread coolant sensor that haltech uses.

Part number 0 280 130 039

Here's a pic of it.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 02:32 PM
  #8  
Claudio RX-7's Avatar
EFI Tech Wannabe
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 10
From: D.R., USA, the world...
Originally Posted by MikeV
Seriously, I think "fast reacting" and "closed element" physically just don't go together. If you're worried about it, pull it every n months and inspect it.
So then you're saying is that this "closed element" sensor isnt better than the standard Haltech air temp sensor because it has the resistor exposed?

Im for using that bosch sensor just for the metric thread and since it apparently has a very similar scaling as the haltech one.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #9  
calculon's Avatar
On flats
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
While I don't disagree that less than one second is more desirable that less than 10 seconds, is one second even fast enough? I'm not trying to sound like an ***, I'm actually asking. It seems like a LOT changes in the top of the power band (the most hectic part) in a single second. Anyone got any experience tuning AI in this fashion?
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #10  
MikeV's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Actually, that's the slimmest closed-element screw-in sensor I've seen... that little bit of plastic enclosure probably provides negligible insulation value. It should certainly fare better than the coolant-temp sensors that have a good 1/4-inch of plastic and brass surrounding the thermistor on all sides.

... for a spray (meth/H2O) application, that sensor could be better than an open-element in some ways -- I always worry that the open element sensor reads artificially low due to surface-evaporation effects. But I'm probably nit-picking.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 03:13 PM
  #11  
MikeV's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Originally Posted by calculon
While I don't disagree that less than one second is more desirable that less than 10 seconds, is one second even fast enough?
Without more details on their Response Time measurement, it's hard to tell if 10 seconds or 1 second make sense.
For an automotive environment, you can't really get much faster than a tiny open-element thermistor. I would think you get a great deal of accuracy within milliseconds - if not microseconds - for reasonable changes in temperature. But to get the specified (high) accuracy across the entire measurement range may take seconds.

Reaction time is largely a function of the mass of the sensor element, modified by how insulated it is. Tiny element/no insulation = fastest reaction time. Larger element/insulated = slow time.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #12  
slo's Avatar
slo
Thread Starter
registered user
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Put the meth or water injector as far ahead of the IAT as possible and this will be less of a problem.

Originally Posted by MikeV
Actually, that's the slimmest closed-element screw-in sensor I've seen... that little bit of plastic enclosure probably provides negligible insulation value. It should certainly fare better than the coolant-temp sensors that have a good 1/4-inch of plastic and brass surrounding the thermistor on all sides.

... for a spray (meth/H2O) application, that sensor could be better than an open-element in some ways -- I always worry that the open element sensor reads artificially low due to surface-evaporation effects. But I'm probably nit-picking.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
Apr 23, 2016 06:37 PM
befarrer
Microtech
3
Aug 22, 2015 05:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:38 AM.