Haltech Forum Area is for discussing Haltechs

Haltech another e6x ignition problem...

Old Oct 3, 2004 | 12:41 PM
  #51  
DigitalSynthesis's Avatar
Always something...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Ga USA
Okay. The stock flywheel HAS a counterweight built into it. This is critical to vibration reduction. If you go aftermarket on the flywheel, then you MUST use an automatic tranny counterweight which is designed to go with the rotors you use. Search on this, you'll find a lot of info. Rotors and counterweights go together. The front counterweight is just a small one, its not sufficient to balance against the rotors. I think perhaps the front counterweight balances the e-shaft but I'm not 100% sure on this. I do know for a fact that the rear counterweight balances the rotors and is therefore critical that it be matched to the set of rotors you are running, such that with the weight but w/o the flywheel, the engine is perfectly balanced. Then, once you add the balanced aftermarket flywheel, you still have a perfectly balanced engine. Got it?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #52  
zjbarra's Avatar
Rotodeus
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: Gresham, OR
That makes sense. I can't use the automatic counterbalance though since it's not going to be matched for turbo 2 rotors though am I right? So I need to buy a counterweight from racing beat or someone along those lines?

I was thinking from the begining that the rotors were out of phase at the correct angle to not require any counter weight but I guess this would be in the ideal rotary engine where the rotors would only spin and not move beyond that? We're gong to go with a s5 counter weight for now and see what I can do about getting a s4 one. Thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 01:10 PM
  #53  
GUITARJUNKIE28's Avatar
Thread Starter
multipersonality disorder
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
From: so. cal
using an s5 counterweight with s4 rotors will blow it up!!!
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 01:31 PM
  #54  
DigitalSynthesis's Avatar
Always something...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Ga USA
Yep. You MUST match the counterweight with the rotors, as I said. MUST. MUST. MUST. And I have an auto counterweight from an S4 TII on mine. So I know they exist. :-P
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 05:45 PM
  #55  
zjbarra's Avatar
Rotodeus
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: Gresham, OR
Oh I know I must have it, I'm just trying to figure out what I need to get. An auto counterweight as in for an automatic turbo 2? Did they make them in japan or something?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 06:50 PM
  #56  
DigitalSynthesis's Avatar
Always something...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Ga USA
Yes, an auto counterweight as in from whatever model your rotors came out of. If you have S4 TII rotors, then you need an auto from the S4 TII. If you have S5 TII rotors ... you got it.

Mine came with my engine when I imported it from Japan. I thought they made automatic TIIs in the US as well, though.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #57  
zjbarra's Avatar
Rotodeus
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: Gresham, OR
I'm almost 100% sure they didn't actually. That is why I asked a couple times to make sure. I looked at a webpage that said the weight of the rotors out of the NA is the same as that of the turbo for both s4 and s5's I'd assume that the mass of the rotor is balanced so would I be able to use ANY s4 counterweight?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2004 | 07:52 PM
  #58  
DigitalSynthesis's Avatar
Always something...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Ga USA
I could be wrong but I believe that the CR being different requires you to use a different counterweight as the weight of the rotors might be equal but the center of gravity for each might not be. I cannot state whether it would work or not, but something in me suspects you would run into problems.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 02:38 AM
  #59  
zjbarra's Avatar
Rotodeus
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: Gresham, OR
I would figure the rotors to be balanced thus making the center of mass right smack in the center. Beyond that, if the essentric shaft did not change weight, it would make sense that be universal from NA to turbo. Just an idea, not something I want to roll the dice on though.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 09:30 AM
  #60  
DigitalSynthesis's Avatar
Always something...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Ga USA
You are right about the center of mass, I think I meant polar moment, which affects rotational inertia. But my main point was the same as yours: its not something to gamble on.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 12:29 PM
  #61  
GUITARJUNKIE28's Avatar
Thread Starter
multipersonality disorder
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
From: so. cal
i have always wondered if the n/a and turbo rear counterweights were the same.
for my personal preference, i don't like really lightweight flywheels--the 3rd gen stock flywheel is just fine for me.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 02:19 PM
  #62  
zjbarra's Avatar
Rotodeus
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: Gresham, OR
I'm sure too light can be a pain. The steel I put in is something like 18 with counterweight so it shaves a bit.

Some has to have tried this out. I think the only problem would be that without a machine to balance it with, you're going to be shooting blindy because even if the polar moment was really close, it would probably be hard on the engine as well. I do think that the polar moment about the center axis of the essentric shaft is going to only be effected by the location of the center of mass of the rotor which would be a single point location dead center of the rotor. It's instantanious "lever arm" is going to be the same distance regardless of the rotor used and the center of mass should never be changing unless my physics is more wishful than accurate :-P
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #63  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
i have always wondered if the n/a and turbo rear counterweights were the same.
Counterweights are dependent on rotor weights.
Since the turbo versus non-turbo rotor weights were identical for matching years...yes, the counterweights are identical.



-Ted
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:33 PM
  #64  
DigitalSynthesis's Avatar
Always something...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Ga USA
Well then. There it is. Go for your NA auto tranny counterweight from that year.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 11:13 PM
  #65  
GUITARJUNKIE28's Avatar
Thread Starter
multipersonality disorder
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
From: so. cal
ted's the man
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WANKfactor
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
Sep 29, 2015 01:14 PM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
Sep 28, 2015 04:34 PM
subeone
General Rotary Tech Support
0
Sep 24, 2015 09:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 AM.