Haltech another e6x ignition problem...
#51
Always something...
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, Ga USA
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay. The stock flywheel HAS a counterweight built into it. This is critical to vibration reduction. If you go aftermarket on the flywheel, then you MUST use an automatic tranny counterweight which is designed to go with the rotors you use. Search on this, you'll find a lot of info. Rotors and counterweights go together. The front counterweight is just a small one, its not sufficient to balance against the rotors. I think perhaps the front counterweight balances the e-shaft but I'm not 100% sure on this. I do know for a fact that the rear counterweight balances the rotors and is therefore critical that it be matched to the set of rotors you are running, such that with the weight but w/o the flywheel, the engine is perfectly balanced. Then, once you add the balanced aftermarket flywheel, you still have a perfectly balanced engine. Got it?
#52
Rotodeus
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gresham, OR
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That makes sense. I can't use the automatic counterbalance though since it's not going to be matched for turbo 2 rotors though am I right? So I need to buy a counterweight from racing beat or someone along those lines?
I was thinking from the begining that the rotors were out of phase at the correct angle to not require any counter weight but I guess this would be in the ideal rotary engine where the rotors would only spin and not move beyond that? We're gong to go with a s5 counter weight for now and see what I can do about getting a s4 one. Thanks for the info.
I was thinking from the begining that the rotors were out of phase at the correct angle to not require any counter weight but I guess this would be in the ideal rotary engine where the rotors would only spin and not move beyond that? We're gong to go with a s5 counter weight for now and see what I can do about getting a s4 one. Thanks for the info.
#54
Always something...
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, Ga USA
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep. You MUST match the counterweight with the rotors, as I said. MUST. MUST. MUST. And I have an auto counterweight from an S4 TII on mine. So I know they exist. :-P
#56
Always something...
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, Ga USA
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, an auto counterweight as in from whatever model your rotors came out of. If you have S4 TII rotors, then you need an auto from the S4 TII. If you have S5 TII rotors ... you got it.
Mine came with my engine when I imported it from Japan. I thought they made automatic TIIs in the US as well, though.
Mine came with my engine when I imported it from Japan. I thought they made automatic TIIs in the US as well, though.
#57
Rotodeus
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gresham, OR
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm almost 100% sure they didn't actually. That is why I asked a couple times to make sure. I looked at a webpage that said the weight of the rotors out of the NA is the same as that of the turbo for both s4 and s5's I'd assume that the mass of the rotor is balanced so would I be able to use ANY s4 counterweight?
#58
Always something...
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, Ga USA
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I could be wrong but I believe that the CR being different requires you to use a different counterweight as the weight of the rotors might be equal but the center of gravity for each might not be. I cannot state whether it would work or not, but something in me suspects you would run into problems.
#59
Rotodeus
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gresham, OR
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would figure the rotors to be balanced thus making the center of mass right smack in the center. Beyond that, if the essentric shaft did not change weight, it would make sense that be universal from NA to turbo. Just an idea, not something I want to roll the dice on though.
#60
Always something...
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta, Ga USA
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You are right about the center of mass, I think I meant polar moment, which affects rotational inertia. But my main point was the same as yours: its not something to gamble on.
#61
multipersonality disorder
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: so. cal
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have always wondered if the n/a and turbo rear counterweights were the same.
for my personal preference, i don't like really lightweight flywheels--the 3rd gen stock flywheel is just fine for me.
for my personal preference, i don't like really lightweight flywheels--the 3rd gen stock flywheel is just fine for me.
#62
Rotodeus
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gresham, OR
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure too light can be a pain. The steel I put in is something like 18 with counterweight so it shaves a bit.
Some has to have tried this out. I think the only problem would be that without a machine to balance it with, you're going to be shooting blindy because even if the polar moment was really close, it would probably be hard on the engine as well. I do think that the polar moment about the center axis of the essentric shaft is going to only be effected by the location of the center of mass of the rotor which would be a single point location dead center of the rotor. It's instantanious "lever arm" is going to be the same distance regardless of the rotor used and the center of mass should never be changing unless my physics is more wishful than accurate :-P
Some has to have tried this out. I think the only problem would be that without a machine to balance it with, you're going to be shooting blindy because even if the polar moment was really close, it would probably be hard on the engine as well. I do think that the polar moment about the center axis of the essentric shaft is going to only be effected by the location of the center of mass of the rotor which would be a single point location dead center of the rotor. It's instantanious "lever arm" is going to be the same distance regardless of the rotor used and the center of mass should never be changing unless my physics is more wishful than accurate :-P
#63
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by GUITARJUNKIE28
i have always wondered if the n/a and turbo rear counterweights were the same.
Since the turbo versus non-turbo rotor weights were identical for matching years...yes, the counterweights are identical.
-Ted
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post