General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

we all read the 3mm vs 2mm apex seal debates...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2018 | 10:36 AM
  #1  
Richard Miller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Damn, it did start!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 470
From: washington
we all read the 3mm vs 2mm apex seal debates...

One thing that I can't find is the sealing loss and frictional differences. I understand they exist, but how "bad"? I am working on a GSL-SE engine and while FC rotors would be nice, the funds spent on buying $400 used rotors could be spent elsewhere. It's not like 3mm apex seals were failing at 60k. There are plenty of high mileage 12A's. So what I am looking for is a rule of thumb number that for example a 3mm apex seal would be down on horsepower by 5% compared to a 2mm seal. Does such data exist?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2018 | 03:49 PM
  #2  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by Richard Miller
One thing that I can't find is the sealing loss and frictional differences. I understand they exist, but how "bad"?
If this is some sort of data collecting thing for you, then fine. Otherwise, I wouldn't worry about it. My guess is the power gains you might see due to putting S4 rotors in a S3 engine would be attributed mostly to the weight you shed as opposed to the apex seals.

So what I am looking for is a rule of thumb number that for example a 3mm apex seal would be down on horsepower by 5% compared to a 2mm seal. Does such data exist?
Unless some private party conducted their own, valid, apples-to-apples experiments, I would tend to think such data probably doesn't exist. It would be pointless for Mazda to publish anything because from 1974 to 2012 there were major changes to the 13B engines that would keep you from isolating any changes, IF ANY, solely due to apex seal size.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2018 | 05:13 PM
  #3  
Richard Miller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Damn, it did start!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 470
From: washington
I would have expected a Mazda document that gave hard numbers from development. This was less data collection and diminutive returns estimation.

Thank you.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2018 | 05:51 PM
  #4  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by Richard Miller
I would have expected a Mazda document that gave hard numbers from development.
They probably do have printed hard data. Whether or not it is available for our consumption, I don't know. If you search hard enough, or know the right people, you could probably eventually get to it. I have a few members in mind that you could ask if it comes to it, so there's that. It may lead you to something. It may not.

However if they exist, I would think, though, that it would be more technical stuff (friction and wear numbers, material comparisons, and that sort of thing) - as opposed to comparisons involving power production. I would offer to look it up in the old Rotary Engine book (I think I have a PDF copy somewhere), but I really don't remember if the S4 13Bs even existed when it was published, so that would probably be a dead end.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2018 | 07:13 PM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Richard Miller
I would have expected a Mazda document that gave hard numbers from development. This was less data collection and diminutive returns estimation.

Thank you.
there was an SAE paper, i'll have to dig up the computer to look

Reply
Old Dec 19, 2018 | 08:51 PM
  #6  
Richard Miller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Damn, it did start!
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 470
From: washington
Dusting this off a bit. Reliability gets cited for 2mm apex seals. This confuses me slightly as I thing the 12a is the most reliable engine out of the whole group. What are the reliability concerns with a 3mm apex seal? Greater risk of chatter marks?
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2018 | 06:58 AM
  #7  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,870
Likes: 574
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
3mm seals destroy the chrome, especially in 12As. They also are more likely to hammer the slots in the rotors out, making the rotors unusable. (These two problems feed themselves - bad chrome makes the seals chatter, chattering seals hurts the chrome...) A lot of times this would lead to broken seals as well, the chattering stresses them. I've pulled apart running engines with broken seals!

12As may have been super-reliable but when they were worn out, rebuilding usually meant replacing everything inside since the rotors would be egged out and the chrome on the rotor housings would be scrap. 2mm seal engines simply don't do that nearly to the level that the 3mm seal engines did. A 180k mile 2mm seal engine looks better than a 100k mile 3mm seal engine inside. Usually it cracked a coolant land out before it actually wore out.

The REAL problem is that these wear items are all NLA. You can't buy 12A rotors or rotor housings anymore.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2018 | 04:15 PM
  #8  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Richard Miller
. This confuses me slightly as I thing the 12a is the most reliable engine out of the whole group.
i haven't had any special luck with 12A cars, out of the 7 ive owned, ive had to put engines in 5 of them. considering a 6th, its fine right now, but its 33 years old, so its (over) due to start leaking from the dowel pins

Reply
Old Dec 29, 2018 | 01:23 AM
  #9  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,998
Likes: 349
From: FL
12As are great engines, but they are most definitely NOT as flawless as their reputation suggests. Of all the ones I've disassembled over the years, I'm not sure if I've ever seen one with pristine housings, but if I did, then it certainly was an outlier. Missing chrome and apex seals that were cracked or chipped were fairly common. Much different with the '86+ 13Bs I've pulled apart. Missing chrome was relatively uncommon with them.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2018 | 09:22 AM
  #10  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,837
Likes: 3,234
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
when i started at Mazda we actually stocked a pair of 12A rotor housings, and all the seals and stuff. now they stock FD engines
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rev9
Rotary Car Performance
4
Aug 23, 2004 04:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.