General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Turbo II rotors in a 3rd Gen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 10:39 AM
  #1  
1point3liter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Twin Turbo LSX
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 787
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville, Fl
Turbo II rotors in a 3rd Gen?

I've recently popped the motor in my third gen do to lack of fuel system. I a upgrading the fuel system and are just about to rebuild the motor. A fellow in town is recommending I use the lower compression rotors from a 87 or 88 (can't remember) turbo II second gen. He also has mentioned that besides being lower compression (8.5/1 ???), they are lighter meaning faster rev's ect.... What I am concerned about is since the compression of the motor will be dropped, the boost will need to be raised. But.... since the stock turbos aren't effecient at levels above 16psi won't this possibly hurt my performance unless I go to a single turbo? Am I in left field?

Right now my setup consists of.

Street ported motor with 3mm seals.

Downpipe, midpipe, exhaust, large ic.

Non-sequential's

pettit ecu..... but are ordering a haltech, 1600cc inj's, and fuel pump

I'm know the 1600's are over kill for my current setup, but I am looking to go single turbo in the near future.

My current setup is putting down 355rwhp on 13psi and pump gas. (well it's actually broken at the moment, but it did a few weeks back.)

Any insight?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 10:47 AM
  #2  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,864
Likes: 570
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Re: Turbo II rotors in a 3rd Gen?

Originally posted by rx-007
A fellow in town is recommending I use the lower compression rotors from a 87 or 88 (can't remember) turbo II second gen. He also has mentioned that besides being lower compression (8.5/1 ???), they are lighter meaning faster rev's ect....
While they are lower compression (8.5:1 vs. 9:1 on all '89-present turbo RX-7s) they are NOT lighter. '87-88 rotors are about 1/2lb heavier than the later rotors.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2002 | 03:19 PM
  #3  
jbontke's Avatar
Damn security clearances
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
Stick with the newer rotors and the same weight. You could use lower compression but you will have to run more boost to make the same ammount to power, making the car use more fuel. It isn't worth it. The rotors out of an 89-91 TII are the same weight as your 3rd gen rotors and compression.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2002 | 08:19 AM
  #4  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
This really isn't recommended unless you run TONS of boost.&nbsp Yes, the 1986-1988 FC3S turbo rotors are HEAVIER.&nbsp Most people don't know that they are also a lot more STRONGER due to the extra weight.&nbsp Heavy boosted Japan rotary engines run the FC3S Zenki rotors due to their ability to resist deformation from detonation.&nbsp The FC3S Kouki and FD3S rotors seem to easily deform (on their leading rotor faces) from detonation at high boost.&nbsp I wouldn't recommend changing out the rotors unless you regularly seeing over 20psi of boost.&nbsp If you're keeping it around 14psi (or under 20psi), you'll be at an advantage to use the higher compression rotors.

FC3S Zenki = 1986-1988, or Aussies call them Series IV.
FC3S Kouki = 1989-1991, or Aussies call them Series V.



-Ted
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
May 30, 2019 08:47 PM
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
Aug 13, 2015 11:19 AM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.