General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

SU Carburator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2003 | 05:48 PM
  #26  
chairchild's Avatar
50mpg - oooooh yeah!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: UK
I just prefer SU's over ANY carb, they're so much easier to work with because you only have one needle to mess about with, the fuelling is controlled by the vacuum, and they're DAMN SMALL!!

I never did like the Nikki or Holly carbs - too many variables to mess round with
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2003 | 04:59 AM
  #27  
bill Shurvinton's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: UK
No problems with that, but do you actually need seperate primary and secondary SUs because of the way they operate.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2003 | 12:39 PM
  #28  
svenne's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: sweden
Are hurleys intake built so you open primary and secondary port separatly? for twin su?


svenne
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2003 | 03:46 PM
  #29  
cosmicbang's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 4
From: Virginia
Originally posted by svenne
Are hurleys intake built so you open primary and secondary port separatly? for twin su?
Look at the picture I posted earlier in this thread!!! That is a Hurley intake. I got it in around 1988 I think. As you can see it is one carburettor for each rotor. For each carb, one half the air goes to the intermediate housing port and half goes to the end housing port.
Like this:
front carb=primary and secondary ports of front rotor
back carb=primary and secondary ports of back rotor

There is no way to toggle the flow left or right from each carb.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2003 | 05:12 PM
  #30  
chairchild's Avatar
50mpg - oooooh yeah!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: UK
Which is why I don't like them - you don't have as much control over the port fuelling. I'm merely combining the best of both:

# Simplicity of the SU
# Fuelling of a twin/quad barrel carb
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 02:42 AM
  #31  
bill Shurvinton's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: UK
And so I respectfully repeat: there is a reason why ALL SU apps are 1 butterfly per barrel, namely that the constant pressure design of an SU means that you do not have the vacuum signal problems at low throttle opening that drive other designs to need a twin choke setup.

Effectively an SU has a totally variable choke built in. That's what it does best. I look forward to seeing the outcome of your experiments, but am hard pushed to see that there is a problem trying to be solved here.

Happy to be proved wrong.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 04:11 AM
  #32  
svenne's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: sweden
Ok cosmicbang Now I understand
I thougt your intake was homemade
!`m gonna build a intake like yours.
what is the diameter on the runners?

svenne
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 05:42 AM
  #33  
svenne's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: sweden
I had this idea for a couple of years ago so I had a question on our swedish forum but nobody thought
it gonna work because theirs no accelerator pump on the su. then I found out that hurley had a kit with these
and I put in a question here and thanks alot for all information /svenne
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 06:30 AM
  #34  
bill Shurvinton's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: UK
I need to try and get a better picture, but basically the steel plate that bolts onto the engine is cut to the size of the ports and then an oval tube is rolled from sheet, brazed on and the flanges added at the top. The runner to port matching is abysmal on the stock hurleys and I spent evening after evening smoothing it out.

The hurley manifold was not 'designed'. I'll measure the runners tonight.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 06:26 PM
  #35  
chairchild's Avatar
50mpg - oooooh yeah!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: UK
there was a post on here a while ago that gave the calculations needed to tune an intake length to give higher power/efficiency at a certain Rpm. Hurley only made the runners long enough to meet up with the carb, without using too much of a sharp angle
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 08:58 AM
  #36  
cosmicbang's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 4
From: Virginia
Originally posted by chairchild
there was a post on here a while ago that gave the calculations needed to tune an intake length to give higher power/efficiency at a certain Rpm. Hurley only made the runners long enough to meet up with the carb, without using too much of a sharp angle
Yes that is true, I had that conversation with him about runner lengths before he made my intake. Since the end result was acceptable we did not change anything. I was experimenting with phenolic spacers but didn't get any conclusive results. Another characteristic of his intake is that it is tilted upwards to clear the steering on RHD cars. I was initially concerned about the floats being affected but never had any problems with it. If it is going in a LHD car I think the intake could come out horizontally. Let me know if you want more pictures of it.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 02:32 PM
  #37  
svenne's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: sweden
Yes thanks if you have more pictures of it so can send up them or mail me them if you want

svenne
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2003 | 06:38 PM
  #38  
chairchild's Avatar
50mpg - oooooh yeah!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
From: UK
SU's are nearly always placed on an angle anyway. On a rover V8, they're almost at 45 degrees!!!

If anything, you want the runner to be extended AFTER the carb. when you suddenly take off the accelerator, the fuel supply drops. On a normal runner length, this doesn't cause any problems really. But on a tuned inlet, it can be fairly long, and this will cause a load of fuel-rich air to still be going into the engine, causing it be sluggish on throttle response.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2004 | 04:09 AM
  #39  
svenne's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: sweden
hello again!
now is my intake almost finished and the carbs are jetted but i wonder wich float valve I should use? and fuel pressure?It was verry cheap parts to the su carburators hope its gonna run fine

svenne
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MosesX605
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Jun 12, 2003 09:27 AM
Amagi82
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
13
Jan 5, 2003 01:52 PM
joethecomputerdude
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
Jun 5, 2002 06:08 PM
joethecomputerdude
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
6
May 23, 2002 11:37 PM
black99
20B Forum
43
Dec 17, 2001 11:31 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 AM.