Rotary vs Turbine (Jet)
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: I-55 @ I20
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rotary vs Turbine (Jet)
I know a jet has a continuos burn and is not practical for small time apps. Is the rotar Mr. Felix's way of introducing the efficiency (at least hp/cc) to the automotive world?
A jet still uses the Otto cycle, maybe all fuel burners do, so maybe it was taken into consideration when he found a way for the turbine aka eccentric shaft to be propelled/spun using rotor housings.
Any thoughts......please share
A jet still uses the Otto cycle, maybe all fuel burners do, so maybe it was taken into consideration when he found a way for the turbine aka eccentric shaft to be propelled/spun using rotor housings.
Any thoughts......please share
#3
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well now....
For one, the Otto cycle works on these paths (ideally). Isentropic compression (intake), constant volume heat addition (fuel is burned), isentropic expansion (power stroke), constant volume heat rejection (exhaust). A turbine engine DOES NOT operate on this principle.
The turbine engine is based on the Brayton cycle and is as follows. Isentropic compression (by compressor blades), constant-pressure heat addition (combustors), isentropic expansion (in the turbine), constant-pressure heat rejection (exhaust nozzel).
A constant pressure process is not even close to a constant volume process. The ICE burns the fuel at around the top of the piston throw and it will ideally burn before the piston moves far down. Therefore, the combustion applies pressure while the cylinder's volume is relatively constant. This pressure exerts a force on the piston's surface area which in turn propels it downward.
The turbine uses a nozzle along with fan blades to compress the air where it then enters the combustor. The fuel air is ignited and allowed to expand immediately towards the rear of the engine. This expansion is is under a constant pressure. The air then moves through a series of blades within a diffuser and exits the engine. As you can see above, the turbine engine and rotary engine have very little in common (except that they produce, usually, positive net work). Hope this was informative....
For one, the Otto cycle works on these paths (ideally). Isentropic compression (intake), constant volume heat addition (fuel is burned), isentropic expansion (power stroke), constant volume heat rejection (exhaust). A turbine engine DOES NOT operate on this principle.
The turbine engine is based on the Brayton cycle and is as follows. Isentropic compression (by compressor blades), constant-pressure heat addition (combustors), isentropic expansion (in the turbine), constant-pressure heat rejection (exhaust nozzel).
A constant pressure process is not even close to a constant volume process. The ICE burns the fuel at around the top of the piston throw and it will ideally burn before the piston moves far down. Therefore, the combustion applies pressure while the cylinder's volume is relatively constant. This pressure exerts a force on the piston's surface area which in turn propels it downward.
The turbine uses a nozzle along with fan blades to compress the air where it then enters the combustor. The fuel air is ignited and allowed to expand immediately towards the rear of the engine. This expansion is is under a constant pressure. The air then moves through a series of blades within a diffuser and exits the engine. As you can see above, the turbine engine and rotary engine have very little in common (except that they produce, usually, positive net work). Hope this was informative....
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which class? I've taken 5 thermal-fluid science classes so far. When I graduate in May I'm heading to work for GE Aviation on turbine engines. I absolutely love this stuff.
#6
ERTW
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm taking a thermo fluids course. I'm at Mac right now. Where do you go?
When I was at Sheridan College, I worked at Pratt and Whitney Canada in the Drafting and Combustion Departments. It was by far the most interesting job I've ever had in my entire life. The few minutes per week I was able to walk through the Production area made sitting at a desk the rest of the time worth it. I'm sure GE would be no different! Good luck!
When I was at Sheridan College, I worked at Pratt and Whitney Canada in the Drafting and Combustion Departments. It was by far the most interesting job I've ever had in my entire life. The few minutes per week I was able to walk through the Production area made sitting at a desk the rest of the time worth it. I'm sure GE would be no different! Good luck!
#7
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: I-55 @ I20
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was kind of right.
http://www.mazda.com/mazdaspirit/rotary/story/
It just seemed like Wankel liked the jet engine but saw from it's constant pressure process that it was impractical for stop and go, so he made a compromise.
In the link it is coined as, half turbine/half reciprocating
http://www.mazda.com/mazdaspirit/rotary/story/
It just seemed like Wankel liked the jet engine but saw from it's constant pressure process that it was impractical for stop and go, so he made a compromise.
In the link it is coined as, half turbine/half reciprocating
Trending Topics
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only reason turbines are used in aviation is because they make mega-huge power for their size, weight, and cost. piston and rotaries can't come anywhere close to a turbine's power to weight to operating-cost ratio.
anyways, rotaries are simpler (in construction, if not design) than piston engines. Lighter and MUCH fewer moving parts to create friction and break. theoretically, this would mean that rotaries should get better mileage and last longer than comparable piston engines, but pistons have had a head start in design and improvement and rotaries are still catching up. given time and research, rotaries could replace gas powered pistons. (has anyone tried to develop a diesel rotary?)
Only thing rotaries really have in common with turbines is that they go 'round
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Niagara Falls
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i lol'd
The only reason turbines are used in aviation is because they make mega-huge power for their size, weight, and cost. piston and rotaries can't come anywhere close to a turbine's power to weight to operating-cost ratio.
anyways, rotaries are simpler (in construction, if not design) than piston engines. Lighter and MUCH fewer moving parts to create friction and break. theoretically, this would mean that rotaries should get better mileage and last longer than comparable piston engines, but pistons have had a head start in design and improvement and rotaries are still catching up. given time and research, rotaries could replace gas powered pistons. (has anyone tried to develop a diesel rotary?)
Only thing rotaries really have in common with turbines is that they go 'round
The only reason turbines are used in aviation is because they make mega-huge power for their size, weight, and cost. piston and rotaries can't come anywhere close to a turbine's power to weight to operating-cost ratio.
anyways, rotaries are simpler (in construction, if not design) than piston engines. Lighter and MUCH fewer moving parts to create friction and break. theoretically, this would mean that rotaries should get better mileage and last longer than comparable piston engines, but pistons have had a head start in design and improvement and rotaries are still catching up. given time and research, rotaries could replace gas powered pistons. (has anyone tried to develop a diesel rotary?)
Only thing rotaries really have in common with turbines is that they go 'round
It is very similar to the homogeneous charge compression ignition but is easier to control and produces a cleaner exhaust. (This engine runs at a lean condition so few hydrocarbons are expelled). It's a rather interesting idea which could potentially lead to some interesting advancements in rotary technology.
#14
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
http://www.turbinecowboy.com/carstru...hotoalbum_view
http://science.howstuffworks.com/m1-tank2.htm
As stated in other posts, a typical turbine engine operates by the Brayton cycle.
#16
Lost You in the Rear View
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rocky Hill, CT
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i thought we were talkin about my ex girlfriend for a minute here til i read the rest of the thread.
anyone here ever try making one of those jet engines with a car turbo?
Homemade Jet Engine Video
anyone here ever try making one of those jet engines with a car turbo?
Homemade Jet Engine Video
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post