General Rotary Tech Support Use this forum for tech questions not specific to a certain model year
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

13b bellhousing/rear iron bolt pattern w/ dimensions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2012 | 12:23 PM
  #1  
valley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 307
Likes: 2
From: VA
13b bellhousing/rear iron bolt pattern w/ dimensions

As the title says, I'm looking for the dimensions of the bolt pattern for the 13b. I need it to reference to either the center of the e-shaft or input shaft. Something similar to this:

Reply
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 01:39 AM
  #2  
sen2two's Avatar
Rx2 > FD
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 8
From: Florida, Orlando
I looked for similar before and didn't find anything. Your best bet is to measure it yourself.

Are you making a transmission adapter plate?
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 06:33 AM
  #3  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
I havent double checked these yet, so id pull some measurements yourself before making anything

Ignore the grey holes, they are for a non-mazda transmission



They were pulled from a s4 t2 rear iron.

-Jacob
Attached Thumbnails 13b bellhousing/rear iron bolt pattern w/ dimensions-iron-geometry.jpg  

Last edited by CrackHeadMel; Jan 1, 2013 at 06:36 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 12:25 PM
  #4  
valley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 307
Likes: 2
From: VA
Sen, yup, for an adapter plate. I already have one made but it could be considered a prototype at best and I want a much cleaner, and easier to make one this time around. I don't have a set of calipers large enough to get measurements.

Jacob, thanks very much! If you don't mind my asking, what did you use to get the measurements?

I also sent Mazda USA an e-mail asking for this information, if/when I get a response I'll post what they say.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 02:31 PM
  #5  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,848
Likes: 563
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Those gray holes look a little bit like the VWAG dual bolt pattern transaxles built starting in 1988 or so.

If that's the case, this is really relative to my interests

I personally took a dead smoothcase trans, cut the front housing off just aft of the front bulkhead, removed the input shaft from the remains of the geartrain, and re-inserted it into the case. Plan is/was to adapt the smoothcase to a VW four for RWD conversion of something else. There are certain synchronicities that make this a viable project. I was just going to dial-indicate the mockup against an engine and build the adapter in place.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 03:23 PM
  #6  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
Vally,

I took the measurements with a mitatoyo digital height gauge that's in current iso calibration. Im going to do it one more time just to be sure.

Peejay,

your close.. its more of the 2001 era. Now if i could only find a way to make a starter fit without cutting anything.

Ill post pics when i actualy machine something. Right now its just a block of 7075 hanging around

-Jacob
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 07:35 PM
  #7  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,848
Likes: 563
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by CrackHeadMel
Vally,
your close.. its more of the 2001 era. Now if i could only find a way to make a starter fit without cutting anything.
Wow! Nice. Same thing actually, it's a combination of the inline four and inline fove bolt patterns. Nutshell - the 016 transmissions (everything up to 1991) (in North America) were only made with the five/V6/V8 pattern, while the 01A ('88-up small chassis) and 01E (S-car heavy duty big mammajamma) were dual pattern.

Again, relevant to my interests I've been steadily amassing much four- and five-cylinder performance hardware. But you're thinking of going the OTHER direction, of course.

Two questions - are you planning on a 225 or 240mm clutch disc? If 225, do you think you'd have room to cut out part of the top-left of the transmission to clear the topmount starter? They stopped using them in '73 but all engines up to 1992 are machined to use it. I THINK the 016's slave cylinder is lower than that, but you're not using an 016...
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 08:00 PM
  #8  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
Originally Posted by peejay
Wow! Nice. Same thing actually, it's a combination of the inline four and inline fove bolt patterns. Nutshell - the 016 transmissions (everything up to 1991) (in North America) were only made with the five/V6/V8 pattern, while the 01A ('88-up small chassis) and 01E (S-car heavy duty big mammajamma) were dual pattern.

Again, relevant to my interests I've been steadily amassing much four- and five-cylinder performance hardware. But you're thinking of going the OTHER direction, of course.

Two questions - are you planning on a 225 or 240mm clutch disc? If 225, do you think you'd have room to cut out part of the top-left of the transmission to clear the topmount starter? They stopped using them in '73 but all engines up to 1992 are machined to use it. I THINK the 016's slave cylinder is lower than that, but you're not using an 016...
No 016 for me, i settled for an 012 / g86 to get me started. while it might blow up, i can easily go and pick up another one just about anywhere.

One thing i really like about it is i don't have to flip or invert it, its already pointing the right way

I haven't decided on a clutch at all yet. The t2 flywheel will not even pretend to fit within the 012 / g86 bell-housing so I am waiting on a cosmo flex-plate to arrive and I am going to either make an adapter to mount a vw flywheel, or my preferred route will be to make a button flywheel and use whatever clutch pressure plate i want as long as its got the correct splines for the transmission. I like the button flywheel idea as I can make an aluminium one to whatever weight i want and just make a steel friction surface, no need for a ring gear as the flex-plate will do all the starting duty

I am actually hopping to use a starter in the typical rotary starter location and really hopping i can avoid notching the bell housing, sadly i got rid of all my starters in a fire sale a month or two ago, and no have none for test fitment

-Jacob
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2013 | 05:07 PM
  #9  
valley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 307
Likes: 2
From: VA
I just got an e-mail from Mazda USA Customer Assistance Center. Needless to say it was less than helpful. They basically told me to purchase the FSM. I called the person to clarify my requirements and that what I'm looking for isn't in the FSM. In trying to inquire further I was more or less told that they rely on dealerships for technical data. So... I'm going to call a dealership in the next few days and see if I can find some hidden listing for something resembling an archival or engineering department.

Jacob, I made an AutoCAD drawing of the adapter plate layout using your first measurements and double checked one for its distance from center and it appears more or less correct. If by weeks end I've not heard back I'll see if I can make the new plate and report how it goes. I already made a block to reposition the slave cylinder and inch forward and trimmed the rod.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2013 | 05:15 PM
  #10  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
Well that's unfortunate. I checked the FSM as well, didn't see any bell-housing or iron bolt pattern's listed.

-Jacob
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2013 | 04:18 PM
  #11  
valley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 307
Likes: 2
From: VA
Follow up:

Good news, Jacob's measurements are very well done. I checked two of the holes with my smaller calipers and got about the right reading (hand calipers and only good for a ballpark figure). I remade my plate on a Mill recently and everything lined up excellently. When everything was installed on the engine with my flywheel/pilot bearing adapter the transmission spun easily by hand (I was spinning it using the output shaft) when in any gear and would continue spinning when I would give it a flick then let go in 5th (another 90 degrees or so depending).

Of note, IIRC, all of the transmission bolts are M10x1.25. The end of the input shaft is 15mm (~0.59"). The two guides for the bell housing are slightly under 15mm OD. I made two short rods that would stick out of my adapter plate ~0.4" with a rounded edge and an OD of ~0.588". I recommend (depending on what you can do or have access too) hardening the threads on the plate at a minimum. If you are able I would recommend welding nuts on the backside of the plate. Weld-in hardened threaded inserts are also good.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 01:22 PM
  #12  
misterstyx69's Avatar
Retired Moderator, RIP
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (142)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 136
From: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
This thread should get Copied and Stickied somewhere.
That is Valuable info for an alternate transmission installation.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2013 | 08:42 PM
  #13  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,999
Likes: 349
From: FL
^ agreed.

also, i'm not sure how I missed a discussion that involved Audis. that sucks. at least now I know that I can use an 01A until I can get my hands on a 01E (these SOBs are still pretty expensive).
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2013 | 02:01 AM
  #14  
joshrulz's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: brisbane
does anyone know if the s4 and s5 share the same rearplate/g box bolt hole pattern with a s6 rear plate.
im looking to get this
In Development: PR TREMAC T56 Magnum Adapter Plate | Pettit Racing

but i own a fc, so im hoping i can use a s5 bell housing with the pettit adaptor or at worst use the s6 bellhousing.

thanks in advance
josh
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2013 | 05:31 PM
  #15  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,999
Likes: 349
From: FL
all rotary-to-transmission bolt patterns are the same.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2013 | 05:39 PM
  #16  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by diabolical1
all rotary-to-manual transmission bolt patterns are the same.
fixed that
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2013 | 06:33 PM
  #17  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,999
Likes: 349
From: FL
I admit ... i'm at a bit of a loss now. what detail on automatics am I missing?
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2013 | 03:43 AM
  #18  
joshrulz's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: brisbane
thanks guys, just needed some confirmation.
heres the difference between manual and auto
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generati...d-help-925714/
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2013 | 12:27 PM
  #19  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by diabolical1
I admit ... i'm at a bit of a loss now. what detail on automatics am I missing?
1 bolt is missing from the bellhousing mount to the rear iron(2 different rear irons). the older gen autos were direct but the later gens you could only use 4 mounting bolts as the starters bolted to the side of the engine instead of inside the bellhousing(renesis, RE and REW). this flat starter mount omitted one mount hole for the manual transmission.

granted most people never run into an issue with using just 4 mount bolts on swapped engines/trannies. it also leaves a gap for the flywheel to be exposed.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; Sep 2, 2013 at 12:33 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2013 | 04:38 PM
  #20  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,848
Likes: 563
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution
fixed that
You mean, all 10A-based engines, right? 13A was different.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2013 | 05:03 PM
  #21  
diabolical1's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,999
Likes: 349
From: FL
Originally Posted by RotaryEvolution
1 bolt is missing from the bellhousing mount to the rear iron(2 different rear irons). the older gen autos were direct but the later gens you could only use 4 mounting bolts as the starters bolted to the side of the engine instead of inside the bellhousing(renesis, RE and REW). this flat starter mount omitted one mount hole for the manual transmission.
thanks for the education. and now I see why I never knew it. I've never had to pull any automatic RE/REW or MSPs apart - at least, not yet.


Peejay, I never even gave the 13A a thought.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2013 | 08:07 PM
  #22  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,848
Likes: 563
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Nobody ever does Just being a pissant pedant is all, don't mind me.

I've never played with one either, but I bet that the bellhousing changeup happened at the same time they eliminated the notch at the top for the topmount starter, which also served as the access hole for the flexplate to torque converter nuts. I know FCs have the notch and FDs don't. From the description of how the starter attaches, the mounting was changed so as to provide access to those nuts once the starter is removed.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2013 | 12:21 PM
  #23  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
actually looks like i was incorrect, but i do still somewhat remember one version not having the top driver side mount hole, here is a picture of an REW auto iron and it has the mount hole. it's not like the autos are all that common on anything aside from the MSP engine anyways.

Name:  IMG_4986.jpg
Views: 8160
Size:  129.4 KB

it does have the unused mount hole between that one at the top center.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; Sep 3, 2013 at 12:23 PM.
Reply
Old May 18, 2021 | 02:32 PM
  #24  
FC_VRX-7's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 5
Likes: 1
From: Cobar, NSW Australia
[QUOTE=peejay;11331655]Those gray holes look a little bit like the VWAG dual bolt pattern transaxles built starting in 1988 or so.

Just stumbled upon this thread while looking for the bellhousing bolt pattern. I'm adapting my gearbox to a VW VR5 and the fact that you lads are talking about Audi engines is a bit uncanny seeing as though VW used the same bolt pattern as Audi in many of their early 2000's engines, and as a matter of fact my VR5 that I bought off eBay came with an O1E adaptor plate bolted to it. Anyways thanks for the help
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
13
Jan 9, 2018 11:19 AM
befarrer
Old School and Other Rotary
2
Oct 5, 2015 03:30 AM
tonka_1956
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
1
Sep 2, 2015 05:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.