Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

18x11 (R) trailing arm clearance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2005 | 09:55 PM
  #1  
gfelber's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 528
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
18x11 (R) trailing arm clearance

Many folks have been asking me how much clearance there is between my 18x11 +48 offset rear wheels, 295-30 tires and the tubular trailing arms. Attaching a good pic. You can see that it's pretty tight. You can squeeze a 305-30 Hoosier on there as they're just a tad wider than the Pirelli P Zeros (a very wide tire in this size), but a 315 will not work.

Regards,

Gene
PS- Thanks for the pic, Daniels.
Attached Thumbnails 18x11 (R) trailing arm clearance-trailing_arm_clearance2.jpg  
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 10:19 PM
  #2  
Carlos Iglesias's Avatar
Corn-to-Noise Converter
Veteran: Navy
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 502
From: The Elysian Fields (Texas)
Excellent contribution (as usual) Gene. Thanks!
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 11:20 PM
  #3  
Mdessouki's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 2
From: Va
heres a **** from the outside. Not that relevent to the topic but shows how much needs to be removed from the 1/4 pannnel.
Attached Thumbnails 18x11 (R) trailing arm clearance-p41104541.jpg  

Last edited by Mdessouki; May 17, 2005 at 11:24 PM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 11:35 PM
  #4  
EricM's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Is that 18x11 wide wheels and 295 tires on all fours ? Did you pull the fenders on the front ?
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 11:53 PM
  #5  
johgar's Avatar
Garage_Techno
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 973
Likes: 13
From: Seattle, WA.
I know that he is running 18"x10" on front with 285. THe 18"x11" is only for the rear.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 11:53 PM
  #6  
88fc3sw/HX83's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 930
Likes: 1
From: Oregon
I wish they made aftermarket trailing arms for the FC. Right now my 18x10 are CLOSE (couple of mm) from the trailing arms.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 10:31 AM
  #7  
RX-Ben's Avatar
Losing Traction on 335s
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: NYC
It looks like there is some rubbing between the tire and the trailing arm? Or was that something else?


On an FC- if you have power (300hp/tq+) you will get rubbing between the tire and the trailing arm, even with 1/4" of static clearance.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #8  
CrispyRX7's Avatar
Polishing Fiend
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (139)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,391
Likes: 48
From: MD
Gene,
If'n I may chime in. I run Brads old 17x11 CCWs in the rear 50mm offset with 275 HooHoos.
I have coilovers and the M2 trailing arms. Suspension travel will affect interference issues.
At near full droop on my car the tire rubs on the trailing arms. And I have the trailing arms shimmed all the way inboard at the chassis end. When on the track tire and hub flex can eat up several mm of clearance. I found this out the hard way. I'd estimate I had 2 mm of clearence between tire/wheel and trailing arm with the suspension statically loaded. Then I went to VIR and with the rear suspension dynamically loaded up (acceleration and cornering) I did groove the trailing arm on the drivers side to a depth of about 1-2mm. So I shimmed the chassis end of the trailing arm over some more and the problem went away.

So just a word of caution when we start speaking of clearences in the 1-2mm or the thickness of a sheet of paper one may not be accounting for all tolerances.

Food for thought,
Crispy
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #9  
gfelber's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 528
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by carlos@the-rotary.net
Excellent contribution (as usual) Gene. Thanks!
You're too kind

Gene
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 11:56 AM
  #10  
gfelber's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 528
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by RX-Ben
It looks like there is some rubbing between the tire and the trailing arm? Or was that something else?


On an FC- if you have power (300hp/tq+) you will get rubbing between the tire and the trailing arm, even with 1/4" of static clearance.

No, that's fingerprints.

Gene
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #11  
gfelber's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 528
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by CrispyRX7
Gene,
If'n I may chime in. I run Brads old 17x11 CCWs in the rear 50mm offset with 275 HooHoos.
I have coilovers and the M2 trailing arms. Suspension travel will affect interference issues.
At near full droop on my car the tire rubs on the trailing arms. And I have the trailing arms shimmed all the way inboard at the chassis end. When on the track tire and hub flex can eat up several mm of clearance. I found this out the hard way. I'd estimate I had 2 mm of clearence between tire/wheel and trailing arm with the suspension statically loaded. Then I went to VIR and with the rear suspension dynamically loaded up (acceleration and cornering) I did groove the trailing arm on the drivers side to a depth of about 1-2mm. So I shimmed the chassis end of the trailing arm over some more and the problem went away.

So just a word of caution when we start speaking of clearences in the 1-2mm or the thickness of a sheet of paper one may not be accounting for all tolerances.

Food for thought,
Crispy

Good point. I'll keep an eye on it. May be exacerbated by using a taller sidewall ( a la 305) as well.

Gene
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 12:02 PM
  #12  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
I would be very leery of those tires rubbing when on the track. Tires move around a lot due to sidewall flex. Granted the most movement is at the bottom of the tire where the contact patch is, but the entire carcass moves around during high cornering loads. I'd shoot for more space there.

Here are some pics showing my 245/45/16 tires during cornering. At rest the sidewalls stick out almost a 1/4" past the wheel lip.


Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #13  
Rx_treme's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, AZ
True true, but the 16's also have a much taller sidewall allowing more flex.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 03:38 PM
  #14  
DamonB's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 8
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Rx_treme
True true, but the 16's also have a much taller sidewall allowing more flex.
True the 17" or 18" should not flex as much but fact is a few fractions of an inch is not enough clearance during cornering. If 17" or 18" tires didn't have sidewall flex during cornering none of us would ever have the need to run negative camber...
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 05:30 PM
  #15  
gfelber's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 528
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by DamonB
I would be very leery of those tires rubbing when on the track. Tires move around a lot due to sidewall flex. Granted the most movement is at the bottom of the tire where the contact patch is, but the entire carcass moves around during high cornering loads. I'd shoot for more space there.

Here are some pics showing my 245/45/16 tires during cornering. At rest the sidewalls stick out almost a 1/4" past the wheel lip.



Noted. Will have to test them out. The good news is that the picture is somewhat misleading. That is, there's about a finger's width of clearance between the tire and the trailing arm near the rim (i.e. where the tire mounts to the rim). That's approximately 1/2" (depending on how large your fingers are, of course). I don't expect the tire to flex more than 1/2" in that area (likely at max section width, though), but Crispy's comment about hub flex may certainly play a role too.

In summary, don't buy 18x11's with +48mm offset (and wide tires) for track use until I can get some data.


Thanks guys,

Gene
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #16  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,282
Likes: 703
From: Arlington, VA
You might be surprised. I've got rubber marks on my stock trailing arms from one of my 10"/275 combos... either the 17x10 +44 Fikses w/ 275/40's or the 18x10 +42 BBS w/ 275/35. Nothing that looks like rim contact, so i'm not too stressed about it.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 02:18 PM
  #17  
wanklin's Avatar
Rob
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 1
From: Northern Virginia
back from the dead ;o)

This question is for Gene and Crispy,

So to generalize, the main issue here is the trailing arm clearance correct (assuming that we are talking about ~2.5" springs)? Ignoring the trailing arms, how much of a gap would you say there was between the coils and the tires on your car in the rear? What diameter coils are you running and what tires are you currently using, this thread is pretty old so you may be using different rubber now?



thanks,
Rob

Last edited by wanklin; Nov 21, 2005 at 02:20 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2005 | 06:04 PM
  #18  
dclin's Avatar
Perpetual Project
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by wanklin
back from the dead ;o)

This question is for Gene and Crispy,

So to generalize, the main issue here is the trailing arm clearance correct (assuming that we are talking about ~2.5" springs)? Ignoring the trailing arms, how much of a gap would you say there was between the coils and the tires on your car in the rear? What diameter coils are you running and what tires are you currently using, this thread is pretty old so you may be using different rubber now?



thanks,
Rob
The coil diameter should be a non issue in the rear. The coils sit above wheel/tire in back.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 08:24 AM
  #19  
wanklin's Avatar
Rob
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 1
From: Northern Virginia
damn, how did I not notice that. I just went out to the car and verified it.

-Rob
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 01:08 PM
  #20  
CrispyRX7's Avatar
Polishing Fiend
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (139)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,391
Likes: 48
From: MD
Wanklin,
So what would your question then be? I've run 275/40 R17 Hoohoos on 17x11 CCWs with 50mm offset and had rim to trailing arm contact (aftermarket M2 arms). I reshimmed the arms all the way inboard and I now have enough clearance. Minimal 1-2 mm but it's enough. And FWIW the rubbing was only under severe dynamic loading. Just enough flex in the suspension bushings/joints and wheel rim and bearings for thre rim contact the trailing arm. I can load the suspension up pretty good on Hoohoos On the street I run the Kinesis K58 18x10 rims. I'm not sure what the offset is but IIRC it's 50mm also. With a 285/35 R18 Bridgestone Potensa S02A's. No interference issues with trailing arms.
HTH,
Crispy
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 01:56 PM
  #21  
wanklin's Avatar
Rob
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 1
From: Northern Virginia
Originally Posted by dclin
The coil diameter should be a non issue in the rear. The coils sit above wheel/tire in back.

It looks like the collar could be an issue though, it's tough to tell with the car on jackstands.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 02:00 PM
  #22  
wanklin's Avatar
Rob
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 1
From: Northern Virginia
Originally Posted by CrispyRX7
Wanklin,
So what would your question then be? I've run 275/40 R17 Hoohoos on 17x11 CCWs with 50mm offset and had rim to trailing arm contact (aftermarket M2 arms). I reshimmed the arms all the way inboard and I now have enough clearance. Minimal 1-2 mm but it's enough. And FWIW the rubbing was only under severe dynamic loading. Just enough flex in the suspension bushings/joints and wheel rim and bearings for thre rim contact the trailing arm. I can load the suspension up pretty good on Hoohoos On the street I run the Kinesis K58 18x10 rims. I'm not sure what the offset is but IIRC it's 50mm also. With a 285/35 R18 Bridgestone Potensa S02A's. No interference issues with trailing arms.
HTH,
Crispy

What would you estimate the gap is between the tire and strut assembly? I appreciate your clarification on the trailing arm clearance and offset. I am working on something that will eliminate the trailing arm issue, which is why I ask about the strut clearance.

Also do you by chance know the true width of the rim?

last question, what did you do to your fenders to make your current setup fit?



thanks,
Rob

Last edited by wanklin; Nov 22, 2005 at 02:03 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2005 | 08:29 AM
  #23  
CrispyRX7's Avatar
Polishing Fiend
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (139)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,391
Likes: 48
From: MD
Originally Posted by wanklin
What would you estimate the gap is between the tire and strut assembly? I appreciate your clarification on the trailing arm clearance and offset. I am working on something that will eliminate the trailing arm issue, which is why I ask about the strut clearance.
I'll take a look this weekend and let you know exactly

Also do you by chance know the true width of the rim?
sorry I don't. Both wheels (CCW and Kinesis) were bought used with tires mounted. A call to either vender will most likely get you an answer

last question, what did you do to your fenders to make your current setup fit?
In the rear, a little bit oif fender roll at the upper most part of the lip. Approx. a 6 inch section. Rolled them myslef

Crispy
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dona1326cosprings7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Oct 29, 2015 06:47 AM
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Sep 30, 2015 05:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.