Suspension/Wheels/Tires/Brakes

18x11 (R) trailing arm clearance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-05, 09:55 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
gfelber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
18x11 (R) trailing arm clearance

Many folks have been asking me how much clearance there is between my 18x11 +48 offset rear wheels, 295-30 tires and the tubular trailing arms. Attaching a good pic. You can see that it's pretty tight. You can squeeze a 305-30 Hoosier on there as they're just a tad wider than the Pirelli P Zeros (a very wide tire in this size), but a 315 will not work.

Regards,

Gene
PS- Thanks for the pic, Daniels.
Attached Thumbnails 18x11 (R) trailing arm clearance-trailing_arm_clearance2.jpg  
Old 05-17-05, 10:19 PM
  #2  
Corn-to-Noise Converter


iTrader: (6)
 
Carlos Iglesias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Elysian Fields (Texas)
Posts: 1,527
Received 386 Likes on 154 Posts
Excellent contribution (as usual) Gene. Thanks!
Old 05-17-05, 11:20 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (7)
 
Mdessouki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Va
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
heres a **** from the outside. Not that relevent to the topic but shows how much needs to be removed from the 1/4 pannnel.
Attached Thumbnails 18x11 (R) trailing arm clearance-p41104541.jpg  

Last edited by Mdessouki; 05-17-05 at 11:24 PM.
Old 05-17-05, 11:35 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
EricM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that 18x11 wide wheels and 295 tires on all fours ? Did you pull the fenders on the front ?
Old 05-17-05, 11:53 PM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (21)
 
johgar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle, WA.
Posts: 940
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
I know that he is running 18"x10" on front with 285. THe 18"x11" is only for the rear.
Old 05-17-05, 11:53 PM
  #6  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
88fc3sw/HX83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wish they made aftermarket trailing arms for the FC. Right now my 18x10 are CLOSE (couple of mm) from the trailing arms.
Old 05-18-05, 10:31 AM
  #7  
Losing Traction on 335s

 
RX-Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It looks like there is some rubbing between the tire and the trailing arm? Or was that something else?


On an FC- if you have power (300hp/tq+) you will get rubbing between the tire and the trailing arm, even with 1/4" of static clearance.
Old 05-18-05, 11:44 AM
  #8  
Polishing Fiend

iTrader: (139)
 
CrispyRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MD
Posts: 3,393
Received 42 Likes on 22 Posts
Gene,
If'n I may chime in. I run Brads old 17x11 CCWs in the rear 50mm offset with 275 HooHoos.
I have coilovers and the M2 trailing arms. Suspension travel will affect interference issues.
At near full droop on my car the tire rubs on the trailing arms. And I have the trailing arms shimmed all the way inboard at the chassis end. When on the track tire and hub flex can eat up several mm of clearance. I found this out the hard way. I'd estimate I had 2 mm of clearence between tire/wheel and trailing arm with the suspension statically loaded. Then I went to VIR and with the rear suspension dynamically loaded up (acceleration and cornering) I did groove the trailing arm on the drivers side to a depth of about 1-2mm. So I shimmed the chassis end of the trailing arm over some more and the problem went away.

So just a word of caution when we start speaking of clearences in the 1-2mm or the thickness of a sheet of paper one may not be accounting for all tolerances.

Food for thought,
Crispy
Old 05-18-05, 11:55 AM
  #9  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
gfelber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by carlos@the-rotary.net
Excellent contribution (as usual) Gene. Thanks!
You're too kind

Gene
Old 05-18-05, 11:56 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
gfelber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX-Ben
It looks like there is some rubbing between the tire and the trailing arm? Or was that something else?


On an FC- if you have power (300hp/tq+) you will get rubbing between the tire and the trailing arm, even with 1/4" of static clearance.

No, that's fingerprints.

Gene
Old 05-18-05, 11:58 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
gfelber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CrispyRX7
Gene,
If'n I may chime in. I run Brads old 17x11 CCWs in the rear 50mm offset with 275 HooHoos.
I have coilovers and the M2 trailing arms. Suspension travel will affect interference issues.
At near full droop on my car the tire rubs on the trailing arms. And I have the trailing arms shimmed all the way inboard at the chassis end. When on the track tire and hub flex can eat up several mm of clearance. I found this out the hard way. I'd estimate I had 2 mm of clearence between tire/wheel and trailing arm with the suspension statically loaded. Then I went to VIR and with the rear suspension dynamically loaded up (acceleration and cornering) I did groove the trailing arm on the drivers side to a depth of about 1-2mm. So I shimmed the chassis end of the trailing arm over some more and the problem went away.

So just a word of caution when we start speaking of clearences in the 1-2mm or the thickness of a sheet of paper one may not be accounting for all tolerances.

Food for thought,
Crispy

Good point. I'll keep an eye on it. May be exacerbated by using a taller sidewall ( a la 305) as well.

Gene
Old 05-18-05, 12:02 PM
  #12  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
I would be very leery of those tires rubbing when on the track. Tires move around a lot due to sidewall flex. Granted the most movement is at the bottom of the tire where the contact patch is, but the entire carcass moves around during high cornering loads. I'd shoot for more space there.

Here are some pics showing my 245/45/16 tires during cornering. At rest the sidewalls stick out almost a 1/4" past the wheel lip.


Old 05-18-05, 03:14 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

 
Rx_treme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True true, but the 16's also have a much taller sidewall allowing more flex.
Old 05-18-05, 03:38 PM
  #14  
Lives on the Forum

 
DamonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,617
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Rx_treme
True true, but the 16's also have a much taller sidewall allowing more flex.
True the 17" or 18" should not flex as much but fact is a few fractions of an inch is not enough clearance during cornering. If 17" or 18" tires didn't have sidewall flex during cornering none of us would ever have the need to run negative camber...
Old 05-18-05, 05:30 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
gfelber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DamonB
I would be very leery of those tires rubbing when on the track. Tires move around a lot due to sidewall flex. Granted the most movement is at the bottom of the tire where the contact patch is, but the entire carcass moves around during high cornering loads. I'd shoot for more space there.

Here are some pics showing my 245/45/16 tires during cornering. At rest the sidewalls stick out almost a 1/4" past the wheel lip.



Noted. Will have to test them out. The good news is that the picture is somewhat misleading. That is, there's about a finger's width of clearance between the tire and the trailing arm near the rim (i.e. where the tire mounts to the rim). That's approximately 1/2" (depending on how large your fingers are, of course). I don't expect the tire to flex more than 1/2" in that area (likely at max section width, though), but Crispy's comment about hub flex may certainly play a role too.

In summary, don't buy 18x11's with +48mm offset (and wide tires) for track use until I can get some data.


Thanks guys,

Gene
Old 05-18-05, 09:04 PM
  #16  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (9)
 
ptrhahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 9,022
Received 498 Likes on 272 Posts
You might be surprised. I've got rubber marks on my stock trailing arms from one of my 10"/275 combos... either the 17x10 +44 Fikses w/ 275/40's or the 18x10 +42 BBS w/ 275/35. Nothing that looks like rim contact, so i'm not too stressed about it.
Old 11-21-05, 02:18 PM
  #17  
Rob

iTrader: (2)
 
wanklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
back from the dead ;o)

This question is for Gene and Crispy,

So to generalize, the main issue here is the trailing arm clearance correct (assuming that we are talking about ~2.5" springs)? Ignoring the trailing arms, how much of a gap would you say there was between the coils and the tires on your car in the rear? What diameter coils are you running and what tires are you currently using, this thread is pretty old so you may be using different rubber now?



thanks,
Rob

Last edited by wanklin; 11-21-05 at 02:20 PM.
Old 11-21-05, 06:04 PM
  #18  
Perpetual Project

iTrader: (4)
 
dclin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by wanklin
back from the dead ;o)

This question is for Gene and Crispy,

So to generalize, the main issue here is the trailing arm clearance correct (assuming that we are talking about ~2.5" springs)? Ignoring the trailing arms, how much of a gap would you say there was between the coils and the tires on your car in the rear? What diameter coils are you running and what tires are you currently using, this thread is pretty old so you may be using different rubber now?



thanks,
Rob
The coil diameter should be a non issue in the rear. The coils sit above wheel/tire in back.
Old 11-22-05, 08:24 AM
  #19  
Rob

iTrader: (2)
 
wanklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
damn, how did I not notice that. I just went out to the car and verified it.

-Rob
Old 11-22-05, 01:08 PM
  #20  
Polishing Fiend

iTrader: (139)
 
CrispyRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MD
Posts: 3,393
Received 42 Likes on 22 Posts
Wanklin,
So what would your question then be? I've run 275/40 R17 Hoohoos on 17x11 CCWs with 50mm offset and had rim to trailing arm contact (aftermarket M2 arms). I reshimmed the arms all the way inboard and I now have enough clearance. Minimal 1-2 mm but it's enough. And FWIW the rubbing was only under severe dynamic loading. Just enough flex in the suspension bushings/joints and wheel rim and bearings for thre rim contact the trailing arm. I can load the suspension up pretty good on Hoohoos On the street I run the Kinesis K58 18x10 rims. I'm not sure what the offset is but IIRC it's 50mm also. With a 285/35 R18 Bridgestone Potensa S02A's. No interference issues with trailing arms.
HTH,
Crispy
Old 11-22-05, 01:56 PM
  #21  
Rob

iTrader: (2)
 
wanklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dclin
The coil diameter should be a non issue in the rear. The coils sit above wheel/tire in back.

It looks like the collar could be an issue though, it's tough to tell with the car on jackstands.
Old 11-22-05, 02:00 PM
  #22  
Rob

iTrader: (2)
 
wanklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,234
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CrispyRX7
Wanklin,
So what would your question then be? I've run 275/40 R17 Hoohoos on 17x11 CCWs with 50mm offset and had rim to trailing arm contact (aftermarket M2 arms). I reshimmed the arms all the way inboard and I now have enough clearance. Minimal 1-2 mm but it's enough. And FWIW the rubbing was only under severe dynamic loading. Just enough flex in the suspension bushings/joints and wheel rim and bearings for thre rim contact the trailing arm. I can load the suspension up pretty good on Hoohoos On the street I run the Kinesis K58 18x10 rims. I'm not sure what the offset is but IIRC it's 50mm also. With a 285/35 R18 Bridgestone Potensa S02A's. No interference issues with trailing arms.
HTH,
Crispy

What would you estimate the gap is between the tire and strut assembly? I appreciate your clarification on the trailing arm clearance and offset. I am working on something that will eliminate the trailing arm issue, which is why I ask about the strut clearance.

Also do you by chance know the true width of the rim?

last question, what did you do to your fenders to make your current setup fit?



thanks,
Rob

Last edited by wanklin; 11-22-05 at 02:03 PM.
Old 11-25-05, 08:29 AM
  #23  
Polishing Fiend

iTrader: (139)
 
CrispyRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MD
Posts: 3,393
Received 42 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by wanklin
What would you estimate the gap is between the tire and strut assembly? I appreciate your clarification on the trailing arm clearance and offset. I am working on something that will eliminate the trailing arm issue, which is why I ask about the strut clearance.
I'll take a look this weekend and let you know exactly

Also do you by chance know the true width of the rim?
sorry I don't. Both wheels (CCW and Kinesis) were bought used with tires mounted. A call to either vender will most likely get you an answer

last question, what did you do to your fenders to make your current setup fit?
In the rear, a little bit oif fender roll at the upper most part of the lip. Approx. a 6 inch section. Rolled them myslef

Crispy
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dona1326cosprings7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
10-29-15 06:47 AM
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
09-30-15 05:58 PM



Quick Reply: 18x11 (R) trailing arm clearance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.