3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

99' twins vs stock twins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 05:48 PM
  #1  
AWD-RWD racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
99' twins vs stock twins

sure it been brought up before, but my search came up empty. if I were to switch out the stock twins for the 99 jspec twins, besides a quicker spool up is there any type of hp gain? thank you in advance.
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 06:19 PM
  #2  
yuichiror's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, Va
The 99' FD's were rated at 285hp at the "crank". Not sure how much of that was due to the new turbos. I THINK the only other modified engine part was the Y pipe.
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 06:27 PM
  #3  
BlueRex's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by AWD-RWD racer
...but my search came up empty.
Search again...
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 06:29 PM
  #4  
AWD-RWD racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
Originally Posted by BlueRex
Search again...
wow your so smart, wish i would have thought of that. ive been searching since i posted.

Old Apr 19, 2006 | 06:34 PM
  #5  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
Originally Posted by yuichiror
The 99' FD's were rated at 285hp at the "crank". Not sure how much of that was due to the new turbos. I THINK the only other modified engine part was the Y pipe.
280ps (=276hp). Y-pipe, better airbox, better airflow in general, thinner dp (= more flow), better cat-back, better turbos, _more boost_

(Although they run more than 280ps stock (despite what mazda say))

that said - you'd be mad to swap out the standard twins if there was nothing wrong with them.
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #6  
bacek's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
From: los angeles
it will spool up quicker but from a cost standpoint it would be cheaper to just save up for engine management and tuning as that will give you the biggest gains.... i think there might be a difference ultimately in power but it is not really a huge difference maybe not even a real noticeable difference... then again this is from the years of reading these type of threads and no real world testing on my part (i dont even own an fd) hope that helps and do search as it does get very technical in some discussions
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #7  
DaiOni's Avatar
Wankler
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 2
From: Kobe, Japan
...and there are multiple threads on the subject - try revising your search with terms such as '280ps', '280hp', or 'efini twins' (incorrect terminology - but often used)
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 06:45 PM
  #8  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
No significant gain at the same boost level.
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 07:22 PM
  #9  
John Magnuson's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by rynberg
No significant gain at the same boost level.
Rynberg is right. I went ahead and replaced my worn twins with the 99 spec while I did an engine rebuild. I wasn't looking for more power... just better reliability.

I rebuilt the engine at the same time and an older engine always has a bit more power (broken in better) but I have not notice any perceptible power gain at the same boost levels.
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 07:29 PM
  #10  
dradon03's Avatar
Derwin
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 0
From: MTL, QC
Just upgrade your stock twins to BNR Stage 3's. It will be less expensive and you will have much room to play for power.
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 07:39 PM
  #11  
AWD-RWD racer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
From: pennsylvania
im not looking to upgrade. Im purchasing a fd and it already has them on it. I was just trying to find out a difference for my power referance. thank you all very much for your input
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 09:55 AM
  #12  
BlueRex's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by AWD-RWD racer
wow you're so smart, wish i would have thought of that.
Thanks

ive been searching since i posted.
Sure you have

I just took a look at the rest of your lame posts most of which are in the FAQs or could have easily been found by searching. What's going to be great is when you need some real help/info and people like me won't bother trying to help a lazy kid that doesn't know how to help himself.

Last edited by BlueRex; Apr 20, 2006 at 10:01 AM.
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 10:49 AM
  #13  
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
Insane Burning Diarrhea
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
From: Noo Yawk City / San Diego
Originally Posted by AWD-RWD racer
wow your so smart, wish i would have thought of that. ive been searching since i posted.

this is what? the 5th thread youve started? and all of them can be answered with 10 seconds of searching?....
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 10:55 AM
  #14  
afgmoto1978's Avatar
Lift Off in T-Minus...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 4
From: Kingman, AZ
I did notice a slight improvement in response and yes at 10 psi no real noticable improvement, but at 14 psi I'm about to find out in a month (or two).
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #15  
Larz's Avatar
Potato Love
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 4
From: Normal, Illinois
I thought it wasn't advised to crank up the boost that high on the 99s. I thought the consensous was 12psi max on those things. Please correct if I have a misconception.
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #16  
Herblenny's Avatar
DGRR 2017 4/26-4/30, 2017
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 13,597
Likes: 6
From: Alabama
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
this is what? the 5th thread youve started? and all of them can be answered with 10 seconds of searching?....
Amen!

Someone needs to write up about how to search this forum.. And sticky it!

Obviously this newb and most newbs I've seen don't know how to search the forum..

OR

Pre-searched topics and sticky it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
28
Apr 14, 2016 12:58 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 PM.