Single Turbo RX-7's Questions about all aspects of single turbo setups.

Pics of GT42 installed on a street only car.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 12:44 PM
  #1  
Mercury's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Pics of GT42 installed on a street only car.









Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 12:54 PM
  #2  
Mercury's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
In my attempts to find the ultimate turbo for the FD I came across the GT42 and the kit that Magnus has put together… here are the pics that he sent me. Enjoy. If you have any questions I am sure that he can answer them for you, as he seams to know his ****. You can reach Marco at the following e-mail address:
marco@magnusmotorsports.com

-----EDIT-----
I would be interested in going in on a group buy if anyone is interested pipe up…
-M

Last edited by Mercury; Sep 11, 2002 at 12:57 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 12:57 PM
  #3  
FatDave747's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA USA
That's a fat *** turbo!!! How much does something like that run for?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 01:01 PM
  #4  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
if it's a street only car there's no reason to get a turbo that big, imo. to get the most out of the boost that thing produces you'll need race gas anyway. please you'll need an overly agressive port job to get the most out of that thing. if it's a street only car you won't need nor can you handle that much hp anyway so why introduce the extra lag over the gt3540, which when tuned right can get well over 500rwhp.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 01:14 PM
  #5  
Mercury's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Well, I am still considering the GT3540, and was almost sold on it till I saw the GT42. I know it is one big ****, and will have more lag than the GT3540 but **** it seams like the road that I have in mind for it, the spare motor that I am building, are calling its name.
-M
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 01:16 PM
  #6  
Mercury's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Here is another pic that has been floating arround the forum for a while...

Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 01:38 PM
  #7  
nocab72's Avatar
03 Cobra Killer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: All Over
That thing is a monster!

K
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 01:53 PM
  #8  
RX-8's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: MD
That is the largest turbo i've ever seen on an fd!!
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 01:57 PM
  #9  
RX-8's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: MD
Instead of that big thing why don't you get the BB HKS Kai?It's larger than the gt35/40 and smaller than this gt42.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 02:21 PM
  #10  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
Originally posted by Itoen
Well, I am still considering the GT3540, and was almost sold on it till I saw the GT42. I know it is one big ****, and will have more lag than the GT3540 but **** it seams like the road that I have in mind for it, the spare motor that I am building, are calling its name.
-M
hey man, no doubt that would be a killer motor, but i think a gt3540 would still kill on any street. practically speaking a smaller turbo car could outperform you on any surface except the highway. w/ a gt42 your peak hp would probably be similar to a 3540 because w/ the quality of pump gas you just can't open it up like it needs to. the 3540 will make gobs more low end power w/ similar peak hp. i don't really see the need to make an fd a dyno queen like all the supras out there. fd's have so little low end power as it is, why would you want to make it even worse w/ a big turbo and big porting.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 02:43 PM
  #11  
Brad's Avatar
dear baby jesus...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: WA
You know...for those of you that want a lil more oooompfh than the 3540 there are 3542's and also a shop in australia that did that crazy *** **** Mario's car (1300+ whp R33) made some custom 3542's with larger compressors.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 02:44 PM
  #12  
Greg's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: The First State
god damn that turbo is big
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 02:59 PM
  #13  
allrotor93's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (126)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 3
From: Cary, NC
turbo

how do i get info on the 3542's?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 03:24 PM
  #14  
Brad's Avatar
dear baby jesus...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
From: WA
Re: turbo

Originally posted by allrotor93
how do i get info on the 3542's?
You know, I don't know exactly...haven't put too much research into it. Go here http://www.exvitermini.com

If you haven't seen the page before, be prepared to be amazed. Email that Mario dude and ask him where he got his GT3542's.

Here is a pic of a 3542 next to a Y2K !!!

Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 03:32 PM
  #15  
Turbo_F1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
From: "Forecast for tomorrow, a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!"
whats is that used for?...Actually i seen bigger...if anyone remembers the turbo issue of super street where the guys was standing next to a turbo and the other guy on top of it...it said somthing like 35,000 hp or something.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 05:45 PM
  #16  
93 R1's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,734
Likes: 0
From: maryland
Holy ****!
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 05:47 PM
  #17  
magnus's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: I AM canadian
Originally posted by fdracer


hey man, no doubt that would be a killer motor, but i think a gt3540 would still kill on any street. practically speaking a smaller turbo car could outperform you on any surface except the highway. w/ a gt42 your peak hp would probably be similar to a 3540 because w/ the quality of pump gas you just can't open it up like it needs to. the 3540 will make gobs more low end power w/ similar peak hp. i don't really see the need to make an fd a dyno queen like all the supras out there. fd's have so little low end power as it is, why would you want to make it even worse w/ a big turbo and big porting.
Sorry you are wrong, Our GT42 does not use the standard exhaust housing. the divided exhaust manifold to a divided tang exhaust housing, plus the twin ball bearing design ensures that boost response is faster than any other turbo I have used. I have tried quite a few turbo's, this is our favorite. Quick boost response with huge top end power gains.

we have dyno'd 400 at 14 psi (pump gas) 570 at 26 psi repeatable. In that iteration it ran 10.13 @ 137 mph. Our current motor is a little down on compression but has dyno'd 590 no nitrous. This is with the smaller exhaust housing. Pictured is the large housing

Paul, whose car is pictured there, could not be happier, He is running the larger exhaust housing than the one on the race car. He has moved up from a T-66 p trim with .96 A/R. His first impressions were the car feels lighter at cruising and lower rpm (due to the decrease in backpressure giving more low load torque) And it no longer stops pulling in the upper rpms, it will continue to pull forever.

Marco
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 05:59 PM
  #18  
AJC13B's Avatar
10.32 @ 133
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
The above picture from http://www.exvitermini.com is not a Y2K, its based on a Garrett TA45 turbo. The Y2Ks never came out with that sort of compressor cover.

The GT42 is far too big for a street 13B. 20B on the other hand.....
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 06:07 PM
  #19  
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,643
Likes: 0
From: l.a.
Originally posted by magnus


Sorry you are wrong, Our GT42 does not use the standard exhaust housing. the divided exhaust manifold to a divided tang exhaust housing, plus the twin ball bearing design ensures that boost response is faster than any other turbo I have used. I have tried quite a few turbo's, this is our favorite. Quick boost response with huge top end power gains.

we have dyno'd 400 at 14 psi (pump gas) 570 at 26 psi repeatable. In that iteration it ran 10.13 @ 137 mph. Our current motor is a little down on compression but has dyno'd 590 no nitrous. This is with the smaller exhaust housing. Pictured is the large housing

Paul, whose car is pictured there, could not be happier, He is running the larger exhaust housing than the one on the race car. He has moved up from a T-66 p trim with .96 A/R. His first impressions were the car feels lighter at cruising and lower rpm (due to the decrease in backpressure giving more low load torque) And it no longer stops pulling in the upper rpms, it will continue to pull forever.

Marco
how does your gt42 compare to the gt3540 in terms of spooling, marco?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 06:27 PM
  #20  
DiaperBoy's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Cost

How much does that GT42 cost?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 06:43 PM
  #21  
Kurgan's Avatar
Gaijin Racing
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
From: Normal, IL
Is the GT42 available with an undivided tangential standard sized exhaust housing? I'm looking for something like this for my 20B FC. Looking for somewhere in the .96 - 1.15 a/r, but it must be undivided. If you have any other undivided housings, I may be interested as well.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 10:11 PM
  #22  
AJC13B's Avatar
10.32 @ 133
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally posted by Kurgan
Is the GT42 available with an undivided tangential standard sized exhaust housing? I'm looking for something like this for my 20B FC. Looking for somewhere in the .96 - 1.15 a/r, but it must be undivided. If you have any other undivided housings, I may be interested as well.
Why do you want such a small exhaust housing for a 20B? Those exhaust housings would be used on a street 13B!
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 12:25 PM
  #23  
AJatx's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Marco,

How's the lag? I bet the boost response is quick with the GT42 as it may be with the GT3540. However, lag is what most folks are concerned about.

J

Another person mentioned getting a GT3542. Why a bigger compressor wheel? Why not a GT40 or a GT4042?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 01:18 PM
  #24  
Kurgan's Avatar
Gaijin Racing
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
From: Normal, IL
Originally posted by AJC13B


Why do you want such a small exhaust housing for a 20B? Those exhaust housings would be used on a street 13B!
For one, I won't be taking my engine over 8000. Secondly, they aren't small. The A/R is a ratio... a .96 on a t04 hotside is smaller than a .96 on a T-frame turbo and so on....
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 01:59 PM
  #25  
magnus's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: I AM canadian
That particular Turbo is the large exhaust housing model.

We went out for some roll on tests just now.

listen carefully:

From a roll starting at 1000 RPM in 4th gear, full boost at 3700 - 4000(14psi) 7 psi by 3000 RPM.

this is a mild street ported engine.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.