Engine Management Forum Use this area for discussing Haltech, Wolf 3D, Power FC, AEM and any other aftermarket ECU upgrades. Help/Questions/Tuning

3 rotor motor, best(easiest) ecu to use?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-02, 12:55 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 rotor motor, best(easiest) ecu to use?

Mint 3rd gen blown motor, mint 3 rotor on floor, the next step just seems to make sense. i have no ecu or harness for the 3 rotor. Anybody, done this already? Best ecu for the job and why?? Thanks

Chris
Old 12-05-02, 02:01 PM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,802
Received 2,577 Likes on 1,831 Posts
check out this thread https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=126283

mike
Old 12-16-02, 09:00 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
AJatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lots of options. I'd say the computer is a lot of the complexity of the install/tune, but the other major chore is the fitting of the engine.

Being in Canada, it may not matter as much if you don't run split timing. So, you could use a Haltech E6K for a cheap alternative with decent amount of support through Hitman.

Microtech has history of running 20B engines in street and race form.

AEM is a very flexible ECU for the bucks. I'm not sure how much support you'll get since I haven't heard of anybody running a 20B with an AEM.


J

Last edited by AJatx; 12-16-02 at 09:03 PM.
Old 12-17-02, 01:02 PM
  #4  
NYC's Loudest FD

 
RX794's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd try Electromotive, you can call them or PFSupercars about it, they have setups for it, here are the websites:

http://www.electromotive-inc.com/

http://www.pfsupercars.com/
Old 12-27-02, 10:35 AM
  #5  
Haltech Dealer

 
20B-3Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm running E6K and I haven't had any problems with it.

I herd that the E11 is a little harder to program but still one of the best system.


Or if you really want a good system and money isn't a problem try MoTeC. http://www.motec.com.au
Old 12-27-02, 06:33 PM
  #6  
Safety Guy

iTrader: (3)
 
Turbo 3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Apple Valley area in MN
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why don't you go to the 20B section of this forum and do a search. We have rehashed this subject waaay too many times already.

People are generally running Motec, TEC I or TEC 3 (what I'm using. Call Fred at Electromotive for help and/or questions), Haltech E11, Wolf 3D 4.0. Microtech and others seem to be better for WOT only and aren't very good for street use so the discussions have went.
Old 12-27-02, 10:13 PM
  #7  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally posted by Turbo 3
People are generally running Motec, TEC I or TEC 3 (what I'm using. Call Fred at Electromotive for help and/or questions), Haltech E11, Wolf 3D 4.0. Microtech and others seem to be better for WOT only and aren't very good for street use so the discussions have went.
No, just the Microtech computers have coarse fuel injector resolution (0.05 mS) which is best left to WOT drag racing or non-turbo engines. The newer Microtech computers may have fixed this, but no data has been published to my knowledge. The Haltech E11 and Wolf3D 4.0 both have fantastic 0.004 mS injector resolution, which I believe is superior to that of the TEC3.
Old 12-30-02, 02:04 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
FarNorthMotoring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alaska
Posts: 347
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
TEC3's Max Resolution for fuel injectors is .001 mS. Ignition is 1/4 deg at worst case also.

Last edited by FarNorthMotoring; 12-30-02 at 02:06 AM.
Old 01-01-03, 09:06 AM
  #9  
Dyno Guy

 
jetenginedoctor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd be interested in knowing who said the E11 is more diffucult and why.

BK
Old 01-01-03, 06:55 PM
  #10  
Haltech Dealer

 
20B-3Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't seen it but thats what haltech in Aus told me. I guess a few people have had a little trouble with it. But I am planning on getting me an e11 for my car and giving the e6k to my brother.
Old 01-01-03, 08:36 PM
  #11  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally posted by jetenginedoctor
I'd be interested in knowing who said the E11 is more diffucult and why.
I'm going to take a guess based on my experience with Wolf. It's probably due to the increased resolution and options. The old Wolf3D 3.0 was pretty simple to use with only 8 load bands and rpm points every 500 rpm = 128 points to tune per fuel or ignition map on an 8,000rpm engine. The new Wolf3D 4.0 with 16 load bands and rpm points every 125 rpm = 1024 points on the same 8,000rpm engine. That equates to 8 times the work, not including all the extra trims and other options that the newer EMS products like the Wolf3D 4.0 have now. The E11 has even more confusing and time-consuming options than the Wolf3D 4.0, so I would imagine that this is where the added difficulty comes in.

It would be nice to hear from those one or two unbiased E11 owners to see what they think of the new system.
Old 01-02-03, 12:40 PM
  #12  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,802
Received 2,577 Likes on 1,831 Posts
Originally posted by Evil Aviator

I'm going to take a guess based on my experience with Wolf. It's probably due to the increased resolution and options. The old Wolf3D 3.0 was pretty simple to use with only 8 load bands and rpm points every 500 rpm = 128 points to tune per fuel or ignition map on an 8,000rpm engine. The new Wolf3D 4.0 with 16 load bands and rpm points every 125 rpm = 1024 points on the same 8,000rpm engine. That equates to 8 times the work, not including all the extra trims and other options that the newer EMS products like the Wolf3D 4.0 have now. The E11 has even more confusing and time-consuming options than the Wolf3D 4.0, so I would imagine that this is where the added difficulty comes in.

It would be nice to hear from those one or two unbiased E11 owners to see what they think of the new system.
i was just gonna say that! dont forget you have a new interface to learn

mike
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
05-30-19 08:47 PM
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
05-27-17 04:51 AM
incubuseva
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
09-03-15 12:37 PM
Professorpeanutrx7
New Member RX-7 Technical
5
08-15-15 01:38 PM



Quick Reply: 3 rotor motor, best(easiest) ecu to use?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.