Build Threads The place to discuss complete builds

Non-turbo 428rwhp FD build up and history

Old Dec 3, 2011 | 02:00 AM
  #301  
Slobalt7's Avatar
Wrong wheel drive **D
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Hopeless Mills, NC
I want!
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2011 | 08:31 AM
  #302  
Grant M's Avatar
RX 4BPT
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Huddersfield, England
Originally Posted by GtoRx7.
Not sure just yet. I'll have our engineer run some numbers and get it matched with the flow increase I need. When I get the housings machined larger, I plan on making inserts to reduce the diameter. That way two or even three setups will be possible. Such as long track st1, and short track st1.

Full p-port can work with the setup, it would just be too much airflow when sideports are used.
How would the engine be able to cope with that amount of airflow then? Would you have to rev it beyond 10k?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 02:46 PM
  #303  
94redfd's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
nasty build
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 02:14 AM
  #304  
GtoRx7.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 850
Likes: 3
From: ohio
Originally Posted by Grant M
How would the engine be able to cope with that amount of airflow then? Would you have to rev it beyond 10k?
Yeah basically. Maybe 12,000 rpm or so. The amount of air needed at high rpm seems to be exponential. In the future I wouldnt mind shooting for power over 10k with some more internal mods to handle it.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 01:15 AM
  #305  
Grant M's Avatar
RX 4BPT
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Huddersfield, England
What would happen to the power band if your semi PPs inlet tract was really short with long your side ports inlet tract being exceptionally long?

Would this bring your torque lower whilst only on the side ports, then once the semi PPs open the torque would be shifted up further allowing power all the way up to and beyond 10,000rpm?

Or would this make it difficult to setup?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 01:33 PM
  #306  
kish-mish's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: moscow RU
proper one. Good work
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 01:59 PM
  #307  
OneRotor's Avatar
RAWR
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,860
Likes: 2
From: 90024
Congrats Logan. Looking forward to your next round of mods, and maybe seeing the car again at DGRR12 (sans 85' car hauler Dragon run?).
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 06:00 PM
  #308  
GtoRx7.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 850
Likes: 3
From: ohio
Originally Posted by Grant M
What would happen to the power band if your semi PPs inlet tract was really short with long your side ports inlet tract being exceptionally long?

Would this bring your torque lower whilst only on the side ports, then once the semi PPs open the torque would be shifted up further allowing power all the way up to and beyond 10,000rpm?

Or would this make it difficult to setup?
That was basically the very first setup. The p-ports were almost half the length of the sideports. The issue is once you build a exhaust to resonate, it will only work with one set length of intake. Double edge sword really. The latest adjustments proved to be much more powerful in both torque and hp however.

This setup as-is would continue to make effective hp past 10k, but not any higher hp.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2011 | 06:37 PM
  #309  
GtoRx7.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 850
Likes: 3
From: ohio
Got on the dyno for the final time this year. Took a risk and just did runs in 4th gear instead of 3rd. Eats up more horsepower on a car like mine because the pulls are going into the 175mph range.

Results were still pretty good. Matched hp, and gained torque and a lot more under the curve. 475rwhp and 281 rwtq. In the standard 3rd gear run it would be 481rwhp and 284 rwtq.

Tuning gave me a bunch of issues. The fuel pump seems to be maxed out (walbro 255) so it was very inconsistent. AFR's on the best pull were still 12.6's so some more was in there.

interesting results-

Race gas lost hp and tq. Not a huge amount, but it did drop power. 93 octane seems to still be the best.





Reply
Old Dec 10, 2011 | 10:07 AM
  #310  
Grant M's Avatar
RX 4BPT
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Huddersfield, England
Obviously you are using high compression rotors with the engine being NA, but if you were to change the rotors for some custom made rotors and not the standard iron rotors would an increase in compression using race gas yield better results?

Also I have been thinking about WI on a non turbod motor, obviously the same gains would not be seen like the turbo engines do but possibly some would be seen?
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2011 | 02:19 AM
  #311  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,475
Likes: 927
From: CA
From what I understand, raising the compression ratio does not always increase power on a high output NA rotary as it limits the effectiveness of ignition advance.

This is because the mixture is ignited when the trailing side of the combustion chamber is larger then the leading side (split by minor axis in rotor housing) and then all the expanding combustion gasses must pass through the slot in the rotor as the rotor turns and the leading side of the combustion chamber becomes the larger one and then finally the only side of the combustion chamber.

Raising the compression ratio makes the rotor slot smaller raising the pumping losses of the combustion chamber location transfer.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2012 | 01:18 PM
  #312  
Grant M's Avatar
RX 4BPT
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Huddersfield, England
have you come up with some more crazy idead to squeexe closer to 500HP?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 05:30 PM
  #313  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,475
Likes: 927
From: CA
Since you need a fuel pump upgrade anyways-

lets see how it does on E85!
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2012 | 04:40 AM
  #314  
GtoRx7.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 850
Likes: 3
From: ohio
Originally Posted by Grant M
have you come up with some more crazy idead to squeexe closer to 500HP?
Of course If everything goes well, it should go past 500rwhp a decent amount. We will see.

Originally Posted by BLUE TII
Since you need a fuel pump upgrade anyways-

lets see how it does on E85!
I could try it and see, going to need more injector to do that though. I doubt any more power would result but I could be wrong of course. 100 octane already lost some power...
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2012 | 11:28 AM
  #315  
rotorhausen's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Big Easy
100 octane just burns to slow i believe, you aren't moving enough air to utilize it, it seems. The e85 atomizes differently. I think e85 will yield more power.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2012 | 02:00 PM
  #316  
RCCAZ 1's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 86
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by GtoRx7.
Of course If everything goes well, it should go past 500rwhp a decent amount. We will see. ..
How soon before you're up and testing again??
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2012 | 10:50 PM
  #317  
GtoRx7.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 850
Likes: 3
From: ohio
Originally Posted by rotorhausen
100 octane just burns to slow i believe, you aren't moving enough air to utilize it, it seems. The e85 atomizes differently. I think e85 will yield more power.
Always worth a shot when every horsepower counts I will try it out at some point

Originally Posted by RCCAZ 1
How soon before you're up and testing again??
Depends, there is so much to do at the shop right now this is kinda on the back burner. Luckily there wasn't a whole lot to change on the setup. But hopefully no later than mid april
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 07:05 AM
  #318  
RCCAZ 1's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 86
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by GtoRx7.
...Depends, there is so much to do at the shop right now this is kinda on the back burner. Luckily there wasn't a whole lot to change on the setup. But hopefully no later than mid april
Cool. Can't wait to see your results. Also waiting to see what you finally cook up for Chris' Red GTUS. Great work Logan!!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 01:14 PM
  #319  
Grant M's Avatar
RX 4BPT
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Huddersfield, England
looking forward to the upgrades
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2012 | 02:41 PM
  #320  
Grant M's Avatar
RX 4BPT
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Huddersfield, England
Have you hit 500 HP yet?
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 10:54 PM
  #321  
GtoRx7.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 850
Likes: 3
From: ohio
Originally Posted by Grant M
Have you hit 500 HP yet?
I enjoy the faith everyone has in us. Not a question of "if" but rather "when" will it happen Well basically its been a super busy year. But all the new engine modifications are finished, and just need a free day or so to assemble it and replace 3rd gear in the tranny. After that its off to the dyno for results.

Very exciting to do the modifications internally I've been thinking of for so long. Will post some pics and results hopefully in the next month!
Reply
Old May 13, 2012 | 01:53 PM
  #322  
Mr Beckman's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Ca
Just wanted to chime in and say great build those numbers are pretty impressive on pump
Reply
Old May 25, 2012 | 02:07 AM
  #323  
RX-510's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Gig Harbor WA
That one bad 7
Reply
Old May 25, 2012 | 01:23 PM
  #324  
Kenku's Avatar
spoon!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 50
From: Dousman, WI
Just finished reading this start to finish again. Just as a question, do you think the semi-pp setup has more potential than a full peripheral engine? It seems like a lot of the tricks you're doing are related to runner tuning and the like, which would apply to a full peripheral as well.

Also, any thought to running less than 93 octane?
Reply
Old May 26, 2012 | 05:30 PM
  #325  
GtoRx7.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 850
Likes: 3
From: ohio
Originally Posted by Mr Beckman
Just wanted to chime in and say great build those numbers are pretty impressive on pump
Originally Posted by RX-510
That one bad 7

Thanks guys!


Originally Posted by Kenku
Just finished reading this start to finish again. Just as a question, do you think the semi-pp setup has more potential than a full peripheral engine? It seems like a lot of the tricks you're doing are related to runner tuning and the like, which would apply to a full peripheral as well.

Also, any thought to running less than 93 octane?
That is a age old question around here. So I decided to do more testing of a full p-port motor with all the tricks side by side with this one and find out Yeah years ago we tried 87, 89, 91 and 93. Lower octane used to always make more power, until the engine reached better development. Then the higher octane was a benefit.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.