Y-Pipe Turbulence
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 1
From: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Y-Pipe Turbulence
Has anyone ever thought about welding a metal plate down in the middle of the y-pipe where the two converge into one?? I saw a picture of something like that while browsing some Japanese sites. Has anyone tried this on a US y-pipe? Would there be much of a gain? I would think since both pipes are kind of angled at each other that it might clear up some turbulence down in there and keep things moving in the right direction. What do you guys think?
he was actually selling it not long ago
I've been thinking of making one also
here's a thread with all the info
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=637865
I've been thinking of making one also
here's a thread with all the info
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=637865
I've spent alot of time at the flow bench testing mods on the Y pipe. I know it defies common sense, but the stock piece is not too bad. (Including the cross-over tube.) It can be improved, but not with the divider that has been shown-- that actually hurts flow. The BOV port needs to be moved and the runners need to be reworked, in order to get maximum effect. I have also experimented with an airfoil mounted inside, a budget approach to approximating a rework, with encouraging results. This kind of mod takes a lot of time and testing to get right. Improvements in flow of 5 to 10% on the individual runners can be achieved and even more can be realized in combined output.
No, I am not going to post pics for everyone to try to do themselves. The tolerances are too critical to try and get to come out right by duplicating a photo. I might consider doing some of these for interested members, but it will not be inexpensive unless I get enough for a production run.
No, I am not going to post pics for everyone to try to do themselves. The tolerances are too critical to try and get to come out right by duplicating a photo. I might consider doing some of these for interested members, but it will not be inexpensive unless I get enough for a production run.
Trending Topics
I'd like to remove the bov from the Y, i already have a separate one and don't need it there. I'm probably going to go for an efini Y though.
Has anyone modded the efini y?
Has anyone modded the efini y?
I've spent alot of time at the flow bench testing mods on the Y pipe. I know it defies common sense, but the stock piece is not too bad. (Including the cross-over tube.) It can be improved, but not with the divider that has been shown-- that actually hurts flow. The BOV port needs to be moved and the runners need to be reworked, in order to get maximum effect. I have also experimented with an airfoil mounted inside, a budget approach to approximating a rework, with encouraging results. This kind of mod takes a lot of time and testing to get right. Improvements in flow of 5 to 10% on the individual runners can be achieved and even more can be realized in combined output.
No, I am not going to post pics for everyone to try to do themselves. The tolerances are too critical to try and get to come out right by duplicating a photo. I might consider doing some of these for interested members, but it will not be inexpensive unless I get enough for a production run.
No, I am not going to post pics for everyone to try to do themselves. The tolerances are too critical to try and get to come out right by duplicating a photo. I might consider doing some of these for interested members, but it will not be inexpensive unless I get enough for a production run.
I think for a DIYer with too much time on their hands, that polishing the inside surfaces might be more reasonable.
Dave
Basically, it's the same principle that is the reason for golf ***** having dimples.
If you think that is cool, you should ask him about the results he observed from testing the turbo manifold. His ported manifold is awesome.
Actually, polishing the inner surface would cause more turbulence. You only want a really smooth surface if the passage is practically arrow-straight. The boundary layer airflow will cling to a slightly rough surface better (and prevent turbulence) if there are any curves in the passage...of which there are plenty in the FD's complete intake tract.
Basically, it's the same principle that is the reason for golf ***** having dimples.
Basically, it's the same principle that is the reason for golf ***** having dimples.
Dave
Anytime you have a curvature in the surface features, it's more advantageous to have a turbulent boundary layer. Even just a slight curvature will cause the breakup of a laminar boundary layer.

I should have dug up the old thread prior to posing the question again.
Dave
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 1
From: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








