3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Y-Pipe Turbulence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 02:11 PM
  #1  
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Benjos Captain
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 1
From: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Y-Pipe Turbulence

Has anyone ever thought about welding a metal plate down in the middle of the y-pipe where the two converge into one?? I saw a picture of something like that while browsing some Japanese sites. Has anyone tried this on a US y-pipe? Would there be much of a gain? I would think since both pipes are kind of angled at each other that it might clear up some turbulence down in there and keep things moving in the right direction. What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #2  
AHarada's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 17
From: CA
I've seen that on this site a few times. Seems like a pretty good idea.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 02:40 PM
  #3  
scrubolio's Avatar
they don't understand
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 1
From: raleigh/durham
i think KinitekFD (i think thats his username) made one and it was a beautiful piece
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 06:51 PM
  #4  
BOTTLEFED's Avatar
Freudian slip
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: Pocatello, ID
he was actually selling it not long ago
I've been thinking of making one also

here's a thread with all the info
https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=637865
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 10:40 PM
  #5  
Speed of light's Avatar
Form follows function
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 47
From: Now in Arizona
I've spent alot of time at the flow bench testing mods on the Y pipe. I know it defies common sense, but the stock piece is not too bad. (Including the cross-over tube.) It can be improved, but not with the divider that has been shown-- that actually hurts flow. The BOV port needs to be moved and the runners need to be reworked, in order to get maximum effect. I have also experimented with an airfoil mounted inside, a budget approach to approximating a rework, with encouraging results. This kind of mod takes a lot of time and testing to get right. Improvements in flow of 5 to 10% on the individual runners can be achieved and even more can be realized in combined output.

No, I am not going to post pics for everyone to try to do themselves. The tolerances are too critical to try and get to come out right by duplicating a photo. I might consider doing some of these for interested members, but it will not be inexpensive unless I get enough for a production run.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #6  
IRPerformance's Avatar
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 11,347
Likes: 321
From: NJ
I think its a waste of time. There are other restrictions in the twin turbo system. An efini y pipe is more than enough.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 10:55 PM
  #7  
Trout2's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 15
From: New Orleans
I recall seeing some comparison dyno sheets from Japan and this mod increased output slightly in the mid-range.

Jack
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 09:20 AM
  #8  
GARCO MOTORWORKS's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 1
From: next to the polishing wheel!!!
I have removed the bov from the y pipe and reshaped it . The ones I have done it for said it made a differance they could feel .
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #9  
NissanConvert's Avatar
Please somebody help!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Woodridge, IL
I'd like to remove the bov from the Y, i already have a separate one and don't need it there. I'm probably going to go for an efini Y though.

Has anyone modded the efini y?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #10  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Originally Posted by Speed of light
I've spent alot of time at the flow bench testing mods on the Y pipe. I know it defies common sense, but the stock piece is not too bad. (Including the cross-over tube.) It can be improved, but not with the divider that has been shown-- that actually hurts flow. The BOV port needs to be moved and the runners need to be reworked, in order to get maximum effect. I have also experimented with an airfoil mounted inside, a budget approach to approximating a rework, with encouraging results. This kind of mod takes a lot of time and testing to get right. Improvements in flow of 5 to 10% on the individual runners can be achieved and even more can be realized in combined output.

No, I am not going to post pics for everyone to try to do themselves. The tolerances are too critical to try and get to come out right by duplicating a photo. I might consider doing some of these for interested members, but it will not be inexpensive unless I get enough for a production run.
Wow. Do you polish the inside passages of the y-pipe?

I think for a DIYer with too much time on their hands, that polishing the inside surfaces might be more reasonable.

Dave
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 03:58 PM
  #11  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
Wow. Do you polish the inside passages of the y-pipe?

I think for a DIYer with too much time on their hands, that polishing the inside surfaces might be more reasonable.

Dave
Actually, polishing the inner surface would cause more turbulence. You only want a really smooth surface if the passage is practically arrow-straight. The boundary layer airflow will cling to a slightly rough surface better (and prevent turbulence) if there are any curves in the passage...of which there are plenty in the FD's complete intake tract.

Basically, it's the same principle that is the reason for golf ***** having dimples.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #12  
gracer7-rx7's Avatar
needs more track time
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,766
Likes: 794
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
Wow. Do you polish the inside passages of the y-pipe?

I think for a DIYer with too much time on their hands, that polishing the inside surfaces might be more reasonable.

Dave
If you think that is cool, you should ask him about the results he observed from testing the turbo manifold. His ported manifold is awesome.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:10 PM
  #13  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Originally Posted by Kento
Actually, polishing the inner surface would cause more turbulence. You only want a really smooth surface if the passage is practically arrow-straight. The boundary layer airflow will cling to a slightly rough surface better (and prevent turbulence) if there are any curves in the passage...of which there are plenty in the FD's complete intake tract.

Basically, it's the same principle that is the reason for golf ***** having dimples.
I know this has been covered before, I but I couldn't recall offhand if turbulence was desired (as is the case in golf *****) at this point in the intake, or polishing to delay the onset of a turbulent boundary layer was more desirable.

Dave
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 08:02 PM
  #14  
GARCO MOTORWORKS's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 1
From: next to the polishing wheel!!!
I have modified the Efini Y pipe as well, removed the bov pipe and reshaped the area .
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 08:23 PM
  #15  
Kento's Avatar
2/4 wheel cornering fiend
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, CA
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
I know this has been covered before, I but I couldn't recall offhand if turbulence was desired (as is the case in golf *****) at this point in the intake, or polishing to delay the onset of a turbulent boundary layer was more desirable.

Dave
Anytime you have a curvature in the surface features, it's more advantageous to have a turbulent boundary layer. Even just a slight curvature will cause the breakup of a laminar boundary layer.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #16  
Sgtblue's Avatar
Urban Combat Vet
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 983
From: Mid-west
Originally Posted by Kento
Anytime you have a curvature in the surface features, it's more advantageous to have a turbulent boundary layer. Even just a slight curvature will cause the breakup of a laminar boundary layer.
LOL, I just scared myself.....I think I actually understood what you just said.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:01 PM
  #17  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Originally Posted by Kento
Anytime you have a curvature in the surface features, it's more advantageous to have a turbulent boundary layer. Even just a slight curvature will cause the breakup of a laminar boundary layer.
Ah, yes, it's all coming back to me now.

I should have dug up the old thread prior to posing the question again.

Dave
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:42 PM
  #18  
MADDSLOW's Avatar
17 second FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 1
From: Poughkeepsie, New York
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
Ah, yes, it's all coming back to me now.

I should have dug up the old thread prior to posing the question again.

Dave
https://www.rx7club.com/3rd-generation-specific-1993-2002-16/polished-intake-manifolds-very-bad-554531/
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 01:03 AM
  #19  
AHarada's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 17
From: CA
Originally Posted by gracer7-rx7
If you think that is cool, you should ask him about the results he observed from testing the turbo manifold. His ported manifold is awesome.
Please elaborate, or give us a link if you could. Or if Speed of Light could chime in, I'm very interested in the topic.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 01:44 AM
  #20  
XxMerlinxX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Benjos Captain
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 1
From: Greenwood/Hartsville, SC.
Originally Posted by AHarada
Please elaborate, or give us a link if you could. Or if Speed of Light could chime in, I'm very interested in the topic.
+1 I was going to just PM him but I bet a lot of us are interested in the subject.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 08:09 AM
  #21  
tiger18's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: UK
Interesting,,,shed some light
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 08:37 AM
  #22  
dubulup's Avatar
development
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,714
Likes: 7
From: Lafayette, LA
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
I think its a waste of time. There are other restrictions in the twin turbo system. An efini y pipe is more than enough.
my thoughts exactly
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bauer778
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
10
Nov 4, 2015 04:42 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.