3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Why do my Non-Sequental twins spool like a T-88? :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 22, 2006 | 05:57 PM
  #26  
jpandes's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
From: San Francisco, CA
I wish I could remember how to convert back to sequential. (And if I wasn't so damn lazy) I'd convert back to sequential. Maybe someday. The lag only really bothers me when I'm tooling around town and I'm in second gear when the rpms are low. I can't shift back into first, so I just have to wait for the rpms and the boost to build, other than that NS is just fine.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 07:15 PM
  #27  
pianoprodigy's Avatar
Missin' my FD
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, FL (Tampa Bay Area)
Yeah, the first time I rode in a non-sequential car I couldn't believe how laggy it felt. I'm sure my T66 is better.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 07:19 PM
  #28  
FLA94FD's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Clearwater, FL
What gear are you in? In 1st I only make 14lb at 5000 or higher. In 4th I can make 14 by 2500, seq 99' spec. My compression was just check today and is 140ish or 10.0 and 9.7 on reused housing.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #29  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Damn chuck, that is some great low rpm boost response. I have been thinking of setting up the BNRs in sequential form, i just wonder how top end power i will lose.

I plan to go back to the dyno with the current setup and see if the turbos will put down 450, I am sure that the custom rear turbo inlet pipe I got from you will help
But you have to remember I am a fanatic and since I did the non-seq conversion myself, every mod that would help exhaust and intake flow was done on all the exhaust and intake pieces by me.

That was before I got my air compressor, and had to use a little Dremel. Spent two days grinding away!

Non-seq will not hurt top end, it will only affect low end. At 15psi boost, the low end will still outperform the strock seq low-end.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 09:30 PM
  #30  
cewrx7r1's Avatar
Eye In The Sky
Tenured Member: 25 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,941
Likes: 133
From: In A Disfunctional World
Originally Posted by internal comsucktion engi
well im not going to sit here and bad mouth someone like judge ITO (especially

because hes on the forum) but.... i will say ive been working on rotaries for a long

time now and have seen a few of the judges motors.... and yes he is a good RACE

ENGINE builder! his motors have NO longevity, the ports are too big and yes they

commonly hang side seals because of it period! and dont get me started on the

way that he runs his business.... i guess to each his on but i would NOT recommend

his motors to anyone at least not for street use! (IMHO)

~Jonathan
The same thing happend to a friends new Ito engine last summer, while being broken in, it dropped a side seal.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
Oct 17, 2020 03:25 PM
eplusz
General Rotary Tech Support
15
Oct 7, 2015 04:04 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.