3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Why Boost Spikes if....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-08, 05:23 PM
  #1  
Lives on the Forum

Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Why Boost Spikes if....

I remember reading somewhere that boost spikes if you hook up your boost controller (Profec Spec 2 in this case) before the intercooler instead of on the UIM.

Recently, there was a case of boost spiking and I couldn't figure it out thinking it was tune related but eventually got it to stop by setting the GAIN to 0 and GAIN% to 5% (the lowest it will go). After some thinking I remembered reading about the spiking if the controller is hooked up pre-intercooler and asked the person if they had their boost controller hooked up this way and they said yes.

Can someone explain why you would get massive spiking with the boost controller connected before the intercooler instead of on the UIM? Or if someone knows where its stated link to it. Thanks.

thewird
Old 10-08-08, 05:47 PM
  #2  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (14)
 
moconnor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,660
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
I've never heard of anyone measuring boost pressure pre-intercooler. Such measurements will be completely inaccurate because of the pressure loss of the intercooler - which will vary by rpm and boost - so will not reflect manifold pressure.

The signal the boost controller is working from will be different from manifold pressure so anything is possible. In any case, it is a bad idea.

Last edited by moconnor; 10-08-08 at 05:50 PM.
Old 10-08-08, 08:13 PM
  #3  
Lives on the Forum

Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Anyone else? I'm really interested in why it does it. Understandable that the pressures are different but why does the spike only happen during spoolup and then seems fine afterwards?

thewird
Old 10-08-08, 09:38 PM
  #4  
RX-7 Bad Ass

iTrader: (55)
 
DaleClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 15,399
Received 2,438 Likes on 1,509 Posts
In general, with boost controllers, you want a boost reference that's as high and pure as possible. Using the nipple right off the turbo compressor outlet is best - you are measuring the real output of the turbo itself.

Measuring boost after the intercooler, or at the intake manifold, will show a lower amount of pressure due to the pressure drop through the IC, pipes, throttle body, etc.

The wastegate opens via a pressure source. If the wastegate (like the stock wastegate) is full open at 7 psi, and you have 7 psi at the turbo's outlet, there you go. If at the intake manifold at that same time you have 5 psi, you'll be holding the wastegate partially closed, creating more boost, and potentially making a spike.

Using the intake manifold as a reference is a trick that works on some cars to increase spool time or increase boost. IMHO, it's not necessary on an FD.

I'd have to know a lot more about the car to answer the problem of the spike, but that covers the theory of the matter.

Dale
Old 10-08-08, 09:59 PM
  #5  
Lives on the Forum

Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
So having it connected at the turbo is the correct way of doing it? How come the boost controller manual shows to connect it just before the engine after the intercooler?

thewird
Old 10-08-08, 11:04 PM
  #6  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
I like to source the boost from the compressor. That seems to provide the fastest response. That being said, the spec 2 is a piece of crap in my opinion. It doesn't usually work well with fast spooling turbos.
Old 10-08-08, 11:32 PM
  #7  
T3DoW

iTrader: (10)
 
TpCpLaYa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago - NW Burbs
Posts: 3,755
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
I like to source the boost from the compressor. That seems to provide the fastest response. That being said, the spec 2 is a piece of crap in my opinion. It doesn't usually work well with fast spooling turbos.
what do u recommend?
Old 10-09-08, 10:13 AM
  #8  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
If you are on a budget, the Spec S works decent or aem true boost.Mid range would be something like the Blitz dsbc r. If your budget allows the sbc-id or greddy e-01. The spec 2 just doesn't seem to be consistent. I was disappointed because it looked so much better then the old profec b.

Last edited by IRPerformance; 10-09-08 at 10:19 AM.
Old 10-09-08, 10:37 AM
  #9  
Urban Combat Vet

iTrader: (16)
 
Sgtblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mid-west
Posts: 12,023
Received 866 Likes on 615 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
If you are on a budget, the Spec S works decent or aem true boost......The spec 2 just doesn't seem to be consistent. I was disappointed because it looked so much better then the old profec b.
I don't have either...currently. But from what I gathered, the 'S' is essentially the same controller, but with fewer fine tuning abilities. No?
Old 10-09-08, 01:09 PM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 6,591
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Hmm, I didn't think it could be a limitation on the Spec 2 since it always seemed to work fine in my car and I could properly adjust the GAIN settings for best response.

The turbo was a GT35R so yes it spools quick, maybe that is the reason. The Spec 2 just isn't quick enough to the fast spooling of the turbo?

I'm also getting a 500R-SP soon so maybe I'll get into this problem on my car as well so I might need a new boost controller too.

On another note would he "Blitz Dual Spec R Boost Controller" be the same as the "Blitz SBC-ID Boost Controller" minus the bling? I really like the small formfactor of the Spec2 and how you can mount it above the steering wheel (next to my PLX m-300 wideband). I'm assuming they will perform the same.

thewird
Old 10-13-08, 08:58 AM
  #11  
Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
IRPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 11,347
Received 317 Likes on 190 Posts
I played with one in my personal car for over a month and no matter what I did it would be very inconsistent. For example, I'd get on boost once and get 15 psi, then again and get 17, then again and get 14, and so forth. This was all back to back. I have also had similar results with this controller is customers' cars. Honestly, the old Profec B worked better than the newer renditions, but its outdated and will look right at home next to an atari. Granted I had one of the first ones in the US, but I have never had good results with it. The Blitz is a much better boost controller in my experiences. The ID has a few more features and a better learning mode, but the Spec R works great as is. The 500R will spool slower than a 35R but have more power potential and hit harder.

Last edited by IRPerformance; 10-13-08 at 09:02 AM.
Old 12-10-10, 04:30 AM
  #12  
Full Member
 
fd3s400438's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greece
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no boost

ok check this out . I have a 96 Fd , engine ported , 8:1 compression , apex seels ceramic 3mm etc . So it is a fairly strong engine

Apexi ECU , HKS T04E turbo kit with monifold and HKS wastegate , massive blitz intercooler , 76mm exhaust with no CUT , big injectors

Anyway the list is massive

I believe the HKS T04E is a small turbo with 0.64AR compressor , 0.84 AR exhaust

I think HKS will rate this at 400BHP max at the wheels

I am using my second , brand new Greedy profec spec 2 because I thought the first one was not working fine

Guess what , the second is not working either

My target is 1.3-1.35 bar or boost . Up to 1.1 all is fine

But no matter what settngs I use all I get is a boost spike - overboost call it what ever you want that goes all the way up to 1.45 and then it drops straight away down to 1.1

So I cannot see , ever constant -steady boost more than 1.1

I have tried to set the GAIN from 10% up to 35% , the set gain from 0.5bar up to 1.05 bar and the boost % ( first reading ) from 50-75%

All I get is a massive overboost which drops-dies straight away to just over 1 bar

WHY can I not see a steady boost more than 1 bar

Do you recon my Turbo is too small for 1.35 bar? I have a 0.6bar HKS spring. Do you think a 1 bar spring would be better?

I am lost
Old 12-10-10, 07:24 AM
  #13  
Turbo Lover

iTrader: (6)
 
Ball joint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm running non-sequential twins and my Spec-2 is hooked up before the turbo. The boost controller has always held a rock solid 14psi and I've ran the controller for over 4 years. Maybe this is more of an issue with users configuring the controller to control an external gate. I've hooked up spec-2's on a few FD's and have never had a problem with the controller on stock twins.
Old 12-10-10, 07:41 AM
  #14  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
What is the boost with the controller off?
Old 12-10-10, 08:42 AM
  #15  
Full Member
 
fd3s400438's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greece
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with the control off I get 0.9 bar. The original spring was 0.6 but has been stiffened to 0.9

I just came back from a test run. I got up to 70% boost , gain 6% , set gain 0.8 bar and it is still hitting almost 1.4 bar and dropping down to 1.1

Something else I noticed. When I am cruising along say in 3rd , 3K rpm and I floor it I get 1.4 overboost and the cars feels like taking off towards the moon

If I do a standing quorter mile and change all gears properly I only see 1.2 dropping straight to 1.05 with NO overboost and the car feels slower both to me and also feels slower revving as well

God I am so confused
Old 12-10-10, 08:52 AM
  #16  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
set gain is too high. try dropping it to .4 or .5
Old 12-10-10, 09:37 AM
  #17  
Just Call Me Terminator!

iTrader: (4)
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i also second the motion that i do not like the spec s. it's way too intensive to "tune" it properly.
Old 12-10-10, 09:59 AM
  #18  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
no_more_rice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Use a Hallman manual boost controller with cockpit mounted adjuster. Rock solid boost control, no electronic bullshit. Keep it simple with these cars and they won't blow up.
Old 12-10-10, 10:00 AM
  #19  
r074r'/ |\|00B

iTrader: (14)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: KC, KS
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have not added an EBC to my FD yet, but I had a Profec B spec 2 on my (neon) SRT-4 when I had the stock turbo as well as when I upgraded to a 50 trim. The stock turbo on the srt-4 was small, TD04LR-16Gk, so it spooled pretty quickly. I was able to tune both turbo's with the spec II with very little spiking, if any. I had the controller sourced directly from the compresssor. There were a lot of people in the srt-4 community using the spec 2, so I'm surprised to hear of the difficulty with the FD.
Old 12-10-10, 10:43 AM
  #20  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
the only thing wrong with the Spec II is the confusing instructions. Everything else about it is the same as the other boost controllers of its type (HKS EVC-S, TurboSmart e-boost, AEM Tru Boost, etc).

if anything, the problem with the Spec II and all these external electronic controllers is that they're not complicated enough. There aren't enough settings to compensate for changes in the weather and engine conditions. If you look at how modern boost control systems are engineered from the OEM's, they are optimized to make the engine run as consistently as possible.
Old 12-10-10, 10:46 AM
  #21  
Full Member
 
fd3s400438's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Greece
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VOSKO are you refering to my post with your comment :

i also second the motion that i do not like the spec s. it's way too intensive to "tune" it properly.

If yes what do you mean??
Old 12-10-10, 10:49 AM
  #22  
rotorhead

iTrader: (3)
 
arghx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: cold
Posts: 16,182
Received 429 Likes on 263 Posts
^ I think he confused the Spec S and the Spec II. The Profec-S is the one with the *****. The Spec II is the one that everybody complains about.
Old 12-10-10, 12:12 PM
  #23  
dorito powered

iTrader: (5)
 
KKMpunkrock2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
saw your post in the other thread, what size wastegate?
Old 12-10-10, 12:24 PM
  #24  
Just Call Me Terminator!

iTrader: (4)
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry i meant Spec 2 not Spec S. oops
Old 12-10-10, 01:56 PM
  #25  
GorillaRaceEngineering.co

iTrader: (1)
 
Gorilla RE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,048
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotary Experiment Seven
I like to source the boost from the compressor. That seems to provide the fastest response. That being said, the spec 2 is a piece of crap in my opinion. It doesn't usually work well with fast spooling turbos.
True and true.

-J


Quick Reply: Why Boost Spikes if....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.