who has the highest WPH on stock motor & stock turbos ?
11-09-02, 03:40 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Qatar
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
who has the highest WPH on stock motor & stock turbos ?
what whp are you guys making?
my best was 360whp and 309 lbft with 15 psi on a pettit ECU.
mods listed on sign
my best was 360whp and 309 lbft with 15 psi on a pettit ECU.
mods listed on sign
11-09-02, 08:43 AM
#2
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lakewood, NJ
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn thats good! I got 331RWHP and 284 TQ with original motor and turbos at 40K miles. Boost was around 14.5lbs.
Performance Mods are:
M2 intake
M2 large IC
Pettit ECU
UR pulley kit
9.5lb flywheel
DP
Greddy SP
Performance Mods are:
M2 intake
M2 large IC
Pettit ECU
UR pulley kit
9.5lb flywheel
DP
Greddy SP
11-09-02, 10:09 AM
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,835
Received 2,603 Likes
on
1,847 Posts
my friend made 387rwhp
power fc/ big pump/1300cc secondary
ported engine
dp/mp/n1dual
m2 intake/ m2 med ic
17psi stock turbos
the current setup is the same except:
modded stock airbox
greddy stock mount
it did 375rwhp@17psi
mike
power fc/ big pump/1300cc secondary
ported engine
dp/mp/n1dual
m2 intake/ m2 med ic
17psi stock turbos
the current setup is the same except:
modded stock airbox
greddy stock mount
it did 375rwhp@17psi
mike
11-09-02, 02:28 PM
#6
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally posted by striker
17psi???? isn't that getting out of the efficieny range of the stocks??? i thought stockers were safe to run to about 15psi?
17psi???? isn't that getting out of the efficieny range of the stocks??? i thought stockers were safe to run to about 15psi?
) but only run 13-14psi on the street and strip. My little guys have 92,600 miles on them and I want 'em to last just a bit longer 
.
Trending Topics
11-09-02, 03:46 PM
#8
Super Snuggles
Originally posted by GsrSol
Am I the only one that's skeptical about zooq's mods vs power? That seems extremly high for the mods you have.
Am I the only one that's skeptical about zooq's mods vs power? That seems extremly high for the mods you have.
Perfectly round numbers (360 RWHP) are always suspicious, in my opinion. When someone tells me they put down 355.4 RWHP (like my Z06, for example), I have a better feeling that they've probably seen that number on a dyno and not on someone's web page...
Last edited by jimlab; 11-09-02 at 03:48 PM.
11-09-02, 05:35 PM
#11
I,m have 320 rwhp now with with PFC running 12 1bs with Dp/Mp/Greddy Sp,Walbro pump and Intake, 26k on a Mazda reman.
I have a freaky motor that will run with guys in the mid to high 300,s so we hav not ruled out a port of some sort.Ran a 12.7 at 109.7 on streets a few weeks back.
IC/Injectors/Radiator are next and 15 lbs of course,without hyjacking this thread anyone care to share what they did next and what power gains they got? thanks.
I have a freaky motor that will run with guys in the mid to high 300,s so we hav not ruled out a port of some sort.Ran a 12.7 at 109.7 on streets a few weeks back.
IC/Injectors/Radiator are next and 15 lbs of course,without hyjacking this thread anyone care to share what they did next and what power gains they got? thanks.
11-09-02, 07:01 PM
#12
Original Gangster/Rotary!
iTrader: (213)
Originally posted by streetdreamzny
are these numbers good for stock turbos and engine, seems alot lower than the rest of you guys 314.5 rwhp and 276.9 torque at 14 lbs mods: dp, cb, intake, y-pipe, power fc, 1300cc injectors, greddy fmic, fuel pump
are these numbers good for stock turbos and engine, seems alot lower than the rest of you guys 314.5 rwhp and 276.9 torque at 14 lbs mods: dp, cb, intake, y-pipe, power fc, 1300cc injectors, greddy fmic, fuel pump
11-09-02, 07:23 PM
#13
Just Call Me Terminator!
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by streetdreamzny
are these numbers good for stock turbos and engine, seems alot lower than the rest of you guys 314.5 rwhp and 276.9 torque at 14 lbs mods: dp, cb, intake, y-pipe, power fc, 1300cc injectors, greddy fmic, fuel pump
are these numbers good for stock turbos and engine, seems alot lower than the rest of you guys 314.5 rwhp and 276.9 torque at 14 lbs mods: dp, cb, intake, y-pipe, power fc, 1300cc injectors, greddy fmic, fuel pump
11-10-02, 12:19 AM
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Qatar
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jimlab
He might just be quoting what Pettit claims for the mods that he has... it wouldn't be the first time that has happened.
Perfectly round numbers (360 RWHP) are always suspicious, in my opinion. When someone tells me they put down 355.4 RWHP (like my Z06, for example), I have a better feeling that they've probably seen that number on a dyno and not on someone's web page...
He might just be quoting what Pettit claims for the mods that he has... it wouldn't be the first time that has happened.
Perfectly round numbers (360 RWHP) are always suspicious, in my opinion. When someone tells me they put down 355.4 RWHP (like my Z06, for example), I have a better feeling that they've probably seen that number on a dyno and not on someone's web page...
11-10-02, 02:45 AM
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Qatar
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW, GsrSol
if your car or any of your friends have close whp to my car, i'd love to race them. i might go to Arlington next weekend.
i might also dyno my car at Alamo Motorsport and you can watch.
if your car or any of your friends have close whp to my car, i'd love to race them. i might go to Arlington next weekend.
i might also dyno my car at Alamo Motorsport and you can watch.
11-10-02, 06:18 AM
#16
Way back I did 355 rwhp and change at 14/15 psi on a Dynojet Dyno, my dyno curve was up on the Houston Rx7Club site for years. Pettit ECU, stock motor/turbos, all the bolt-ons. I belive there was quite a bit more hp available as the car was running rich with stock 9's for plugs. With a PFC/Haltech/?, fresh stock motor, race plugs, and more injector I expect 380-390 rwhp would be feasible at that boost. Race gas may net a bit more as would turning up the boost. I know of folks running the stock turbos up to 19, hot as **** air but for the occasional romp on the street it makes power.
11-10-02, 01:08 PM
#18
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 3,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Yup. I don't even run that high.....I put down 368 at 15 psi (but on a ported motor, so it doesn't count of course Jim ) but only run 13-14psi on the street and strip. My little guys have 92,600 miles on them and I want 'em to last just a bit longer .
Yup. I don't even run that high.....I put down 368 at 15 psi (but on a ported motor, so it doesn't count of course Jim
) but only run 13-14psi on the street and strip. My little guys have 92,600 miles on them and I want 'em to last just a bit longer .
No smoke, no oil leakage.
315 rwhp/265 tq @ 12 psi.
11-10-02, 02:12 PM
#19
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Union, NJ
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock motor(50K) and stock turbos (non-seq)
@ 15.5psi dropping down to ~14psi I ran 11.81 @119.8mph and car weights in w/me @2950 lbs......
that's has to be in the high 300's whp
Will dyno the car soon and let you know...
@ 15.5psi dropping down to ~14psi I ran 11.81 @119.8mph and car weights in w/me @2950 lbs......
that's has to be in the high 300's whp
Will dyno the car soon and let you know...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
