3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

What's the fastest you've had your FD??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-03, 03:51 AM
  #176  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Chronos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Z rating is an old rating system that means 149+ because they figured no one would ever go 150 and beyond. They are good for much higher than 149mph.

Also, I want to know what's the deal with this speedo inaccuracy thing...anyone???
Old 07-01-03, 10:00 AM
  #177  
Full Member

 
jons3rdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: indiana
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was taking a friend home one night and he kept telling me how fast his old trans am was and he told me to see how fast we could go. I got up to 140 mph and said what the hell and hit 160 mph and he started to beg me to slow down. I still had more to go but backed off.
Old 07-01-03, 11:56 AM
  #178  
Sensory Experience

 
Shinobi-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MD
Posts: 840
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Tanabe should i be scared going over 150mph without a wing?
You should be scared going 150mph anyway, LOL. You'd probably get their quicker, but not as stable without the spoiler. The drag created by the spoiler would hinder you- more power would take care of this however. Either way, I'd rather have a stable car at speeds, and sacrifice a few mph, rather than the latter.

would a rear diffuser, rear spoiler, aftermarket front bumper and vented hood (i.e. mazdaspeed) make a noticable difference 150mph+?
I read that the effects of a rear diffusor are minimal on street cars- because of our ride height- but they do add to downforce without the aero drag a spoiler creates. A flat underbelly like Ferraris have, w/ a diffusor and lower car would serve you better. As for the hood, I've seen videos where air gathers under it, causing the front of the car to raise some- a vented hood would assist in eliminating this problem.
Old 07-01-03, 10:08 PM
  #179  
Belligerent 4 Life

 
Tanabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cool thanks Shinobi-X
Old 07-01-03, 10:19 PM
  #180  
Stabbed by a pen

iTrader: (1)
 
oneflytrini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tamarac, Florida
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
155mph and lost my driver's side headlight cover in the process..........racing one of the newer M3's

the 7 came out victorious
Old 07-02-03, 04:54 PM
  #181  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Chronos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder how the V-MIC and the Panspeed huge vented hood would fair at 180mph...
Old 07-02-03, 05:55 PM
  #182  
Full Member

 
Drifter93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dyess AFB/ Abilene,TX
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
165mph.
Old 07-02-03, 05:59 PM
  #183  
no

 
suganuma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas, TX / Tokyo, Japan currently
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
170 with a weak motor and it was still pulling hard....that was back when i was running non-sequential stock twins

i started to think too hard about it and convinced myself that at any moment some sort of rabbit/armadillo/possum was going to pop out in the middle of that 2 lane TX road and cause me to go out of control and die.......so i slowed down
Old 07-02-03, 08:53 PM
  #184  
GEB
Full Member

 
GEB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
156 indicated.....146(4th gr redline)too many times....I get a little tight arsed about shifting over 120......4th gear is about it for spontaneous street racing. The 156 was an open stretch of road which ran out very quickly, however, I lost my nerve quicker than the road ran out tarmac......got a kid, wife, bills to pay can't do that ****.
Was still pulling at 156....good to know if I ever need it - not.

GEB.
Old 07-03-03, 05:12 AM
  #185  
Senior Member

 
skim41's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: netherlands
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
175 Mph, on stock twins and motor.

In Germany It was running 7500 RPM. Calculated that with 8000 RPM you would be hitting 187.5 not calculating drag etc and inefficiency.

Only thing is that at these speeds your bonnet is moving.
Old 07-03-03, 10:34 AM
  #186  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Chronos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is up with all this talk about speedo inefficiency??? What causes this? Is there any way to calibrate it? Also, how does the bonnet move around?
Old 07-03-03, 04:39 PM
  #187  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hit 160 the other night but my suspension scares me at that speed so I slowed to a stop with hit 180-200 hopefully when I get my single on her. they are right though 140 and up everything gets real scary at those speed.
Old 07-04-03, 12:45 AM
  #188  
Full Member

 
GT-X FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tejas
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
155mph in my turbo II, it would of hit 160, i just got a little scared.
Old 07-05-03, 11:02 PM
  #189  
Senior Member

 
David Beale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The speedometer (on my car, anyway) reading is off up to around 8 km/hr (5 MPH) both higher and lower up to about 120 kph (75 MPH for those ignorant of metric). It gets worse at higher speeds. Its' accuracy varies both plus and minus according to how fast you are going. As for how fast I've had mine I plea the fifth (in American lingo). I do know that an indicated 200 km/hr is actually 187 km/hr (that's about 145 MPH) in my car - my GPS (Garmin GPS III+) is accurate to 0.1 knot - better than 0.5 mph. That is what I used to determine the accuracy of the speedometer. At an indicated 200 km/hr the car is stable as though you were driving at 100 km/hr (62 mph) and when the accellerator is depressed, the car accellerates hard, firmly pressing the driver into the seat. Fortunately, as the driver gets older, he/she also develops a better appreciation of how painful (or dead) one can become at these kinds of speeds, if anything goes wrong, particularly without a roll cage and 5/6 point harness. The driver then quickly slows back down to speeds closer to legal ones ;-).
Old 07-06-03, 12:46 AM
  #190  
Senior Member

 
tomaszjc7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lemont, Il
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
140mph and still pulling strong, i was shooting for 160... and then i heard an apex seal go through my engine, oops.
Old 07-06-03, 03:13 AM
  #191  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Chronos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn! I wanna know what causes this inconsistancy in the speedo and how we can remedy it!
Old 07-06-03, 11:49 AM
  #192  
Senior Member

 
David Beale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The inaccuracy in the speedometer is just caused by the cheap "automotive" instruments. The speedometer is just a poor quality analogue current meter, driven by pulses of current. All cars I've had my GPS in are pretty much as bad. Usually they are consistently above or below. My RX-7 is both, but not as much error as some cars. You could add a good quality meter and tap into the speedo output, and then calabrate your new meter. I suspect the input to the meter is quite accurate (not a cable, rather just pulses). You could even do a digital meter (like the RX-8), but it would take some circuitry to convert the pulse rate to an appropriate number. The easiest fix is just to get a GPS and make a calibration chart (affixed to the side of the pod like aircraft do - cool factor?). Or you could just leave the GPS in the car, like I do, and rely on it. Great for setting the cruise right at the limit (it's amazing how many drivers think I'm speeding when I do this - most car speedos are set to read a bit high to keep their operators legal).
Old 07-06-03, 01:55 PM
  #193  
that's JDM tyte yo!

 
dubcaps's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
110 but it was at the strip, (i stayed on the gas a little bit past the finish line) otherwise the fastest is 80 on I 95 flowing with traffic
-stephen
Old 07-07-03, 02:26 PM
  #194  
Belligerent 4 Life

 
Tanabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok lets say i'm hauling *** like around 150mph+ and i want to slow down. do i:

a) gently apply the brakes.
b) release the accelerator pedal until i've reached an x mph, then apply the brakes.
c) firmly apply brakes and risk accident and death.

given that i have stock brakes, pads, wheels and z rated tires.
Old 07-07-03, 02:34 PM
  #195  
Waiting for the RX-9

 
tmiked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
b) as long as you can, then a)
Old 07-07-03, 02:42 PM
  #196  
Belligerent 4 Life

 
Tanabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what would be the x mph that i can safely use the brakes?
Old 07-07-03, 03:18 PM
  #197  
Lives on the Forum

 
rynberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Lorenzo, California
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
You can get on the brakes full down from 150 mph, people do it at the race track all the time....

Just don't jerkily close the throttle and jam on the brakes....just smoothly release the gas and smoothly apply the brakes.

Dubcaps: Live a little man, this car's hardly getting going by 80 mph.....
Old 07-07-03, 03:31 PM
  #198  
Junior Member

 
rsjetjock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FD Top Speed

I've had my FD to 165mph before I had to back off before I ran out of straight road.
It was still pulling. I believe with enough road I can hit 180mph easy.
Old 07-07-03, 06:17 PM
  #199  
don't race, don't need to

 
spurvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm finding the front end to get unreasonably twichy in my stock touring over 120 mph. For those of you who've transplanted the R1 lip, doest this mitigate the air buildup under the front end significantly, or just look real nice?

Girlfriend just looks over at me and smiles and says, "THAT'S why you bought it, right?" Good woman...
Old 07-10-03, 05:04 AM
  #200  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Chronos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
120mph...that's why you bought the FD?! Come on man, I do 110 in my beater...You bought that thing to do 150-160mph!!

In regards to the twitchy front end, I don't remember having that problem in my car at 140mph without the front lip spoiler, but my car is lowered to about 4" off the deck so maybe that has something to do with it. Anyone else wanna comment regarding the performance of the R1 front lip spoiler, I'm also anxious to know.


Quick Reply: What's the fastest you've had your FD??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.