What PSI should the Rad' and filler neck caps be?
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
What PSI should the Rad' and filler neck caps be?
What PSI cap is supposed to be stock on the filler neck? The repair manual refers to the AST cap as the radiator cap. So is the filler neck cap supposed to be "no" pressure and the AST cap 14-16lbs or visa-versa?
Does anyone have orginal OEM caps? ...if so, what PSI are they? Could too much pressure burst the coolant lines?
Does anyone have orginal OEM caps? ...if so, what PSI are they? Could too much pressure burst the coolant lines?
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
Which one is supposed to be 13psi? ...there are two.
Are both of them supposed to be the same?
My friends AST cap is .9bar (13psi) but he also has a .9bat filler neck cap. Is the filler neck cap supposed to be 0 psi?
Oh my Blitz is 18.5psi, which I was running before the overheating issues.
Are both of them supposed to be the same?
My friends AST cap is .9bar (13psi) but he also has a .9bat filler neck cap. Is the filler neck cap supposed to be 0 psi?
Oh my Blitz is 18.5psi, which I was running before the overheating issues.
yep both. seach for more answers.
try going to http://www.robrobinette.com/ or http://www.scuderiaciriani.com/rx7/ for more in depth explantion
try going to http://www.robrobinette.com/ or http://www.scuderiaciriani.com/rx7/ for more in depth explantion
Trending Topics
Originally posted by rynberg
My stock oem filler neck cap is 0.9 bar (13 psi).
My stock oem filler neck cap is 0.9 bar (13 psi).
no one has really addressed the original question: will the use of a 16 psi cap (as opposed to a 13 psi) create too much pressure? could the lines burst if it got up to temp? I have the pettit ast which came with a 13psi cap, but it went bad and I replaced it with a 16psi due to availability.
More pressure in your coolant system will, of course, increase the chance of a burst hose. The car (93 at least) originally came with a 1.3 bar cap. Part of the coolant recall put a lower pressure cap on the car for the very reason that you mention; burst hoses.
Mazda claimed the burst coolant hoses were causing engine fires.
A higher pressure cap will allow higher coolant temperatures before the coolant boils, which is a good thing. As with everything, there are trade offs.
My car has a 0.9 bar cap on the AST, and the coolant filler neck cap is not marked. I will be replacing all my coolant hoses soon, at which point I will go back to the 1.3 bar cap.
Please see:
http://www.scuderiaciriani.com/rx7/cooling.html#CAP
for more information.
If you need a 0.9 cap, go to Mazda. If you want higher, look here:
http://66.216.67.51/subcatmfgprod.asp?0=352&1=355&2=-1
Mazda claimed the burst coolant hoses were causing engine fires.
A higher pressure cap will allow higher coolant temperatures before the coolant boils, which is a good thing. As with everything, there are trade offs.
My car has a 0.9 bar cap on the AST, and the coolant filler neck cap is not marked. I will be replacing all my coolant hoses soon, at which point I will go back to the 1.3 bar cap.
Please see:
http://www.scuderiaciriani.com/rx7/cooling.html#CAP
for more information.
If you need a 0.9 cap, go to Mazda. If you want higher, look here:
http://66.216.67.51/subcatmfgprod.asp?0=352&1=355&2=-1
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 2
From: My 350Z Roadster kicks my RX7's butt
After looking at the coolant system diagram, the filler neck and the AST, I realized I wanted I higher pressure cap on the filler neck because I do "not" want it releasing coolant there but instead I want it to flow in the the AST. The hole to the AST in the filler neck is lower then the bottom of the cap anyhow, so it makes no sense for a lower pressure cap there. So I put back my 1.3bar/18.5lbs Blitz cap on the filler neck.
I do want the water and air to escape from the AST to the overflow, so I removed the rubber stopper from a .9bar cap and used that on the AST. I'm not sure if that makes it a zero pressure cap or just lowers the pressure. So far it has worked excellent. The AST purculated like a hot coffe pot and no noise from the UIM or other places. The filler neck stayed full and the AST was mostly full. Oh and I recomend the Alumaseal over the CRC block weld.
I do want the water and air to escape from the AST to the overflow, so I removed the rubber stopper from a .9bar cap and used that on the AST. I'm not sure if that makes it a zero pressure cap or just lowers the pressure. So far it has worked excellent. The AST purculated like a hot coffe pot and no noise from the UIM or other places. The filler neck stayed full and the AST was mostly full. Oh and I recomend the Alumaseal over the CRC block weld.
Originally posted by GoRacer
Oh and I recomend the Alumaseal over the CRC block weld.
Oh and I recomend the Alumaseal over the CRC block weld.
Thanks!
oem mazda setup with ast:
ast gets a st'd pressure rated cap. was 1.3bar, now .9 bar (avoid splitting heat weakened coolant hoses to turbos). I use 1.1 bar stant. Should change every couple years ... they eventually leak pressure internally.
mazda oem filler neck cap is a non-relief cap ( no internal spring and lower sealing disc ), and thus has no pressure relief rating markings. Any cap should work there.
ast gets a st'd pressure rated cap. was 1.3bar, now .9 bar (avoid splitting heat weakened coolant hoses to turbos). I use 1.1 bar stant. Should change every couple years ... they eventually leak pressure internally.
mazda oem filler neck cap is a non-relief cap ( no internal spring and lower sealing disc ), and thus has no pressure relief rating markings. Any cap should work there.
^
|
|
|
What he said...
I prefer the original 1.3 cap, as the coolant boiling temp is higher. Just keep an eye on (or change) the hoses as part of your maintenance.
|
|
|
What he said...
I prefer the original 1.3 cap, as the coolant boiling temp is higher. Just keep an eye on (or change) the hoses as part of your maintenance.
Originally posted by KevinK2
oem mazda setup with ast:
ast gets a st'd pressure rated cap. was 1.3bar, now .9 bar (avoid splitting heat weakened coolant hoses to turbos). I use 1.1 bar stant. Should change every couple years ... they eventually leak pressure internally.
mazda oem filler neck cap is a non-relief cap ( no internal spring and lower sealing disc ), and thus has no pressure relief rating markings. Any cap should work there.
oem mazda setup with ast:
ast gets a st'd pressure rated cap. was 1.3bar, now .9 bar (avoid splitting heat weakened coolant hoses to turbos). I use 1.1 bar stant. Should change every couple years ... they eventually leak pressure internally.
mazda oem filler neck cap is a non-relief cap ( no internal spring and lower sealing disc ), and thus has no pressure relief rating markings. Any cap should work there.
-Max
What's the correct cap for those of us who have eliminated the AST? Steve's site says you should be using a 16psi cap that has a spring. Is it okay with the 0.9 bar cap that comes with the replacement filler neck (AST elimination)? (*still grumbling about the split hoses from the AST*)
The 0.9 cap that comes with the replacement filler neck is fine. If you are boiling the coolant too much and want to try a higher pressure cap (higher pressure = higher boiling point), that is fine, too.
-Max
-Max
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
24seven_dada
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
20
Nov 10, 2018 12:03 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Sep 11, 2015 12:13 PM





