what dop the stock twins trap..veterans please come in

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jan 14, 2005 | 02:36 PM

#76

rotorsownyou7

Slow RX-7

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 1,715

Likes: 0

From: Virginia

Alright guys, just make a poll or something. It doesn't look like you guys are going to agree, this currently is taking up two threads and about 100 posts.

Jan 14, 2005 | 02:52 PM

#77

Mr rx-7 tt

rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 2,316

Likes: 3

From: Virginia

Quote:

Originally Posted by matty

i am done arguing you simply dont understand....have u ever taken a statistics class? you would benefit greatly. i am not attacking you in asking that. You seem to not understand that when u have a data set there will be deviations. You exclude those as they really dobnt represent the larger group and therefore are anomalies. in 10 yrs time u will ahve a few cars that did something way above normal. You really shouldnt inlcude those in developing a thesis.
For example...yes i agree with you that the stockers can make 400 rwhp. But that is by no means what you can expect from a full bolt on car. Of the 1000 full bolt on cars in this forum...we could probbaly identify 5 cars (if that) that made 400 rwhp. That isnt the norm and way out of the bell curve. There fore if someone asks me what the stockers make i would say 340-365 rwhp...cause thats is what the other 995 cars make. Get it?
i will not be responding any further as u simply dont udnerstand..u must not have the capacity...its fine.

i dont have a spelling problem i have a typing proble...i work on a stock trading floor and frankly dont have the time to proof read, dont ask me how i am gettign away with typing and responding so much.

maybe next time we can meet at kd rotarywhen i ask him to tune my stock twin car to 400 rwhp so i can trap 125 mph.

Have I taken a statistics class?

I have an undergrad (bachelors) in Governmental STATISTICAL policy analysis!

Do I understand? Yes...YOU DON'T. The control group is SMALL to begin with as I pointed out but you didn't pick that up. Here one more time.

"Secondly, there are not that many RX-7's with those certain mods we are discussing. They all have to have certain mods, tuned, and DRAG RACED. How many cars fit those specs? "

That means there are VERY FEW of the cars we are talking about to begin with.
Finally let me help you out beacuse you continue to try and BS your way out of the cold hard facts. These numbers have been run by MULTIPLE members...MULTIPLE.

1) It takes 360 rwhp to get you 120 mph traps in a 2900 lbs RX-7. That is fact, PERIOD. It doesn't matter if it was one car or 100 it was DONE.

2) The STOCK twins do trap 120 mph again DONE, FACT.

3) We aren't talking about how much hp the twins make on the average car, we are talking about what hp does it take to make 120 mph passes. 360 rwhp plus, your anaolgy is bad.

4)You do have a spelling problem. Correct at least some your errors.

Last edited by Mr rx-7 tt; Jan 14, 2005 at 03:06 PM.

Jan 14, 2005 | 02:53 PM

#78

Mr rx-7 tt

rotary sensei

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 2,316

Likes: 3

From: Virginia

Quote:

Originally Posted by rotorsownyou7

Alright guys, just make a poll or something. It doesn't look like you guys are going to agree, this currently is taking up two threads and about 100 posts.

True, the loser will never admit he was wrong even with slips, dynos and other members testimony.