3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

Weird Boost Issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 11:10 AM
  #51  
autoxer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 49
Likes: 2
From: Knoxville, TN
WaLieN, you can't use a bleeder on that, since it will constantly bleed the pressure out of your tank when then car is under vacuum (which you don't want to happen).

The grainger valve is more of a "pop-off" valve, it only vents at the set pressure. The further you screw it in, the more pressure it takes for it to vent. When the pressure drops below the set level, it stops venting.

I get mine from McMaster-Carr (www.mcmaster.com).

From them, the valve is part number 48935K25, but you may need to unscrew it and put the ball on the other side of the spring in order to convert it from vacuum to pressure blow off operation.

The hose barb (3/16") for it is 5346K51
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 07:21 AM
  #52  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 696
From: Arlington, VA
Well, per TCB100's suggestion, I tried switching the lines to the actuator... no love. Normal boost , with no transition and tapering off above 4500.

Occasionally, my car will make the farty-no-power-didn't-transition-back sound when I haven't "boosted" in a while, say after i've sat at a light and try to pull away quickly. That was definately gone with the hose switch.

I guess i'll have to try the bleed valve.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 01:34 AM
  #53  
Speed of light's Avatar
Form follows function
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 47
From: Now in Arizona
Be so advised that the same TC solenoid that AUTOXER has had difficulty with also has shown a partial failure mode. I discovered this during testing about a year ago, while chasing another problem. I'll leave it up to you to consider the ramifications this could have.

Here's what happens: there is pressure on the TC solenoid, it switches states and should vent. It does not, rather; it will bleed down slowly, in my case it took 30 seconds or so from 15#, and when it got down to about 3 psi in the line then the internal spring would overcome the pressure and it would open rapidy. Found a spare, it worked fine.

AUTOXER: Great job on the methodical troubleshooting.

I was reading his post with great interest because I occasionally experience a similar problem. However, in my case, boost always comes right back to about 6 or 7# and sits there (when the seconday should be fully on-line). It's acts like the secondary is locked out--just as when the engine is cold. This could have something to do with the wastegate controls. Further testing is indicated, but I'll take suggestions...

FWIW: I have also diagnosed another unsual boost transistion & secondary behavior to a leaking cover plate over the precontrol valve on the turbos. IF YOU HEAR A BUZZING, RATTLING OR RAPID METALLIC TAPPING SOUND THAT STARTS AND GETS LOUDER AS PRIMARY BOOST IS DEVELOPED then check this cover on the turbo center section for leaks. I wrote a post about this problem for another thread. For more info. search on my name to find it.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 07:15 AM
  #54  
HDP's Avatar
HDP
A Fistfull of Dollars!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 6
From: HuntsVEGAS, AL
The pressure relief valve didn't work. The solenoid spring must be weaker than 9 psi. I guess I need a new solenoid.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 01:55 PM
  #55  
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Pressure Chamber Regulator

Originally Posted by autoxer
WaLieN, you can't use a bleeder on that, since it will constantly bleed the pressure out of your tank when then car is under vacuum (which you don't want to happen).

The grainger valve is more of a "pop-off" valve, it only vents at the set pressure. The further you screw it in, the more pressure it takes for it to vent. When the pressure drops below the set level, it stops venting.

I get mine from McMaster-Carr (www.mcmaster.com).

From them, the valve is part number 48935K25, but you may need to unscrew it and put the ball on the other side of the spring in order to convert it from vacuum to pressure blow off operation.

The hose barb (3/16") for it is 5346K51
I use the Norgren R07-100-RGAA which can be purchased: http://www.jhf.com/CatalogHtml/0676.htm
It should be place between the check valve and the pressure chamber. It comes with a guage, so you can read how much psi is being stored in the chamber.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 08:38 AM
  #56  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 696
From: Arlington, VA
Back from the dead:

I've located a presure regulating valve (Peter Farrell actually put it on my car years ago to help w/ this problem, and it was subsequently removed by KD when the motor was done), however, I would think it would be better to plumb in AFTER the presure tank, instead of before... that way the tank can hold all it wants, but you know that the "feed" to the solonoids will only be X amount. I suppose it's real easy to try both ways though.

Any disadvantage to plumbing after the pres. tank?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 09:09 AM
  #57  
technonovice's Avatar
Jinx
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
What sort of valve are you referrring too?

If you are taking about the check valve then it needs to be before the tank Sounds like you are saying PFS added a non-stock valve.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 09:31 AM
  #58  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 696
From: Arlington, VA
I've had the described problem in this thread since installing the PFS puple 'puter WAAYY back in '98-99. I initially took it to PFS, who had it for a couple weeks, and returned it declared "fixed". Worked better, but not exactly perfect. That fix included this non-stock pressure regulating valve, clearly visable near the pressure tank, though I can't remember exactly where.

The car went to KD rotary in '01 for a new motor, and Dave removed it in addition to other little things. Still never really worked right. I put in '99 turbos last spring, and it worked perfectly when I got it back, for about three weeks... when I took the car back to RP for a re-try on the oil pan reseal. Got it back, and it didn't work well at all.

I took it apart, replaced the TC solonoid with a brand new one, and replaced all of the silicon lines going to it. Checked the pressure and vac tanks, and replaced check valves. Still doesn't work. I currently run the car with the pressure line to the actuator disconnected completely, and it runs passibly OK on vacuum alone. That's how i know it's pressure-related. The pressure obviously isn't being vented imediately when the throttle is released, and hence the solonoid is stuck in twin mode.

I found the old valve in the box of stuff i got back from KD, and I'm going to try it again.



Originally Posted by technonovice
What sort of valve are you referrring too?

If you are taking about the check valve then it needs to be before the tank Sounds like you are saying PFS added a non-stock valve.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 10:57 PM
  #59  
M104-AMG's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 6
From: FL
BTW: here are some photos showing doing a test while the solenoid is still in the rat's nest and in the car.

:-) neil

PS: note the power-supply made by me from 1980!



Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 12:31 AM
  #60  
HDP's Avatar
HDP
A Fistfull of Dollars!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 6
From: HuntsVEGAS, AL
Oooohhhh..... you should really consider stuffing rags or something in your LIM ports to avoid dropping something in them.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 06:48 AM
  #61  
M104-AMG's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 6
From: FL
Yep, I stuffed them with rags after I looked at this picture.

:-) neil
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #62  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 696
From: Arlington, VA
I dug up the regulator PFS stuck on my car back in the day, and as soon as I locate a mityvac to test/reset the pressure level to about 9-10 psi, i'll try it and report. Stupid me, I futzed with it and moved the setting... otherwise I could've just thrown it on.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2005 | 11:21 PM
  #63  
ptrhahn's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,273
Likes: 696
From: Arlington, VA
UPDATE:

Problem solved!!
I connected a mityvac and boost guage to the air presure regulator, and set it for 9 psi max. I read in the manual that the actuator itself is meant to work with between 7.5 and 11.5 psi... and i'm guessing the solonoids were as well. Spliced it into the outgoing presure line from the pressure tank, and viola! No more boost issue, even running 15 psi.

I wish i'd put this thing back on years ago! One of the PFS mechanics obviously analyzed what was happpening a long time ago. I can't believe how much time and money i wasted to get back to this point.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2005 | 12:14 AM
  #64  
HDP's Avatar
HDP
A Fistfull of Dollars!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,322
Likes: 6
From: HuntsVEGAS, AL
Originally Posted by ptrhahn
UPDATE:

Problem solved!!
I connected a mityvac and boost guage to the air presure regulator, and set it for 9 psi max. I read in the manual that the actuator itself is meant to work with between 7.5 and 11.5 psi... and i'm guessing the solonoids were as well. Spliced it into the outgoing presure line from the pressure tank, and viola! No more boost issue, even running 15 psi.

I wish i'd put this thing back on years ago! One of the PFS mechanics obviously analyzed what was happpening a long time ago. I can't believe how much time and money i wasted to get back to this point.
Not quite sure what you did. Could you post a few pics to help me visualize what you are talking about?
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2005 | 08:45 PM
  #65  
M104-AMG's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 6
From: FL
Dave et al.,

Can someone verify that the Turbo Control solenoid is the THIRD one from the front ?

That is, it is the solenoid with the Tan electrical connector ?

Which one is the charge control solenoid ?

I'm asking, because my symptom is back . . .

:-( neil

Last edited by M104-AMG; Jul 9, 2005 at 08:55 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 10:55 AM
  #66  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Yes, it's the third one from the front on the bottom - dig up the vac diagram and follow the lines to the turbo control actuator to be certain.

Dave
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #67  
BATMAN's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley Bay Area
I'm having some boost issues that might be a result of my bad knock sensor trying to kill HP.

I'm surprise that no one has mentioned this.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2011 | 11:28 AM
  #68  
M104-AMG's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 6
From: FL
I'm posting this for posterity sake:

NEW FACTORY OE solenoids have a 50% of FAILING the high-pressure test.

Yep, I orderd all new Factory OE solenoids, and 50% failed the test. That's why for essential pressure work I'm going to the "external" Fabco solenoids !

:-) neil
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2011 | 11:39 AM
  #69  
limepro's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by M104-AMG
I'm posting this for posterity sake:

NEW FACTORY OE solenoids have a 50% of FAILING the high-pressure test.

Yep, I orderd all new Factory OE solenoids, and 50% failed the test. That's why for essential pressure work I'm going to the "external" Fabco solenoids !

:-) neil
You should rethink that and check these out.

https://www.rx7club.com/group-buy-product-dev-fd-rx-7-269/custom-solenoid-rack-968956/
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2011 | 12:31 PM
  #70  
Funkspectrum's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 30
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Back from the dead? Or just Chuck Testa?
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 09:34 AM
  #71  
3rd Gen Jeremy's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
RESURRECTION!! I know it's an old thread but I have to stop in and say THANKS DAVE DISNEY!!! This was awesome work and it fixed a problem I've had since I bought the car 7 years ago. I just thought it was a flaw in the turbo control system but I replaced the solenoid last night and the car is completely different. I can pull out of an apex like nobody's business. You guys rock and thanks again Dave!!
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2012 | 10:47 AM
  #72  
M104-AMG's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 6
From: FL
Originally Posted by limepro
You should rethink that and check these out.

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=968956
Those are made from Fabco solenoids . . .

:-) neil
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
incubuseva
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Apr 9, 2025 05:04 PM
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Sep 14, 2015 07:50 PM
TerryD
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
Aug 23, 2015 07:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 AM.