3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

V mount vs CF vented hood?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-08, 06:16 PM
  #1  
RAWWRRX7

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
drezjdmrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
V mount vs CF vented hood?

I'm sort of in a dilemma and of course like everyone else on this forum i come to everyone for advice...i currently have a front mount intercooler set up on my car and it's definetly not getting enough air circulation so i'm thinking going to one or the other i get around 85-88C's when driving around town and i know of people that get 79-81C's when driving around with a V mount setup before i spend the money i'm just wondering what most of you think i should do go v-mount or vented hood.
Old 05-11-08, 06:41 PM
  #2  
RX7FD3S

iTrader: (3)
 
RX7LINK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South Bay, North Cali.
Posts: 1,489
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
to make the vmount work efficiently, you'll need a vented hood anyways. get the vented hood first and see if you have any temp drop already
Old 05-11-08, 06:51 PM
  #3  
Always Under Construction

iTrader: (9)
 
twomucboost4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 2,294
Received 20 Likes on 11 Posts
Are you talking about water temps? If so 85-88 is not bad at all. If you are consistantly going up around 95 then I would worry. If your talking about AIT then you need to throw that front mount in the garbage.

Chris
Old 05-11-08, 07:09 PM
  #4  
Form follows function

iTrader: (8)
 
Speed of light's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Now in Arizona
Posts: 1,203
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by RX7LINK
to make the vmount work efficiently, you'll need a vented hood anyways. get the vented hood first and see if you have any temp drop already
I don't agree. I have built 2 V mounts and there is plently of empirical evidence (street & track) that they are extremely effective and work very well with the stock hood, undertray and even the '93 nose. Not only are water and intake temps well controlled, but underhood temps are reduced substantially; again this is with the stock, unvented hood.
Old 05-11-08, 07:43 PM
  #5  
SideWayZ The Only Way

iTrader: (11)
 
FD3S2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie, Florida
Posts: 4,854
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
dude if thos are water temps you are talking about.. thats really good.. lots of people get into the 90s at normal driving.. so i wouldnt complain.
Old 05-11-08, 07:51 PM
  #6  
Mr. Links

iTrader: (1)
 
Mahjik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 27,595
Received 40 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by drezjdmrx7
I'm sort of in a dilemma and of course like everyone else on this forum i come to everyone for advice...i currently have a front mount intercooler set up on my car and it's definetly not getting enough air circulation so i'm thinking going to one or the other i get around 85-88C's when driving around town and i know of people that get 79-81C's when driving around with a V mount setup before i spend the money i'm just wondering what most of you think i should do go v-mount or vented hood.

You do realize that the stock thermostat is just getting to be fully open around 85C? Those temps are fine.
Old 05-11-08, 08:47 PM
  #7  
SideWayZ The Only Way

iTrader: (11)
 
FD3S2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie, Florida
Posts: 4,854
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
now a days people want the car to run like they just started it.. next they;ll be saying 78* is to hot.
Old 05-11-08, 09:06 PM
  #8  
RAWWRRX7

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
drezjdmrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i'm talking about water temps...well if you are sitting in traffic or you bring it around a few laps at the track the rad will be heat soaked without proper air flow going through the rad... i understand 85-88 are good water temps but i like to take care of my car and would like honest answers or solutions that have worked for you or other members that you would recommend to me i'm not concerned i know over heating wont be a problem but better air flow is never a bad thing...that's for the info Mahjik...and FD3S2005 no need for the 2 cents of sarcasm and i'm not complaining just trying to ask knowledgeable people a question.
Old 05-11-08, 09:12 PM
  #9  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (6)
 
7_rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 7,139
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
SMIC, turn your fans on in traffic
Old 05-11-08, 11:18 PM
  #10  
Newbie
 
kognition's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting
Old 05-11-08, 11:52 PM
  #11  
SideWayZ The Only Way

iTrader: (11)
 
FD3S2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Davie, Florida
Posts: 4,854
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
evans coolant?
Old 05-12-08, 02:31 AM
  #12  
4 rotor 964 lol

iTrader: (1)
 
s-thetikz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SoCA/ MA
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by drezjdmrx7
i'm talking about water temps...well if you are sitting in traffic or you bring it around a few laps at the track the rad will be heat soaked without proper air flow going through the rad... i understand 85-88 are good water temps but i like to take care of my car and would like honest answers or solutions that have worked for you or other members that you would recommend to me i'm not concerned i know over heating wont be a problem but better air flow is never a bad thing...that's for the info Mahjik...and FD3S2005 no need for the 2 cents of sarcasm and i'm not complaining just trying to ask knowledgeable people a question.

yeah man, you don't know what you're talking about. if your car ran at 79, your car isn't fully warmed up. 85 is fine. when you start hitting 90's is when it might be a problem.
Old 05-12-08, 03:05 AM
  #13  
Right-Wing Extremist Vet

iTrader: (-1)
 
Archie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, Dirty Glove
Posts: 2,938
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
I'm running around 85-86 with stock hood/ M2 large SMIC after jaunts in the canyons ; consistently boosting in 3rd to redline.
Old 05-12-08, 11:18 AM
  #14  
SAQ
Full Member

 
SAQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: VOLOS-GREECE
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the cost is not a problem then a V- mount is by far better.You get better response for your turbo,you have much lower temps in the engine bay (since the hot air from the fans is been directed under the car),its much mor efficient at lower speeds since you feed it directly with fresh air !
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vqturbo
Old School and Other Rotary
32
08-11-23 07:29 PM
82streetracer
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
7
08-23-15 09:28 AM



Quick Reply: V mount vs CF vented hood?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.