3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002) 1993-2002 Discussion including performance modifications and Technical Support Sections.
Sponsored by:

twin 2 inch mufflers???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #1  
vrmmmpshhh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Australia
twin 2 inch mufflers???

hey guys. got a almost stock fd with power fc and just wondering if i did my exhaust a full 3 inch the entire way and right at the back split it into twin 2 inches into twin 2" inlet mufflers. i like the look of 2 smaller mufflers compared to a big one.

any thoughts?
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #2  
rynberg's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14,716
Likes: 10
From: San Lorenzo, California
Yeah, it would be a bad idea. Two 2" pipes flow less than one 3" pipe. And the split would further cost you flow from turbulence.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 08:42 PM
  #3  
Speed of light's Avatar
Form follows function
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 47
From: Now in Arizona
I'm going to have to disagree with Rynberg on this one. The two 2" pipes have a combined area equal to a 2.82" diameter pipe (about 72mm). While I agree that a split can introduce turbulence, it's effect on flow is going to be minor--negligible. The exhaust you describe will have more flow potential than you are likely to need.

So it seems reasonable to me. If this is what you want to do, then do it.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #4  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
If you're talking about running a dual exhaust in back, it's going to be a pain since the gas tank is in the way on the left side.

If you're simply talking about running a pair of pipes side-by-side in the stock location, I think your results will be substantially better than stock, but not quite as free-flowing as a single 3" pipe. The cross-sectional area of the pipe will be similar, but the reynolds number (turbulence) will be higher because the flow will be more fully developed. How much difference it will make in hp is hard to say, but it should still work a whole lot better than stock.

Dave
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2007 | 11:34 PM
  #5  
FDNewbie's Avatar
Sponsor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,216
Likes: 4
From: Tampa, FL
The engineer has spoken
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 12:33 AM
  #6  
vrmmmpshhh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Australia
excellent. yeah twin mufflers coming out of the right side. might try 2.25 and just flaring the inlets of the mufflers.

my car came with a blitz cannon and although it sounds awesome its just too big for my tastes.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #7  
BryanDowns's Avatar
.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 18
From: Louisville
Something like this?



I figured I would post it to give you an idea on how to accomplish what you are talking about
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #8  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 12,313
Likes: 27
From: Hershey PA
Since that showed up absolutely black on my monitor, here is a more visible version:

Attached Thumbnails twin 2 inch mufflers???-dsc03772.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 04:15 PM
  #9  
vrmmmpshhh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Australia
yeah exactly like that.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 04:19 PM
  #10  
preludesh2000's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: ohio
personally i think its a waste of money...

brad
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 10:13 PM
  #11  
BryanDowns's Avatar
.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 18
From: Louisville
Originally Posted by preludesh2000
personally i think its a waste of money...

brad

Well, power wise... probably. Looks wise, or sound wise though... not at all.

Two 2" outlets will sound very different than 1 3" or 3.5" outlet will. Obviously they will look different as well, and if thats the look you are after then of course it makes sense.

I thought I'd add that the tips in that picture are twin 3" tips coming from 2.5" outlet mufflers. Just in case you wanted some type of size reference for what you are wanting to do.

Last edited by BryanDowns; Feb 25, 2007 at 10:20 PM. Reason: added exhuast size
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 11:35 PM
  #12  
KaiFD3S's Avatar
SINFUL7
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,574
Likes: 1
From: Alaska
that set up is what most v8 guys when they do a LS swap or the rx2, 3 and 4 guys...
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2007 | 05:55 AM
  #13  
Speedworks's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 5
From: Belgium
I'll be doing that too. HKS 76mm downpipe into dual running 60mm tubing with dual 60mm runner muffler in the stock cat location proceeding to the back with same dual running setup into a catback dual runner muffler (0mm) ending in dual tips or 1 big single (oval).

dual 60 should flow more than te single 3" (70mm) I had before and should keep noiselevels way lower than the 3" because of the smaller tubing (resonance factor).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
Jul 17, 2019 02:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.